Is the SLR telephoto lens better for Tamron or Sigma

Hello landlord. Let's see if I can help you.

First of all, for friends who play Canon or Nikon or Sony, Sigma and Tamron are both called vice-factory heads.

First of all, I will analyze according to your needs Since you choose to choose the original head, your requirements should only be enough, and there will be no too professional needs.

So I don't recommend you to choose the brand according to word of mouth, but according to the focal length, can be used, these two brands to be honest, each has its own merits, if you have to say that the telephoto personally thinks, Sigma mainly attacks the aperture, Tamron focuses on the focal length, if you buy a telephoto lens, there are two focal lengths I recommend you to choose Tamron's.

70-200 150-600 I'll analyze the advantages and disadvantages, I'm not that professional, so I can't give you an analysis from the lens and coating, because I have used a lot of lenses, and I happen to like to hunt birds, so I will analyze it for you from the use.

70-200 large aperture, cloudy days are easier to make, purely from the bird hunting, more convenient for the use of bad weather, the aperture is larger than two stops of shutter at least 200-500, but the focal length is relatively short, you can only choose the woods or the waterfowl lake in the zoo to play, the wetland 100% can not go, I have suffered from the pain of is Xiaobai, if the upper extender lens is not practical, how much the imaging deteriorates is not discussed, it becomes a constant aperture, and the value of buying this lens for birds has been lost. It's definitely a good choice for portraits, with a wide aperture, a strong cut at the telephoto end, and a good bokeh effect.

150-600 This lens has nothing to use, but according to the evaluation, the imaging is still good, the focal length is long enough, and it is enough to go to the football field, but you must use it on a tripod, **Very cheap, more than 6000 points, from the perspective of cost performance, no telephoto can be higher than this. But the portrait can never be shot, and it is too affected by the weather, cloudy or no sun, and the shutter speed cannot be increased, resulting in a very low film yield.

Sigma's 150-500 can also be considered more than 5000 points, but the comparison, if you are a half-frame and Tamron 150-600 ratio, it is more than worth the loss, saving 1000 dollars, losing 150 or 160 focal length.

I hope to help you, if you have a detailed question, how many focal lengths of the lens can be asked.

I think Tenglong is good, focusing on the focal length.

Tamron Lens Sigma Lens. Who has the best quality?

Tamron and Sigma are the two major sub-factory lens brands in Japan, and the earlier lenses are worse than Tamron lenses in terms of optical quality and process quality, especially in terms of machining technology, cable life and quality control, which have the most problems. Later, Sigma launched a new lens with the EX logo, and the optical quality was greatly improved, but there was still a lot of room for improvement in the processing technology. Now Sigma's new lens feels like it has caught up in all aspects, both in terms of optical quality and process materials.

Especially the ART series, which is not inferior to the original lens in all aspects. Tamron's SP series lenses have always been of consistent quality, and now new lenses have changed their decades-old appearance to modern fashion, such as its SP 15-30mm F VC G2.

Sigma has some head imaging is acceptable, but the appearance of the workmanship is generally very poor, the paint is off, and the zoom head wipes the lens barrel, so Sigma is suitable for buying fixed focus, and the overall appearance of the sigma head is relatively large, and there are many heads that are larger than the original.

Tamron is one of the world's top three CCTV lens brands. It is designed and manufactured by the world-renowned professional lens manufacturer, Tenglong Co., Ltd. Tenglong CCTV lens is known for its aspherical technology, and is well-known for its excellent imaging, small size, and large light transmission.

Tamron Tenglong, one of the world's top three CCTV lens brands. Tenglong CCTV lens is known for its aspherical technology, and is well-known for its excellent imaging, small size, and large light transmission.

Founded on November 1, 1950, Tenglong Co., Ltd. is a world-renowned professional lens manufacturer, including camera lenses, camcorder lenses, digital camera lenses, CCTV lenses, etc. It was capitalized at JPY 3.6 billion. In 2003, the company had sales of 54 billion yen and had nearly 2,000 employees.

Business outlets and offices include Tokyo, Osaka, Sapporo, Tohoku, Niigata, Chubu and Fukuoka; Overseas USA, Germany, France, Hong Kong, Shanghai, etc.

Of course, Canon's lens is good.

Canon lenses have a long history dating back to 1933 and have been leading the way in the industry.

We continue to introduce various new technologies in terms of lenses.

The advantages of Canon lenses are as follows:

1. The lens system is complete.

From ultra advertising to telephoto, from prime to zoom, Canon basically has the lens you need.

2. The lens is of high quality.

Canon red circle lenses have become a symbol of quality in the industry.

3. Canon lenses and Canon SLRs work better.

Because the lens is for Canon SLR cameras, the Canon lens fits better.

For example, in focusing, the original lens is significantly more reliable.

The Tamron lens is also commonly known as the "deputy head", which can be said to be a lens with a high performance ratio.

The Tamron lens belongs to 1950 and has developed rapidly in recent years, but there have always been problems with the lens.

