About Is Southern Communications Legit? Can it be done?

Of course it doesn't make sense. No individual or organization has the right to interfere with the freedom of marriage of others, and their agreement is contrary to the Marriage Law. In addition, the agreement entered into in violation of the Marriage Act is also not legally valid.

They are not entitled to compensation or punishment for your breach of this agreement. I think it's best to contact a local lawyer or someone who is familiar with the law and someone in the southern talent market to explain that their request is against the Marriage Act and that the agreement is not legally valid. Because you may also need to put your account there, it may be beneficial for both of you to seek a private solution that protects your interests.

I don't think the southern talent market can be stupid enough to insist on going to court, because the courts can't stand up to their demands.

Illegal, the marriage law stipulates that others cannot interfere with the freedom of marriage, and this contract does not have or part of it has no legal effect, even if you get married, he can't ask you for anything, and if you go to court, they will suffer a lot.

Of course it is illegal, it is an act of interfering with the freedom of marriage.

It is definitely unreasonable and not legal, and you can consult a local lawyer if you want to.

Marriage is fine as long as it does not violate the marriage law.

It's not legal, but if you work, obey.

Based on what you've described, are you asking if it's safe and legal to make a spring in Southern Real Estate? I think this situation is definitely not legal, try to push it to the bank, that is safer.

Guangdong lawyer Hu;

For this, you can go directly to ** to complain, there is no need to worry about this matter for so long.

I graduated today in June, and I am a junior college student. Our school allows us to apply for a hukou to be linked to the talent market, and the period is two years. And you can't go abroad or get married within two years. If you have to handle it, you have to move your household registration.

1. The term of your account:

1) It can only be based on the contract, and cannot be "said" for your ** classmates.

2) At this point, the southern talent has a contract as proof to prove that the period of your hukou is 2 years: the southern talent is not illegal.

3) As for "you don't have the contract in your hand, you didn't have it from the beginning, and the signature on it is not my handwriting": the contract is not between you and your classmates, you should go to your classmates to ask.

As long as the signature on the contract is your classmate's and not other unrelated person, the contract is legal and valid, because your classmate ** you handle the account attachment matter, it is legally authorized by you, and the rights and obligations of the contract should be borne by you, and your classmate did not report to you: you should go to investigate the responsibility of your classmate.

2. "I don't know when they issued a rule saying that their collective household registration will not be registered for marriage":

1) This regulation must have been introduced before your account is linked, and it is certainly not for you alone.

2) As for you not knowing in advance: you can only hold your classmates accountable, and you can't just disobey just because you don't know, right?

3. "I have consulted some people online and said that it is illegal for them to interfere with the freedom of personal marriage by doing so":

1) I don't think this is a regulation that interferes with the freedom of marriage, but only a collective household registration regulation.

2) And it was originally signed with you to obtain your consent, and it should be complied with.

4. "You want me to provide a copy of my marriage certificate and my wife's relevant information before returning the graduation certificate to me": What's the trouble with the marriage certificate and your wife's information you provide? Won't it solve all the problems if you go back to your hometown and open a permit for relocation?

5. "Can such a unit privately stipulate that it is not allowed to get married?" ": Complaining doesn't solve the problem, how many points do you scatter here, how many posts, or you have to give talent your marriage certificate and your wife's information first, it's better to do things first, besides, after all, the contract was signed by you, you didn't renew the contract in time after it expired, you violated the regulations and didn't move the hukou to get married first, after all, you can't use your ** person didn't tell you some information as a reason why you can not comply, right?

It's better to forget it, let's do things first after the fire is extinguished, so as to prevent the police station of your hometown from not issuing you a permit for relocation after a long time.

It's not illegal to say, but rice is the best: there is a food production license and a food circulation license,,, otherwise there is nothing to do if you don't check it in the south, once there is a problem and an inspection, it will be really troublesome. Food production license and food circulation license are very important...

Hello, I also want to go to the south to sell rice, and go out to investigate together.

This is a legitimate business, how can it be illegal, my family sends rice from the northeast to the south to sell it.

Your question is controversial in the field of history and jurisprudence, but it is explained in general terms: In May 1787, representatives of the states of the United States (then 13) convened a constitutional convention in Philadelphia, and on September 15 of the same year, the Constitutional Convention of the United States of America was adopted. It was not until 1789, six years after the victory of the Revolutionary War, and 13 years after the legal founding day, that the first part of the U.S. Constitution was adopted and the United States began to work.

A state is part of the United States if a representative of the state has signed the Constitution; But the United States is federal, which means that each state can vote for independence, which is in line with the spirit of the U.S. Constitution. But the independence of the southern states in the 19th century was initiated by farmers and oligarchs, and was generally not a referendum.

Note: The controversy is that the first U.S. Constitution allowed slaves to exist, because of the compromise made by Washington and others to get the Southern states to join the Union, and there were more slaves in the South and less racial discrimination in the North, which is still much the case. Before the Civil War of 1861, Robert's Southern ** Circle believed that slaves could not participate in referendums (racial discrimination), and that farmers and politicians could declare independence on behalf of the South; Lincoln** of the North did not think so, they believed that a referendum should be held (including blacks), and the ambiguity occurred here, coupled with the early fuse of the Southern Cotton Dispute, the Mexican War, and finally the American Civil War over civil rights and the preservation of the Constitution began.

Source: General History of the United States (I) [US] Written by Willian, translated by Liu Jun et al., Jiangxi People's Publishing House.

The woman buys the man's house, and the woman has paid the house to the man, and the house belongs to the woman, and the agreement cannot indicate that the man has the right of residence, and the man's permanent right of residence is illegal and illegal.

This agreement can be described as an unequal treaty. At present, one of the two people is willing to fight, and the other is willing to suffer, there is no problem. Think about it another way.

If the woman buys a stranger's house. Strangers are also allowed to live in the original house. That would be the equivalent of him giving money to a stranger and having nothing for himself.

On the other hand, if two people break up one day, the woman needs to use the marriage room. And the ex-boyfriend won't move out. Ready to live with three people?

From the perspective of the man's interests, the man not only did not lose the house, but also got a sum of money, plus a wishful girlfriend.

As long as it is the true expression of the intention of both parties, it is effective if it does not harm the interests of others.

Since two people are lovers, and the agreement is also consensual, there is no such thing as legal or illegal. The law only resolves conflicts, or acts that affect the interests of society or individuals. And what the Lord said clearly does not meet that condition.

As long as both parties agree to sign, the contract is legal. It can generally be understood that the woman has received ** preferential treatment or other compensation.

According to what you said, this agreement is true and valid, it is a legal contract and protected by law!

It would be good if there was no objection to the negotiation and it would not harm the interests of both parties.

This depends on whether the full amount is paid, and there is nothing to do with the man before marriage.

The law is also divided into large and small

The law of the province is not approved by the national law, and the formal will be filed with the Ministry of Commerce.

There are a lot of such trading markets in China, dozens, such as the North Oil Exchange, Jingui Institute (one of the most formal top few at present), Pan Asia (you should have heard of this digging limb), the last period of the exchange (one of the most formal top few at present), Dashang (one of the most formal top few in the world) and so on, there is an element of luck in this kind of place trading, of course, I don't say it, but when you encounter Pan Asia, please go to the toilet to cry and faint

Investment is risky and should be traded with caution.

About rice cultivation.

For technical questions, you.

Agricultural scientists can be consulted.