Is it better to have a single camera Sony or Nikon

Hello, I am now using a Canon 600D, generally speaking, it is enough to use, and it does not feel heavy from time to time, I personally recommend that as long as you have more money on hand, you can start a DSLR SLR camera has a reflector and a pentaprism, and the light passes through the lens, and then through the reflection of the reflector and pentaprism, and finally reaches the eye, so the scene we see from the optical viewfinder travels at the speed of light, very fast. Single-camera cameras do not have mirrors and pentaprisms, and what we see on the electronic display or electronic viewfinder actually comes from the signals transmitted from the circuit. Therefore, single-camera cameras have the following shortcomings:

1. Imaging hysteresis. This is because the development of a single electric battery needs to go through two inverted signal conversions, and it also takes time for the external circuit to be transmitted. In other words, the image observed by the electronic viewfinder actually comes from the electrical signal transmitted in the circuit and converted from the optical signal.

Although this lag is subtle and difficult to detect, it is very important for a good photographer to be accurately framed, which is why most photographers currently prefer DSLRs. 2. Large power consumption. The monoelectric uses an electronic viewfinder system, which results in greater power consumption.

Although manufacturers will take this into account and take some measures accordingly, the expansion of the battery will undoubtedly bring about an increase in the weight of the whole machine, and people are more willing to choose energy-saving ways to create photography under the concept of environmental protection.

Of course, the advantages of a single electric camera such as easy to carry are also very competitive, if there are no further professional requirements for photography, a single electric camera is also a good choice Single electric was first launched by Sony, but Nikon as a more professional sign, the advantages of the lens are incomparable to Sony, and in the future, the lens will be upgraded, and Nikon will have more advantages I hope it will help you

It depends on your personal situation, if you're tight on money and you don't want to invest too much money, then buy Sony, if you have a lot of money and want to have fun photography, you can buy Nikon. But I suggest that now Nikon and Canon are the two major mainstream brands of SLR, and Sony has only begun to develop SLR technology in recent years. Its main development is electronic products, so it is slightly inferior to the newly developed Sony compared to Nikon and Canon, the two old SLR brands.

Nikon and Canon are on par, but if you want to talk about the number of lenses, I think Canon has slightly more lenses than Nikon. Nikon is a Japanese brand specializing in SLR. And Canon is also engaged in some other electronic products.

The coverage is a bit larger.

Okay, so let's give a good review. Pure hand-to-hand hitting. It's not easy. I've just just gotten my hands on a DSLR camera

The micro-single has only come out in the past 2 years, Sony and Panasonic are pioneers, and there are more lenses than single digits. Nikon only launched the first J1 last year, and it doesn't have as many lenses as Sony.

So far, Sony's is better, but Nikon, as an old SLR manufacturer, will soon catch up.

Hello, let's choose Nikon.

The micro is that Sony's image quality is good, and there are many lenses, while Nikon's is smaller and lighter.