Before He Was a Teacher What s Wrong?

Updated on educate 2024-02-09
9 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    There is nothing wrong with this sentence alone!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Summary. Hello dear, I'm glad to answer for you, the position of the time adverbial in the sentence can be preposed or posted, but it should be noted that when the temporal adverbial is relatively long or there is a long distance from the subject and predicate, it is usually placed at the end of the sentence to ensure that the sentence order is clear and coherent. This sentence structure is also known as an inverted sentence, that is, the temporal adverbial is placed after the subject and the predicate to form a structure of "subject + predicate + temporal adverbial".

    Thus, "he was a teacher before" can be rewritten as "he was a teacher before (something happened)", in which the temporal adverbial "before (something happened)" is postposed in order to express the meaning of the whole sentence more accurately.

    Why should he+was+a+teacher+befor time adverbial be postpositioned.

    Hello dear, I'm glad to answer for you, the position of the temporal adverbial in the sentence can be preposed or postposed, but it should be noted that when the temporal adverbial is relatively long or there is a longer distance from the subject and predicate, it is usually placed at the end of the sentence to ensure that the sentence order is clear and coherent. This kind of sentence formation is also known as an inverted sentence, that is, the temporal adverbial is placed after the subject and the predicate to form a structure of "subject + predicate + temporal adverbial". Therefore, "he was a teacher before" can be rewritten as "he was a teacher before (something happened)", in which the temporal adverbial "before (something happened)" is postposed in order to express the meaning of the whole sentence more accurately.

    So why can't it be written as he was a teacher?

    In English, the subject and predicate are usually written next to each other, and no other components can be inserted in between. In this sentence, the subject is "he", the predicate is "was a teacher", and the temporal adverbial "before" cannot be inserted in the middle, otherwise the basic word order of the sentence limb Huai Lizi will be destroyed. Therefore, the correct sentence structure should be "he was a teacher before", and the time adverbial "before" in Ming Zhengzhong is placed after the predicate "was a teacher" to form the order of subject + predicate + time calendar adverbial.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    c, before we arrived in the town, it was dark.

    This is not an emphatic sentence, because the emphatic sentence has a characteristic, that is, the emphasis is removed, and the structure is was....The meaning and structure of the sentence that are still intact. This sentence becomes if the structure is removed:

    we reached the little town (in the) evening.That is, less in the

    So exclude a

    If you choose B, it doesn't make sense. "It was dark until we got to the town. ”

    If you want to express "until we reach the town it's not dark anymore", it should be used.

    it was not evening until we reached.

    Pick C, literally before we arrived in town, it was already night. That is: before we arrived in the town, it was dark and the bridge was teased.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    i wasn't a teacher。

    were you a teacher?

    Pay attention to the interrogative sentence and how it is returned.

    Ordinary people can't ask themselves questions.

    Since the answer to the interrogative sentence is "i was a teacher." ”

    Then when others ask him, the pronoun must change accordingly.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    i wasn't a teacher.

    were you a teacher?

    yes, i was.

    no, i wasn't.

    Learning is a pleasure! (

    Please adopt it in time, thank you!

  6. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    A---

    Q: Have you ever been a teacher? were you a teacher ?

    A: Yes. i was a teacher .

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Answer] A Answer Analysis] Test Question Analysis: Sentence Meaning: The teacher is very satisfied with Tony's. and ......Together; on

    In ......Above, about; in

    In ......Inside; for

    For, because. Here is the phrase be

    pleased

    with…......Touched and satisfied. So choose A.

    Test Place: Prepositions are examined.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    b test chaotic collapse check phrase analysis. made of what, become of how the source is around, what happened, brought up cultivation, happened on, sentence meaning: he was a teacher hail with oak before he left his hometown.

    How has he been since then. So choose B.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Answer D analysis seepage: By but now he is a teacher knows the situation of the past referred to above, and uses the general past to shout the absence of time. In addition, when used in conjunction with the present perfect tense, it often indicates that past actions or experiences have an impact on the present.

Related questions