In the face of freedom and love, which one to choose?

If you pursue freedom, it means that you want to be unfettered, this is what everyone pursues, but if there is no love, your life will be flawed, because you have not experienced love, you will never know the taste of love, love and freedom, sometimes, it may be difficult to choose, but when you understand it, you will know everything.

That's my point.

In a quiet night, alone, quiet, in a quiet time, people can know their inner world, at this time think about it, maybe love and freedom are not opposites, if there is any problem between the two, combined with the actual situation you are in now, from the problem to find the root of the problem? That's all I can do to help......

I think that you don't have to choose what you can have at the same time, and there are some things that you can't choose, so why bother to choose them yourself. If you have to choose, I think it is freedom, there is nothing more precious than freedom, without your own love, you will not be happy!

If you want to pursue yourself, then choose freedom.

But if you want to live with peace of mind, it is better to choose a down-to-earth relationship to firewood, rice, oil and salt. Only by being practical can it withstand the tempering of the years.

Because choosing love can also pursue freedom, the love of two people is important first and foremost, choose love, if you miss it, when can you find the one you like.

You should choose freedom. Because the time for you to be free is so short, and after you choose love, it is equivalent to abandoning yourself, and you will not be free again for the rest of your life.

He's in charge of real life, you're in charge of creating dreams, occasionally walking into his world, occasionally taking him into yours, it doesn't feel like a conflict.

It's up to you, it's up to you which one you value more, but you can also find freedom in love, isn't it?

It depends, if you are truly in love with your significant other, then choose love, and if you don't know or don't know, choose freedom.

If he loves you and you love him, then love. If you haven't even thought about it, it's a different story.

As long as one of you loves each other very much, he will be willing to change for the other person, and I also like the feeling of freedom.

WANT LOVE at the moment ... But I believe that in the end, I still choose to be free.

In fact, many times the personalities need to be complementary, and maybe you have a good match like this.

Since ancient times, you can't have both fish and bear's paws, and the way to do this is to raise a bear that can catch fish!

I choose love because a successful love will allow you to have freedom.

Life is precious, but love is even more valuable. If it is free, both can be thrown.

I will choose freedom, because love is too bitter, it is better to forget.

Two. Elopement is not enough.

Freedom and love are there.

If it were that person, I would definitely choose love without hesitation.

As long as you have the ability to coordinate and find their balance, both are fine.

For those who have not been in love yet, they will choose love!

Self-belief is better than freedom, and the key to this depends on oneself.

It's hard to find love to be free, and it's hard to be free to be free.

Love, eat without vegetables, save money and fall in love.

Freedom, two people should have relatively personal space.

Then follow him freely and steadily!

Love, freedom is really not as important as love.

Love is free, you change to marriage.

Compared with love and freedom, I personally think that love is more important, because the so-called freedom, surrounded by love, can also be enjoyed.

Because if you haven't experienced love in life, it means that your life is blank, after all, you don't understand the sweetness that male and female love brings to you, and you can't experience the kind of joy that two people have experienced in the process of establishing the most emotional, and the kind of heart and heart exchange that they have experienced to each other, so it will be more important than freedom relative to freedom, because looking at this so-called definition of freedom, although it looks chic on the surface, but in fact, behind the chic is a lot of helplessness and sadness. After all, you have not experienced the process of heart-to-heart exchange between people, especially between people of the opposite sex, and you do not have that feeling of sharing hardships and hardships, so even if you are given more freedom, you will not be able to experience the emotions in it.

So I personally think that love is relatively far more important than freedom, only if you have experienced unforgettable love, you will understand later, in fact, love is priceless, it will accompany you for a lifetime, but this feeling of freedom can not stay in your heart forever.

Love or freedom, which is more important?

Starting from the instinct of human behavior, food, cold, and freedom belong to the primary survival needs, without which the life process of this person will be difficult to continue. Pei Duofei's famous poem adds: Life is precious, but love is more valuable. If it is free, both can be thrown.

It can be seen from this that without food and cold, people lose the material basis for survival, but without freedom, people lose the basis of spiritual and behavioral freedom for survival, and once people lose the freedom of spirit and behavior, will they still have the freedom of love? "The skin does not exist, the hair will be attached", where does love begin? Therefore, freedom is the most basic condition and environmental requirement for being a human being, except for the basic survival prerequisites such as diet and cold protection.

Life is precious, but love is even more valuable.

If it is free, both can be thrown.

Leave behind to know, if there is no life.

Love** find.

——— Pei Duofei.

Life is precious.

Love is more expensive.

If it is for the sake of freedom.

Both can be thrown.