In the finals alone, who is more dominant between O Neal and Jordan?

I think Michael Jordan, the "God of Basketball", and O'Neal, the "Big Shark", have always been the two most dominant players in the basketball field, but if I make a distinction before these two people to find out who is the more dominant one, then I am more inclined to choose Jordan, after all, "there is Joe to choose Joe" and "no Joe to choose the shark", in the impression of most fans, Jordan is more dominant than O'Neal.

The Finals can be said to be the most high-level series in the NBA and even in the entire basketball field, and the Finals is the final competition between the two championship teams in the East and West, and it is a stage that all teams and stars in the NBA yearn for. In the finals, the confrontation is more intense, the fan atmosphere is stronger, and the defense is tougher, so the stage of the finals can really test the strength of a star.

Jordan has played in the Finals a total of six times in his career, won all six games, and won all of them as FMVP, that is, the Most Valuable Player of the Finals; O'Neal has also played in the Finals six times, but has won four of six and won three FMVPs. In a simple comparison, both have played in the Finals six times, but Jordan has not lost and O'Neal has lost twice, which proves something. In '95, third-year O'Neal and Penny Hardaway made it to the finals together, but were beaten by Olajuwon 4:

0 Sweep; In '04, the Lakers "F4" was defeated 4-1 by the Pistons; In '06, O'Neal and Wade defeated the Mavericks together, but in this game, Wade played exceptionally well and beat O'Neal to become FMVP.

If you only compare the three finals that O'Neal won with Jordan's six finals, there is actually no big advantage. Jordan has the advantage in points per game, while O'Neal has the advantage in rebounding. But Jordan averaged 41 points, rebounds and assists per game in the 93 Finals, and his performance was too eye-catching, and Jordan also left miracles such as "the shot" and "the last shot" in the Finals, showing his dominance in the Finals.

Jordan was more dominant. Jordan's performance in the Finals was even better than in the regular season, and he was completely dominant on both offensive and defensive ends, and was the key to the team's victory.

Jordan is even more dominant, Jordan has never lost in the Finals, and has won the championship in all six Finals appearances.

Needless to say, Jordan is more dominant. His firepower is not dead, he is capable of turning the tide anytime and anywhere, and he creates attacking opportunities himself. The shark is the center, and he has to wait for someone to feed the ball. Cut off his receiving route, and the man is useless.

I think Jordan is more dominant because he has won six championships and six MVPs, and there is absolutely no doubt about his dominance.

On the whole, Jordan must be much stronger than O'Neal, first of all, O'Neal didn't have the kind of dominance in the early 21st century in the 90s, the reason why O'Neal can have such a terrifying dominance in the early 21st century is because strong interior lines such as Big Dream Olajuwon, Admiral Robinson, Ewing, Karl Malone are no longer at their peak, and O'Neal was at his peak at that time, and no one on the inside line could control O'Neal at that time, so O'Neal showed such a terrifying dominance, In the 90s, when those strong interior lines were at their peak, they didn't see how terrifying O'Neal's dominance was, in the four major centers, O'Neal was still ranked behind Olajuwon and Robinson, and ranked third among the four centers, don't say anything O'Neal's 90s were not his peak, the United States' evaluation of O'Neal is the peak of his debut, and he took 25+17 data in his rookie period, you told me that he was not at his peak in the 90s? Peak O'Neal was once educated by the peak dream Olajuwon on the backhand, both offensive and defensive ends were completely suppressed, the Lakers' OK combination is strong, but in the hands of the Jazz led by Malone and Stockton, it is the share of being swept, and Jordan is different, the NBA in the 90s has such a sentence "Supergiant dominates the league, Jordan rules Supergiant" It can be seen how terrifying Jordan's dominance is, in the 90s, a group of old hooligans who were at their peak held two triple championships in their hands, can't they prove their dominance, Magic Johnson Glider Barkley Glove Payton Carl Malone Big Dream Olajuwon Admiral Robinson Ewing O'Neal, etc., Jordan can still win two triple championships in the peak of these people, I firmly believe that O'Neal can't do it, O'Neal really didn't do it, O'Neal repeatedly fell under these people in the 90s, and the superstars of the 90s are no longer at their peak At the end of his career or even after retiring, O'Neal can show such a terrifying dominance.

