How to look at the behavior of paparazzi to consume celebrity privacy

The paparazzi must have appeared because of a need. Now the entertainment industry is mixed, and there are countless celebrities of all sizes. And with so many celebrities appearing on the big screen, what are they doing the rest of the time?

Maybe some people won't be curious, but there will always be people. Because some people are curious, the profession of paparazzi was born. Let fans or viewers know what the people who appear on the big screen are doing in their lives.

This kind of behavior of the paparazzi is indeed very bad for the privacy of celebrities. No one will like it, there is someone who keeps staring at you, keeps patting you, keeps looking for something in you, something worthy of being talked about. There are pros and cons to the appearance of the paparazzi.

Many celebrities shoot a scene casually, and they can easily get sky-high salaries. It is their own choice to become a star, choose a low-pay, high-reward job.

Entertainment reporters**The privacy behavior of some celebrities is nothing! After all, celebrities are public figures, and they need to bear the public's moral expectations of him, and they are clean before and after. But there are several situations that make people sick and sick to their stomachs:

Celebrities paid money to cooperate with Yuji, deliberately creating scandal gimmicks and creating hype hotspots. There is also an entertainment record that captures the scandal. In addition, Yu Ji should also pay attention to the bottom line, people refuse to interview, forcefully interfere with people's private life space, and as a result, the interview itself becomes news!

I don't think this kind of behavior is bad, because most of the paparazzi's other people's behaviors are also some of the celebrity's privacy behavior, the star actually has no privacy in the spotlight, since she has done this industry, she must abide by the rules of the industry, secondly, many times the paparazzi's celebrity privacy behavior is granted to the paparazzi by the star himself.

It depends! If it's purely personal, if you're a paparazzi, it's an invasion of someone else's privacy! Otherwise, it cannot be regarded as an invasion of personal privacy!

As for the evaluation of the paparazzi, the paparazzi has become an industry in society, although the paparazzi say that it is hateful, but you have no privacy, what are you afraid of!

Personally, I feel that the relevant departments have rectified their industries and introduced relevant laws. While protecting the personal privacy of actors, restrictive unreasonable behaviors in the paparazzi industry, you can't report everything, and the focus is on reporting a positive culture.

Everyone's heart is full of curiosity and a gossip heart. Whether it is a celebrity or an ordinary person, they are unwilling to be inquired about by others, but everyone is willing to listen to other people's gossip. When others want to inquire about my privacy, I will keep my mouth shut, reply selectively, say what I can say, and don't say what I can't.

The secret is hidden in your heart, and if you don't say it, others will never know it, and since it's a private thing, you won't easily tell others. Someone trying to inquire about privacy must have something in mind. I don't want to know too many secrets of others, it is dangerous to know other people's secrets, in case his secrets are known by others, the first person to suspect is me, I am a stupid person who doesn't know how to fight back, so I'd rather not know.

In the same way, I don't want others to know a lot of my privacy, when others ask me, I choose not to say, the secret is hidden in my heart, if I don't say it, others will never know, I am safe. Many times, blaming others for leaking our secrets is actually that we are too gullible to others.

What can be said, what can't be said is resolutely not to say that life is a joke, and there are always people who want to know some jokes and snacks after dinner. Sometimes you can satisfy their curiosity, tell them something innocuous and increase your popularity, but other than that, you can't say anything. Your privacy is not about you alone, if it is emotion, it will involve a second person, where do you put his thoughts?

Therefore, what can be said is said, and what cannot be said is resolutely not said. For the sake of oneself and others, one should have a little morality. A person who inquires about other people's privacy is a person with bad intentions, and if you want to know other people's secrets, you want to ridicule others, and such a person is not kind in itself.

When I meet such a person in my life, I will choose to stay away because he is too gossipy, and people who like gossip are not strict in their mouths.

To be a man, we must talk about a little morality and sentiment, do what we can do, and never do what we can't do. Keep your mouth when you are in a group, and keep your heart when you are alone, do you remember it? Let's encourage each other.

I won't reveal my privacy easily, I will choose to fool the past. If you really can't do it, just tell others what you don't want.

