GDP1000 3,000 per capita period

On the one hand, it shows that the national wealth and national wealth have risen to a new stage, from the perspective of development, it is forward and progressive, and it will inevitably bring about new and higher needs of material and spirituality. But from another point of view, from the perspective of national conditions, the concept of per capita covers up the reality of the imbalance underneath, and with the development, this imbalance, the imbalance will expand in relative quantity, in addition, the overall development will also cover up the local non-development, if it is not paid attention to and solved, It will inevitably drag down and restrain development, but spending too much manpower, material and financial resources to solve these problems will also affect the speed and quality of development, so it will fall into a dilemma, so it is a period of prominent contradictions.

Everything has two sides, there are no absolute advantages, and there are no absolute disadvantages. The world is always developing in contradictions.

According to international experience, when the per capita GDP of a country or region exceeds 3,000 US dollars, it usually means that the people generally have the satisfaction of basic living needs and the provision of basic social services. This is because the per capita GDP of a country or region reflects the level of economic development and the level of people's livelihood in that country or region.

When the per capita GDP exceeds $3,000, it generally means improvements in the following aspects:

1.Basic living needs have been satisfied: people's living standards have been significantly improved, and basic living needs such as food, housing, medical care, and education have been basically satisfied.

2.Social services are provided: Social services such as health care, education, social welfare, etc. are enhanced. The provision of these services can help people better integrate into society and improve their quality of life.

3.People's economic income is improved: people's income level is improved, economic pressure is relieved, they can live more comfortably, and the demand for social services such as education and health care can also be increased.

Of course, a per capita GDP of more than 3,000 US dollars is not the end of a country's or region's economic development, it is only a sign of a stage, and countries and regions also need to make continuous efforts to further improve people's living standards and the quality of social services, and achieve sustainable economic development and social progress.

It is gratifying that the per capita GDP of Chinese has exceeded $10,000 for two consecutive years.

I don't know how you feel when you hear this number. Thinking of dragging your feet? Or do you just think it's just a number, and it doesn't make any sense?

A GDP per capita of more than $10,000 means that our country has entered the ranks of upper-middle-income countries. But what does that mean for us? Let's go back in history and see what has changed when other countries have a GDP of more than $10,000.

When the per capita GDP of the United States exceeded $10,000, Hollywood ushered in the vigorous development of the bridge, and its ** era came.

In 1932, three years after the average Danes had a GDP of more than $10,000, Lego was born.

The boom in Japan's anime industry also came shortly after Japan's GDP per capita surpassed $10,000.

I looked through the materials and found that there is a definition of $10,000 per capita GDP in the field of economics: when a country's GDP per capita reaches $10,000, the country will usher in a booming cultural industry.

Is the era of the great development of our country's cultural industry coming? Let me start with a few quiz questions.

Have you noticed that the Chinese film industry has seen a steady stream of box-office records in recent years?

Have you noticed the increase in LEGO stores around you?

Do you have more and more friends around you who like to be with your hand?

Have you noticed an increase in the number of e-reading apps on the shelves?

If your answer is "yes", then we have every reason to believe that the Chinese people will usher in an era of vigorous cultural industry.

This is very much in line with the form of social development, when people meet their basic physiological and material needs, they will pursue spiritual pleasure and abundance.

What kind of opportunities does that bring us?

The biggest difference between the information age and the previous one is that people's time is very fragmented. The amount of information and the fast pace of work and life have led people to pay more attention to the cost of time.

In a society that values the cost of time and craves culture to nourish it, there is a trend towards rapid access to nutritious cultural content. What opportunities will arise from this trend? Everyone is welcome to brainstorm and discuss with the author.

Finally, let's look at this dialectically.

In other countries, the exchange rate of the US dollar is relatively high when the per capita GDP exceeds 10,000 US dollars. In layman's terms, the dollar is not as valuable as it used to be. Especially during the epidemic, the Federal Reserve released water, which led to the continuous decline of the US dollar in recent years, and the world entered an era of quasi-inflation.

In this case, whether the per capita GDP of Chinese exceeds 10,000 US dollars is not as good as before, this question needs to be considered. However, the author still believes that China is just around the corner to usher in an era of great cultural development. Are you ready?

Of course, right away, China's copy is developing rapidly

The degree is so fast, of course, it can be exceeded. At present, the per capita GDP of DU in China is 5,432 US dollars.

Now China's growth rate has broken 8, which can be said to be one of the lowest records in history since China's reform and opening up. For more than 30 years, the growth rate has been maintained at 10 percent, which is extremely stable, unlike other countries that are 10 percent this year and 3 percent that year, showing an unstable state. If you want to ** when China's per capita GDP exceeds 10,000 US dollars, it should be said that it is relatively easy.

Even if China's GDP growth rate is calculated at the worst **7.5%, it will definitely exceed the $10,000 mark by 2020. (Of course, kidding, this is impossible, because China's GDP growth rate cannot always be maintained at 7.5 percent, this year's major ** has reported that this year's GDP is very likely to be 7.8 percent, and China's GDP in the next year, it is entirely possible to reach 8 percent or even 9 percent in the future, China's economic development trend has been in a state of upward development, although the first quarter of this year is 7.5 percent.) If people remain above 9% like in 30 years again, I'm afraid they won't even need it for 5 years) It has been made clear that before 2016, China's imports and exports will strive to reach twice the total import and export volume in 2011.

