Problems with Apple IMAC, IMAC and IMAC Pro?

First of all, a 27-inch screen is necessary, the 27-inch resolution is 2560 1440, and the 1920 1080, a larger screen and higher resolution allow you to open more plug-in windows under the same screen without being affected, longer audio tracks don't have to be dragged around, the convenience is not the same, and the price difference is not much.

As for the quad-core, it will definitely be helpful for you to process, but it depends on whether your processing capacity is large or not large, but the motherboard used in the quad-core is a higher-end PM55, and the built-in sound chip is not the same. There is also a difference in the output and input quality of the audio. Of course, if you buy a professional external sound card or something like that, you can ignore it.

If you think mine is okay, give me points :)

First of all, the MIDI format file is comparable to a Word file, Word, of course, does not use quad cores, Celeron is enough, so IMAC is fine.

Downmixing is more complicated, depending on how many tracks you want to run and what format of audio. Also consider whether there will be software effects added to each audio track. At this point, there is something wrong with the iMac.

Next, talking about soft music sources, I chatted with an engineer of Vienna soft music sources, and he told me that "Batman" was made using 4 servers through network synchronization plus a special version of 1000G vienna audio sources. Of course, you still have to find a real orchestra of a few people to accompany you in front. So, the iMac doesn't work.

It is recommended to go to the computer market and buy a good ASUS motherboard, a 4-core entry CPU, a simple dual-head graphics card, 4G memory to start, a SATATII hard disk, two screens, it is estimated that 7-8000 pieces are enough. Of course, the premise is that you still use your Logic Studio, and don't forget to ask the merchant to help you install the OSX when you buy a computer.

4 cores don't need to be used dual-core is enough 27 is a little bigger, it's big Apple computers have always pursued the limit, and it's enough for you to use.

The processor is not particularly important, the dual-core one is enough, 21 inches is enough, and the resolution is the same anyway.

iMac and iMac Pro are in different directions, you can easily see that iMac is equipped with a core processor, and iMac Pro is equipped with a Xeon series processor, with ECC memory, and the graphics card also uses Vega instead of 5000 series, for iMac, even if it is paired with a certain upgrade, ** has not reached the starting point of iMac, and it can even be said that these two devices have little intersection. What you said you need to do is to consider your usage environment and usage time, and then consider which one you want to buy, after fully considering the memory of automatic error correction and the software's support for multi-core and multi-threaded CPUs and professional processors, the two of them are obviously aimed at different people.

1.Large 3D games eat graphics cards,Look at you,It should be very old.,9400m,It's obviously not good.。 Call of Duty 7, my GT330M is struggling to run, and 9400M is obviously even harder.

As for fluency, it depends on what effect you have opened, all of which are low, and fluency should be okay.

2.Compared with XP,Mac OS system is much faster,Your configuration,Open Photoshop at the same time,Illustrator,Indesign is no problem,The key depends on the memory,4G is enough。 And switching between multiple screens (space) is very fast.

3.This question is more difficult, what is ordinary higher performance What is higher? Which era is ordinary and when is it higher?

Give me a reference. This iMac seems to be a very old model, at least before 2009, if compared with the ordinary PC at that time, it can be understood as: the same configuration, the same age, the original price of the iMac is twice as expensive as the assembly machine, and it is 30 40 more expensive than the original machine of other brands.

Is it okay to have such a reference?

The hardware of the 2011** iMac does not support 32-bit system, the temperature control of the Mac under XP and Vista does not work, the temperature of the body will be as high as 90, the wireless network does not work normally under the win7 32-bit system, unless the sound control is removed, the new iMac can only work normally under the win764-bit system in win7.

Upgrading the RAM above 8G, the operation of Call of Duty 7 is a piece of cake for the IMAC.

Apple's computer is definitely compatible with the built-in Mac system, which is better.

Summary. Hello, it may be that the system is being updated, and if it has not changed for a long time, the system needs to be reinstalled.

The Apple iMac has been in this state all the time, can it handle it on its own? Ask the gods for help.

Hello, it may be that the system is being updated, and if it has not changed for a long time, the system needs to be reinstalled.

How long do you have to wait for it to be considered unchanged, how to reinstall the system.

Wait for a few hours, some will get stuck.

Are you an iPhone or a Mac?

Computer. What's going on with that row of number keys on top that doesn't work.

Hello, is the computer ready to use?

If your laptop's numeric call key doesn't work, then your first reaction and argument should be to check if the "num lock" key is turned on. If the "num lock" key is turned on, then we can simply turn it off, and the number key can generally be used again. If it's not the "num lock" key, then we'll have to look up the model of the notebook and check if we need a keyboard driver.

Otherwise, it is necessary to find professional personnel to carry out repairs.

General computer managers can check it.

What to do if you haven't gotten better yet.

Need to go to reinstall the system.

How to reload. You need a USB flash drive with a system, just install it directly.