The electronic and mechanical aspects are a bit worse, focusing is slow in the dark, and the focus is loud.

Almost. It must be slightly better than maybe Tamoro. Because Canon has camera support.

If you don't understand, you must buy the original brand. Therefore, if Tenglong didn't have two brushes, he wouldn't be able to gain a foothold and still grow bigger. Someone who would make you think about it with a Canon camera like this already speaks for itself.

If you want me to say that you don't have to use filters for DSLR photography now. All can be psed in post-production. It's freewheeling and works much better. Add a soft focus effect to see if the effect is not good, and you can go back. If you add a filter, the effect is not good, and it's over.

Tamron used to be the best in the vice-factory

Not anymore, not even an ultrasonic motor

It's not as good as Sigma's

You can buy either a Canon original or a Sigma one

The best filter is the German B+W, but ** is a bit high, buy a Kenkel multi-coated UV mirror can buy according to your lens caliber

Tenglong is cheap, there is no money to consider.

Canon's original lenses, as long as they are circled in red.

Tamron can't compare.

You can use a diffuser lens to take portraits, but this effect is easy to make with PS.

In the past, the quality of sub-factory lenses like Sigma and Tamron was average.

Now, whether it is Sigma or Tamron, its lenses developed and produced have made great progress, and they are at least not bad compared to the original lenses.

In the field of telephoto lenses, Sigma is a little better than Tamron ......Sigma's sports series telephoto 150-600sports lens is very good!

Both in terms of quantity and quality, Sigma is ahead of the curve.

For example, Sigma's famous submarine 200-500, which exceeds 15 kg, is indeed a heavyweight.

The strength of Sigma is in the operation, or to be more precise, in focus.

The advantage of the Tamron 180 lies in imaging and workmanship, and the Sigma one is indeed slightly inferior to this in terms of optics, but the gap is not big.

Both of these have a small problem, and they can't be used in a relatively narrow place.

Many people will tell you that the macro is focused manually, in fact, it is not right, generally speaking, it is more convenient to focus first and then manually fine-tune, Sigma has an ultrasonic motor that can focus manually all the time, which is indeed very useful, especially when you capture bugs. However, this point is not perfect for Sigma Dawei, there is no focus stroke lock.

As for the Tamron 180, it won't disappoint you if you can stand to use this head entirely as a manual head. But its autofocus is really worrying.,It's so loud and heartbreaking.,It's slow.,The most important thing is that there's no full-time manual focus.,It takes two steps to switch between automatic and manual on the top of the Nikon fuselage.,The bugs ran early.,I just couldn't stand this at the beginning.,But this head is really close to the top macro bull head.。

As for the Nikon 60 macro, it is not the same use as the first two, the main thing is that the angle of view is different, and the shortest focusing distance is different. The shorter the focal length, the wider the angle of view, the more convenient it is to have more background information in it, the shorter the recent focusing distance means that you have to get closer if you want to play 1:1, it is easy to affect the lighting, and it is easy to scare the bugs away, the longer the focal length, the less background information, the longer the recent focusing distance, of course it is more advantageous to shoot bugs, but it is difficult to shoot some ambient macro (the kind with more background), of course, there is another point, the longer the focal length, the higher the safety shutter requirements, and the higher the requirements for the stability of the tripod.

In fact, there is a cost-effective choice, Sigma 150 micro, which is basically the same as Sigma large and micro, but there is a focus stroke lock, the focal length is shorter but not too short, enough to ensure a safe distance between the bugs, and the safety shutter is lowered by a grade to make the handheld become more successful. It's also easier to cast in a slightly narrower area. Of course, this head is also cheaper.

Here are some ** you can see for yourself, the color and shadow are on it.

Sigma 150 micro:

Tamron 180 micro.

The Sigma 180 micro Mowgli club has not been found for the time being, and there have been before, and maybe the horse gang has gone to play 150 micro.

Added:1 Sigma 150 is coming out with a version with anti-shake, although the price of anti-shake will definitely increase, but it can be considered.

2 Sigma's current 150 micro and 180 micro have the phenomenon of peeling, which affects the appearance and also affects the value preservation.

3 Tenglong now has an ultrasonic motor, with an ultrasonic motor and VC anti-shake 180 micro will come out sooner or later, but how long it will take is unknown, and after it comes out**I don't know, if you are not in a hurry to use it, and you don't care**, you can consider waiting and seeing.

Sigma and Tamron are similar.

It's not good to compare with 60 micro, because their purpose is different, what do you want to shoot?

Generally speaking, the longer the macro is better, because if the focal length is too short, it will not be possible to photograph live insects, and there will be a gap in magnification and bokeh.

If you only shoot still life at close range, 60 micro is okay.

Personally, it is advisable that the macro should not be too short. At least get a Tamron 90 micro.

The suburbs of Sigma I think it's better. Sigma's 70mm macro is stronger than Nikon's 60mm, and that's for sure.

It's a good feeling to have used a Tamoro, but if you're using it specifically for macro then there's no comparison.