Jordan is far inferior to O'Neal, everyone shoots two-pointers, O'Neal has a higher shooting percentage, and O'Neal can still protect the basket and do dirty work. Jordan is completely unqualified to play guard, the guard should play at the high three-point line, Jordan can only shrink under the basket because of too many shots, the team with Jordan is equal to no guard, and the whole team shrinks under the basket The opponent is good to help defend. The role of the guard in the team is to shoot from a distance and give bonuses to his teammates on the inside, and Jordan's ability in this area is zero or even negative.

If it were me, I would choose Jordan, because O'Neal had a fatal mistake of being prone to free throws, so the overall level would definitely be Jordan's superior.

Personally, I think Jordan's overall strength is stronger.

Compared with Jordan's basketball skills and O'Neal, O'Neal has a certain gap, and O'Neal is dwarfed by just shooting.

The purpose of playing in the Jordan era is to win, don't take care of the young and don't take care of the old, I'll subdue you when you play, and if you can't knock out, how can the stars shine in this period, take care of each other, I'm on my team, not my team? Let's talk about it when we die.

In those years, when it came to critical moments, the Lakers coaching staff was in a dilemma, and sometimes they had to put O'Neal on the bench and let Kobe Bryant lead the team, and the weakness of free throw instability was too easy to target.

Not to mention basketball technical ability, this is a bit of a bully. Let's talk about the appeal of selling tickets, the old hooligan is the best choice.

Jordan can build a dynasty in an era when the big four centers are rampant, and that's reason enough.

O'Neal, because O'Neal can dominate in an era when the interior is like a forest.

O'Neal is convinced and admired by Jordan.

First, location. Laker O'Neal is a traditional heavy center, running slowly and squatting, and the defense is mostly squatting. Due to the limitation of position, he often can't catch the ball because of the bag in the attack.

But Jordan faces the bag after receiving the ball, the options are very rich, you can dribble slowly, choose jump shots, back hits, breakthroughs or passes, and O'Neal is a center, and you must prevent outside players from helping to cut the ball, so basically you have to deal with it after receiving the racket three or four times, either turn around and hook or dunk, or pass it out immediately, so that your room to play is limited, that is, Jordan is less restricted on the court, more free, has more ball, and has more scoring explosiveness.

Second, the offensive aspect. O'Neal's offensive range is limited, and his technical shortcomings are obvious. Often out of the trap now O'Neill is stuck out of range of the bag, only Bi Yan can barely shoot.

O'Neal's range of attack is not out of the paint area, in fact, even in the paint area close to the free throw line, O'Neal's hook and throw will become very unmarked, and the free throw is known to be bad, resulting in rampant shark slashing tactics and easy to pit at critical moments for the team. In contrast, Jordan's various techniques at both ends of the offensive and defensive ends, ball control, passing, changing direction, layups, jump shots, back play, without the ball, etc., are almost perfect and have no shortcomings, and the range covers the entire three-point line inside and outside, so it is more difficult to limit in offense. Jordan is not only a kaleidoscope, but also a deadly move.

Third, mentality. O'Neal's mentality is not as stable as Jordan's, and his fighting spirit is not as strong as Jordan's. Coupled with O'Neal's own free throws, fouls and other reasons, O'Neal is a person who is not very good at playing the fourth quarter among the historical supergiants.

But in the fourth quarter of the OK period, Kobe Bryant was often more brilliant. When it comes to scoring in the fourth quarter and key moments, Jordan is going to throw O'Neal off a lot.

Fourth, in terms of defensive areas. Jordan has 9 first-time defenders and DPOY, as well as steal kings, and is the top blocker among guards, one of the best outside defenders in history, and O'Neal only has a second-defense and is not the top interior defender in history. Jordan's defense still has no shortcomings, the history of single defense and co-defense is top, he is extremely good at steals and is not too out of position, he moves fast and has a pair of big hands, he is extremely oppressive, and the block is also the top among guards.

O'Neal's role in the offensive corner is unparalleled, but it will be clunky and cumbersome on defense, but he has unparalleled dominance, and Jordan can open up the opponent's defensive formation, can also cut the opponent's offensive bond, has a suffocating defensive ability, and is stronger in all aspects.

O'Neal is known as the inside giant, and his power and tonnage are quite powerful, and he is a very dominant center. Jordan's three-point shot is quite powerful, and he is known as the god of basketball.

There are gaps in bounce power, shooting accuracy, athleticism, physical fitness, and teamwork.

Jordan is the boss, O'Neal is the second, there is no comparison.

There is a gap in terms of teammates!

