The delivery rider responded that it cost more than 300,000 yuan to repair the Rolls Royce, which is

In ordinary life, if we don't pay attention to complying with traffic accidents, a little carelessness will cause a tragedy, like now the delivery rider crashed into a Rolls-Royce, this matter has caused a lot of discussion among netizens. Some people think that the takeaway brother crashed into Rolls-Royce because he did not obey the traffic rules, and some people think that Rolls-Royce did not give way to the battery car, which led to such a situation.

For takeaway brothers, the orders they receive are generally distributed to them by the platform, and the platform will also choose the nearest route for them to find their destination. Therefore, many of them are prone to some traffic accidents when delivering takeaways, because they will run red lights or go on a rampage in order to reduce their deductions in a hurry. Not only does it have a great impact on traffic enforcement, but it is also prone to danger.

This crash may be that the takeaway brother ran a red light to prevent overtime, resulting in a collision with an oncoming Rolls-Royce, and such a thing happened.

Rolls-Royce reason For many people, once they see such news, their first reaction is that Rolls-Royce should take pity on the takeaway brother and give up compensation. But for the owner of the Rolls-Royce, he did nothing wrong, but was touched by the takeaway brother who touched his car, not only to spend his own maintenance money, but also to a certain extent, he was scolded by netizens. In normal times, if he obeys the traffic rules, then the delivery boy who crashes into his car must go through legal procedures, not because he is pitiful, we have to sympathize with him and reduce his compensation.

Regardless of who is wrong in this matter, we should follow the legal procedures instead of standing on the moral high ground to criticize.

Rationally we mainly need to look at this matter rationally, because this matter is not a matter of the poor and the rich, but a matter of abiding by the traffic rules. If we have reason to criticize either side when both sides are not following the traffic rules, but if the owner of the Rolls-Royce obeys the traffic rules, then we should not morally kidnap him and make him more responsible.

This matter is the fault of two people, Rolls-Royce has a certain mistake, of course, the delivery rider also has a certain error, and the inspection has been involved in the investigation of this matter.

This incident should be the responsibility of Rolls-Royce, because the delivery rider is going straight normally, this Rolls-Royce is turning right, and it is Rolls-Royce who violates traffic rules.

This matter is still under investigation, and each has its own reason, and I think it should be investigated, and then through the corresponding evidence, we can investigate who is responsible.

Both are at fault, and if it weren't for the fact that there was no attention to the issue of speed, this kind of accident would not have occurred, so both are at fault.

The takeaway rider responded that it cost more than 300,000 yuan to repair the Rolls-Royce, and the reporter contacted him at noon on July 18Rider Mr. Shaw。Dry file sue Mr. Xiaotold reporters that the incident happened on July 15, when it was himself who was going straight normally, and he collided with a right-turning motor vehicle in the normal straight drive。Mr. Xiao revealed that he is currently hospitalized in the hospital and is in stable conditionThe relevant expenses will be paid in advance by the company, and the relevant insurance will be applied for later

At present, the traffic police have not completed the judgment of responsibility, but according to Article 52, Paragraph 3 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of China, motor vehicles pass through intersections without traffic signal control and no traffic police command, and turning motor vehicles give way to vehicles going straight.

Riders violating traffic rules are not uncommon

In the context of the continuous compression of takeaway delivery time, it is not uncommon for riders to violate traffic rules, and accidents are endless. Previously, it was reported that in the first half of 2017, data from the Traffic Police Corps of the Shanghai Municipal Public Security Bureau showed that in Shanghai, there was an average of 1 delivery rider per day. In the same year, there were 12 takeaway riders in Shenzhen within 3 months.

In 2018, the Chengdu traffic police investigated and punished nearly 10,000 riders for violating the law and making fools in 7 months, 196 accidents, and 155 people, with an average of 1 rider per day for violating the law. In September 2018, the Guangzhou traffic police investigated and dealt with nearly 2,000 traffic violations by food delivery riders, with Meituan accounting for half and Ele.me ranking second.