In fact, I will be brave enough to refuse, because I don't want others to inquire about my privacy and feel that it has violated me.

Regardless of whether it is a celebrity or not, even an ordinary person does not want his privacy to be completely exposed to the eyes of others, especially for celebrities, revealing their private lives too much will have a great impact on their families.

Journalists, paparazzi, should not pay too much attention to the private life of the celebrity, because the focus of the star is on his work, and the journalist should pay attention to his work, not the private life of the celebrity.

No. Celebrities are also human beings and should have a normal life, and excessive attention from the paparazzi will bring unnecessary trouble to celebrities and their families.

Shouldn't. Paying too much attention to the private life of celebrities, and even causing trouble to the daily work and life of celebrities, involves the infringement of personal privacy, and may cause greater conflicts, which is already within the scope of illegality.

Shouldn't. The private life of the celebrity who is willing to announce can be paid attention to, and if he is unwilling, he can't force it, if he crosses the line too much, everyone will be disgusted.

Regarding the paparazzi's disregard for the privacy of celebrities, digging deep into the scandal and breaking the news is obviously wrong

First of all, celebrities also have the right to privacy. Actors or star singers, etc., are just one of his professions. Human rights should not be violated because of the specificity of the profession.

Actors are actually the same as all of us, they just have a higher income, and their profession has certain particularities, but they can't disclose their privacy and emotional problems because of this profession. The actor's private life actually has nothing to do with us

As long as they can bring us new works in the world acting career. Characters can't be confused with themselves. The original intention of the paparazzi is to show everyone the most real state of the star.

Say what the star looks like most naturally. The paparazzi followed the star like a dog skin plaster, but this also caused a lot of trouble to the star, so the paparazzi became the object of hatred of the star. And now the paparazzi have gone bad.

No matter what the celebrity's private behavior is. As long as it can make a profit, the paparazzi will immediately pounce on it like a vulture on the grassland and bite it hard. Completely disregarding the private privacy of celebrities.

This affects the quality of life of the stars. so that celebrities can only hide their heads and tails and live their private lives. Only in your own home can you breathe a sigh of relief.

And some more excessive paparazzi make celebrities always vigilant at home, always close the curtains, pay attention to whether there are hidden cameras in the home, etc. I want to say the paparazzi. There is nothing wrong with wanting to shoot stars to make a profit, but this degree needs to be accurately grasped.

To be honest, I think this behavior of the paparazzi is really excessive. Sometimes people don't want to talk about it for a reason.

I don't think there's anything wrong with it, if some celebrities weren't people before, do you think you would still fan him?

I think that's excessive. Everyone has their own privacy and secrets. And celebrities are the same as us ordinary people.

I don't think it's right, but as a public figure, you have to bear this kind of pressure.

It's definitely not right, everyone has their own privacy, but the privacy of celebrities also deserves to be respected and protected.

Personally, I think it's wrong, it makes people have no privacy at all, and violates people's portrait rights when they don't allow it.

No, celebrities are also human beings and have their own private lives, so it's not good to do so anyway.

This is certainly not right, everyone has their own privacy rights, and it is illegal for the paparazzi to do so.

No, everyone has everyone's privacy, and if it's made public, it's not called privacy.

I don't think this kind of behavior is bad, because the paparazzi are also some of the privacy behaviors of celebrities, celebrities actually have no privacy in the spotlight, since she has done this rough core bright industry, she must abide by the rules of this industry, secondly, many times the paparazzi**star Yankuan's privacy behavior is awarded to the paparazzi themselves.

If it's purely personal, if you're a paparazzi, it's a violation of someone else's privacy! Otherwise, it cannot be regarded as an invasion of personal privacy! As for the evaluation of the paparazzi, the paparazzi has become an industry in society, although the paparazzi are not hateful, but you have no privacy, what are you afraid of!

Cater to popular interest and increase sales. Sometimes it is also at the invitation of the whistleblower, hype it up, and increase the ** rate of the whistleblower. As a reporter himself, the number of times the content of the report is on the front page, and the length and breadth of the hype are the basic indicators to measure whether he is a famous reporter.