Between 2013 and 2014, the GDP of the BRIC countries will surpass that of the United States.

Landlord you bai

Well, to the current Chinese du

From the perspective of national conditions, the breakthrough zhi 10,000 US dollars you said, and dao is doubling the current version of 5,000 US dollars, and I think it is difficult to do it before 2020. Here's why:

1.The population base is large, even if family planning is implemented, the population is still very large, and there are small villages like Yunnan and other places that cannot be managed, or many rural villages, each family has about 3 children, so no matter how high your total GDP is, the average is very low.

2.The development gap between the east and the west is too large, and the income of the whole society is pyramid-shaped, with few people with high incomes and the working class accounting for the majority.

3.Although China's total GDP is the second largest in the world, with a total of 8 trillion US dollars, it is still 1 times less than the US 16 trillion US dollars.

From my personal point of view, if China wants to reach the GDP of 10,000 US dollars in human settlements, it should be around 2030, when the Chinese population is about 8-1.2 billion, and the total GDP is about 12 trillion US dollars.

Since there are no specific statistics, it is not possible to determine the exact time. However, according to relevant statistics, in 2018, China's per capita GDP has reached about 4,000 US dollars, which is also the highest level in recent years. Previously, relevant reports pointed out that in 2016, the per capita GDP of Chinese had reached 3,668 US dollars, while in 2014, the per capita GDP of Chinese was 3,307 US dollars.

Therefore, it can be inferred that around 2016, China's per capita GDP reached the level of about $4,000. If you want to calculate accurately, you may need to consider statistics from recent years.

I don't think it's worth any reference for people.

Because GDP per capita does not fully reflect a country's actual output. GDP per capita does not fully reflect a country's real standard of living. GDP per capita does not explain income distribution.

The rapid expansion of per capita GDP on paper has not brought about the effect of paper on paper, the problem may be first of all, the per capita value of GDP in many cities is so high, because these cities often only count the local permanent population, and do not include a large number of foreign populations in the scope of statistics, such as statistics, Guangzhou's permanent population is more than 12 million, but the actual resident population has exceeded 16 million, and the foreign population has reached more than 30 million, and these people do not enjoy good public resources.

In addition, policies such as income distribution and social security are far from catching up with the growth rate of GDP and other similar statistics, and there is still a big gap between them and countries where people's living standards are truly rich. There are four indicators for the developed world, that is, high per capita GDP, developed industrial technology, scientific and technological progress, and high social welfare. Therefore, it is more meaningful to speed up the reform of the income distribution system, rationally transform national wealth into personal wealth, and truly do good things for the people than to "publish data".

Leaving aside the external factors of statistical caliber and distribution system, the most important thing is the internal factors of the economic development model. In a sense, the industrial structure determines the income level of workers, which in turn directly affects the living standards of residents. Our country's economic growth is mainly driven by investment, so the fruits of development do not directly benefit local residents, which explains why in energy cities like Ordos, residents' living standards are not matched by higher GDP per capita, which is driven by state-owned enterprises.

Let's take a look at a city with little investment, such as Shenzhen. The economic impetus comes from high-tech industries and high value-added industries, which play an important role in local economic growth. This kind of industrial and future-oriented industrial layout can not only maintain the stability of local economic growth, but also help to ensure the living standards of local residents.

In fact, even if the standard of living of urban dwellers can really match the high per capita GDP of the local area, there is nothing to show off. You must know that the value of any data is far less than the "careful care" that residents receive in medical care, transportation, unemployment, pension, etc.

Yes. Because the per capita GDP reflects the average level of our society, there is a certain reference value.

Of course, there is reference value, and per capita GDP has great reference value, because it is related to people's living standards.

Of course, there is reference value. It can reflect the people's consumption level from the side.

There is no reference value, the gap between the rich and the poor in China is very large, and most of the wealth is concentrated in the hands of the rich, resulting in the majority of the poor in China, and the per capita GDP is only the average wealth of China, which cannot represent the level of personal wealth in China.

Yes, this is because this value is based on the integration of big data, and then according to certain evaluation criteria, the final value is obtained.

The fourth is in terms of travel. We used to stay in one place for the rest of our lives. Traveling is something that only rich people can do.

And now many ordinary people can travel out by car. People can spend their income on enjoyment. Engel's coefficient has increased.

You don't have to spend all your income on food and clothing. In short, our lives are getting better and better.

One of the most important manifestations is that many people now have their own cars at home, which is a manifestation of the improvement of the economic level.

China's development is obvious to all, and China's per capita GDP has successfully exceeded $10,000 this year, which is a great progress. The people's living standards have improved a lot, which is reflected in every aspect of food, clothing, housing and transportation, and it is also much richer in spirit.

Personally, I think that this may be more or less related to everyone's living standard and quality, especially in terms of eating, and social welfare.

It means that China's rise and the improvement of people's income and quality, China's comprehensive well-off strategy will be further completed, which means that China's international status has been improved, and it also demonstrates China's strength.

It means that the living standards of the Chinese people are getting higher and higher, and everyone is living a happy life.

This shows that China's development is very rapid, and China's residents have stepped into a moderately prosperous society.