Many takeaway brothers are working tirelessly every day to deliver takeaway to people in the streets and alleys of the city, and these takeaway brothers are in a hurry because the time for each meal delivery is very limited. If you are in a hurry on the road, it is easy to have traffic accidents. According to news reports, there was a takeaway brother in Guangdong who crashed into a Rolls-Royce worth 6 million in the process of delivering food.

Because the value of this car is very high, the maintenance cost is as high as more than 300,000, and many people are very curious, who should be responsible for the more than 300,000? So about the takeaway brother hitting a 6 million Rolls-Royce, and the maintenance cost is as high as more than 300,000, who should compensate? Here's what I think:

1. In this case, the specific liability for compensation has not yet been determined.

In this accident, because the responsibilities of both parties are very difficult to define, there is no division of responsibility at present. So at the moment, we don't know who is responsible for this compensation.

Second, the takeaway brother was an accident that occurred in the course of work and should be compensated by the company.

However, the takeaway brother usually buys insurance, and the takeaway brother also had an accident on the way to work. Therefore, even if the responsibility lies with the takeaway brother, this compensation should be compensated by the company where the takeaway brother works. Otherwise, the rights and interests of these employees cannot be protected.

3. I hope that all takeaway guys can pay attention to safety.

Because of the setting of many takeaway mechanisms, almost all takeaway brothers need to be in a hurry when delivering food, otherwise, they may need to compensate. Although it is very important to make money, I still hope that all the takeaway guys can pay attention to safety. It is also hoped that the current takeaway mechanism can be changed to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the takeaway brother.

Takeaway guy. Because this is an accident caused by the negligence of the takeaway brother, it should be compensated by the takeaway brother.

You Yuansong should be compensated by the person in charge of Shen Zheng, the takeaway brother, because these takeaway brothers have a certain amount of insurance, and they should take the insurance crack to protect everyone's rights and interests, and no one will be injured.

It should be after the jujube ruler has seen the surveillance video, and then decide who will compensate, I think the stool is so high that this takeaway sock finger brother should compensate, because he was too fast to see the traffic light.

It should be compensated by the takeaway brother, because this is the responsibility of the takeaway brother, so it can only be borne by him.

This matter must have been compensated by Brother Zeze, and the takeaway brother also admitted at the time that it was due to a fault of his that he crashed into this Laosheng Sless.

On July 18, a clear wisdomA takeaway brother in Zhanjiang, Guangdong Province hit a Rolls-Royce worth more than 6 million on the streetThe news is on the hot search. According to the source, the car belonged to a local car dealership. According to the staff of the car dealership:

At that time, Rolls-Royce was going straight, and the takeaway guy rushed up and hit itIt takes about three or four hundred thousand to repair the vehicle

At noon on the 18th, the reporter contacted the rider Mr. Xiao. Mr. Xiao told reporters that the incident happened on July 15, when it was himself who was going straight normally, and he collided with a right-turning motor vehicle in the normal straight drive. Mr. Xiao revealed that he is currently hospitalized in the hospital and his injuries are stable, and the relevant expenses will be paid by the company in advance, and he will apply for relevant insurance in the future.

On July 18, a Jimu News reporter learned from the Zhanjiang Traffic Police Department in Guangdong Province that the responsibility for the accident has not yet been determined.

However, according to Article 52, Paragraph 3 of China's "Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law", when a motor vehicle passes through an intersection without traffic signal control and no traffic police command, the turning motor vehicle gives way to the vehicle going straight ahead.

Netizens are hotly discussed:

The takeaway guy is too hard to compensate.

Whoever bears the responsibility will bear it.

If you think the takeaway guy is pitiful, you can help him pay for it.

Although I feel sorry for the takeaway brother, I am responsible for determining who the Shizheng clan should be.

What is the 6 million Rolls-Royce bullying the takeaway guy.

The above content refers to Beiqing.com The takeaway brother who bumped into 6 million Rolls-Royce is fully responsible, and the maintenance fee is 300,000 yuan? Traffic police responded.

This matter has not yet been determined, but let the takeaway brother take full responsibility and pay more than 300,000 repair fees for Rolls-Royce, which is completely a rumor circulating on the Internet, according to the situation at the time, the takeaway brother is going straight at the intersection normally, and Rolls-Royce is going to turn at the intersection, both sides did not see each other, which led to the impact, the takeaway brother did not violate the traffic rules, how can he be fully responsible?