These are two retired basketball superstars, one of them is Jordan, who holds two or two triple championships, and the other is O'Neal, who holds a triple championship.

Maybe you still have a lot of answers in mind, Chamberlain, Russell, Iverson, Kobe Cong Ying, James, Durant, Curry, etc. But when it comes to epoch-making superstars, they must be god-like beings in that era, but the technical statistics of Chamberlain and Russell's era are not so perfect, and I can only look at some video materials, I can't judge whether they are epoch-making basketball superstars. Iverson and Kobe Bryant have retired, but in terms of historical rankings, what they have achieved is not enough to be called epoch-making.

The rest are in their playing years, and the most likely to be called epoch-making basketball superstars should be James and Curry. Among them, one is working towards the first place in various data history, and the other has done the projection to the extreme. The only two of them are most likely to stand shoulder to shoulder with Jordan O'Neal in the future.

James wants to be a little more likely.

Why are Jordan and O'Neal the epoch-making basketball superstars in my mind? I think it's important to start with their achievements and influence.

Achievement: Jordan, the Bulls dynasty with two triple championships.

O'Neal, the Lakers dynasty with a triple rock clump crown in his hand.

Jordan: I've never played a tie-break in the finals with my opponent.

O'Neal: In '01, he swept all the Western teams and defeated the 76ers 4-1 in the finals to win the championship.

Influence: The meaning that Jordan gives to basketball is far greater than basketball, and even when everyone mentions basketball, the first reaction of mentioning the NBA is Jordan. The economic crisis in the United States can be recovered by Jordan's comeback, although it is a bit exaggerated, but it shows Jordan's influence.

O'Neal's significance to basketball is to make the league change the rules of basketball by O'Neal many times. O'Neal asked the league to reinstate joint defense tactics, three-second violations, set up reasonable collision zones, and so on. When it comes to basketball centers in the true sense of the word, it has to be O'Neal.

Perhaps in the near future, James and Curry may appear on this list alongside these two, but with their current results, they are far from enough to compete with these two superstars.

I think it should be O'Neill. The shark at his peak is an existence that can crush a team by himself, and although James is strong, he has 3 championships. Be reasonable. Although he is FMVP, it is not because of his dominance alone.

This must be O'Neill.

In the Union. Who can resist O'Neill at his peak, there were almost no opponents at that time.

Even during the Heat period, O'Neal had begun to decline, but he still helped Wade win a championship.

At its peak?? Then I personally think these two people are comparable. I'm Jamie, I'm not going to take sides, O'Neal's Lakers dominance was the all-time best among centers, unbeatable.

Let's talk about James. 07 Single-core vs. Pistons One person scored 29 points in a row to dominate the game and finally lost to the Spurs. That would be too strong for GDP.

There is also the sixth game of James vs. Celtic, which is the masterpiece of James' career. One man scored 45 points, 15 rebounds and 5 assists to dominate the game. There are many, many more that are not covered one by one on the dominance of both of these guys.

There is no way to make a comparison, the inside and outside, the positions are different, if you have to compare, my personal feeling is that James, James can better drive the performance of the whole team, and O'Neal is almost in this regard.

The two people in different positions are both NBA superstars, and both of them have their own peaks, O'Neal is mainly the interior hegemon, and he has also changed the NBA rules, and James is mainly influential and all-round.

O'Neal All teams will arrange three big men for O'Neal, and he only has 18 big points and six fouls for one person in defense

Single-core James is more dominant.

Single-core James can lead the team to the finals, while O'Neal can only grab rebounds and score under the basket, as long as the opponent restricts O'Neal, O'Neal's team will not be able to play, and James is too versatile, he can play in all five positions, not only scoring, grabbing rebounds, but also assists, steals, and blocks.

What is better, in terms of comprehensive data, James crushes, and in terms of three-pointers, Curry dumps James on the street.

If Kobe Bryant and James Bby Bibi, Wade and James Bibi, there is still comparability Anthony, forget it... The eyes of the masses are bloody, and in recent years, it has been a big drama for James to fight Kobe! If Anthony is better than James, shouldn't it have become Anthony against Kobe Bryant a long time ago?

Scoring ability, comparable rebounds, assists, awareness, Anthony is much worse than James.

The two of them can be said to be half a pound, if you really want to compare, James is slightly better, because James is more comprehensive and has a better overall view of the overall situation, and Durant is slightly worse than James in terms of passing and driving teammates. In other respects, he is not on par with James.