Rolls-Royce owners and takeaway guys are responsible:In terms of the form at that time, in fact, if you have to say who has a problem, in fact, it is that the Rolls-Royce owner and the takeaway brother have some problems, at that intersection, there was no traffic light indication, and the Rolls-Royce is a normal right turn, the takeaway brother is also normal straight, both sides have not violated the traffic rules, but China's traffic rules have explained, at the intersection without signal lights, should slow down, and the turning vehicle should take the initiative to avoid the straight vehicle, let the straight vehicle go first, here the problem comes, Rolls-Royce is precisely because it did not avoid the impact caused by the takeaway brother, it stands to reason that the owner of the Rolls-Royce bears a certain responsibility, but although the takeaway brother is going straight normally, he is driving fast, which should be the reason for the faster delivery of the takeaway, of course, this is also the reason why the takeaway brother did not brake the car in time, and finally collided with the Rolls-Royce, at the intersection should slow down, but the takeaway brother did not slow down, at high speed, want to go straight through the intersection, in this case, The takeaway guy should also bear some responsibility.

At present, the traffic police have not yet determined their responsibility:According to what I said above, in fact, both parties have a certain amount of responsibility, as reported on the Internet, it is completely untrustworthy to let the takeaway brother be fully responsible, and to pay more than 300,000 repair costs, and the takeaway brother also suffered a lot of injuries because of the Rolls-Royce, it is reasonable to make him fully responsible, according to me, the medical expenses of the takeaway brother should be borne by Rolls-Royce, and the repair cost of Rolls-Royce should also be borne by both parties. Of course, as for whether the takeaway brother needs to pay the repair fee or not, it is up to the traffic police to decide, what I am saying is just my idea, who the traffic police think is fully responsible, then that person should pay the repair cost of Rolls-Royce can not be shirked.

In this accident, the takeaway brother should bear the main responsibility, because he was driving at a relatively fast speed, and there was a mistake in judgment, so he crashed into the car.

The culmination of responsibility for this accident is still undecided, so we cannot jump to conclusions in this case.

After the analysis and handling of the traffic accident in this incident, it has been determined that the takeaway brother is fully responsible for this accident.

There is a time requirement for the takeaway brother to deliver the food, so the takeaway brother must deliver this thing to the customer's hands within the specified time of the platform. Otherwise, it is very likely to face bad reviews, and if it is said that once it is badly reviewed by customers, then the takeaway brother is also about to be compensated, or fined. Therefore, you can also find that the takeaway brother on the road is very fast.

What happened: In Zhanjiang, Guangdong, there was a takeaway brother who didn't see the Rolls-Royce car during the delivery process, so he hit it directly. And this time, the maintenance fee is as high as 300,000, which is very terrible for a delivery brother who works ordinarily. But judging from **, the Rolls-Royce car was turning at that time, and the takeaway brother was going straight According to our country's traffic law, turning is to let the straight vehicle go first.

At that time, when the owner of the Rolls-Royce was at the entrance, the speed of the car was also very fast. And did not pay attention to whether there were cars on either side, if this is the case, the owner of the Rolls-Royce himself needs to bear most of the responsibility.

Details of the collision between the two sidesAnd in this matter, the traffic police have not judged who is responsible, but we will find that the Rolls-Royce is indeed equivalent to turning right, and the takeaway brother is also going straight. Whether it is a motor vehicle or a non-motor vehicle, it is necessary to pay attention. Now there are a lot of traffic accidents in the takeaway brother, and there have been many such incidents in Guangzhou alone.

No matter how anxious you are, you should put your life first. Compensation is still a trivial matter, if you really lose your life, what should the people in the family do?

The traffic police did not determine the division of responsibility for this matter, which is also very troublesome, because the owner of the Rolls-Royce is indeed in a small alley and is about to turn right. The takeaway brother is walking directly, without any turns, through the traffic laws of our country, then, the turning vehicle must be courtesy to the straight vehicle. However, both sides said that they were executing and did not turn around, so it still depends on how the traffic police should judge this time.