Is it hopeless to say that the interview will go back and wait for news?

Not necessarily, it depends on the other person you're interviewing with. There will be a trade-off between the interviewing unit and they think you may still be good. However, I also want to see if others are better.

Maybe you're a very good candidate for it, or maybe you're one of the alternatives. Don't wait for news in a hurry.

Yes, there is little hope.

Waiting for the news means that if another person is not coming to work, you may be notified.

Hello. The interviewer can't say it clearly, so it can only be so tactful, but it's not necessarily, it's also possible that people haven't discussed it well, and you still have a chance.

If it is an ordinary position or a large number of people in demand for the same position, it is generally said that it is hopeless to go back and wait for news. However, if it is a more important position or management post, and in the case of a large number of competitors for the same position, it is often necessary for a higher level of leadership to make a decision or retest, and it will also be allowed to go back and wait for news, of course, this situation will not wait too long, because they are also afraid of talent loss, and most of them will give a notice of whether to advance to the next round of interviews or trial positions the next day.

After the interview, let me go back and wait for news, generally speaking, there is no hope. It is also possible that you will be notified to go to work, but there is little hope.

Generally speaking, if you are sure, you will be contacted quickly, and if there is no news for a long time, it is hopeless.

In general, there is no hope, but there are other situations, that is, qualified! If you haven't been notified for two or three days, there's no hope!

No, there is still hope, after the interview, several interviewers need to calculate everyone's score, and they also need to rank the leaderboard, and finally decide.

Not necessarily. He may need to make a comparison within a few days, usually within three days.

Not necessarily! But it's more likely.

Generally speaking, waiting for a notification after an interview does not mean that there is no play. Generally, there are the following situations:

1. The interviewer thinks you are not suitable, but he wants to save some face for you and tell you tactfully, hoping that you can understand. As mentioned above, this is more likely.

2. The interviewer thinks you are very good, but the other interviewers are also good, and he can't choose for a while, so he needs to compare and make a decision. It's not uncommon to hire for senior positions, and if you arbitrarily think there's no hope, you could be missing out.

3. The interviewer has made an appointment with several people to interview for the same position, although he thinks you are not bad, but it has not reached the level where he wants to make a decision immediately, and he wants to see how the next few people are. It's similar to the situation above, he needs to compare and make a decision.

4. It is also possible that the interviewer's level is not high, and he has no right to make a decision, and he has no right to decide whether you go or stay. He needs to give your information to the boss for review, so that the leader can get an idea, and maybe you need to have a second interview.

Of course, this is a relatively high position that is so complicated.

If you're interviewing for a very good organization, don't give up easily. Don't arbitrarily assume that the interviewer is hopeless for you to wait for a notification.

No. In fact, when the interviewer asks you to go home and wait for the notice, it represents the following four possibilities (note: being eliminated is one of the possibilities):

1. You are a spare tire, and the interviewer wants to see other candidates.

It is possible that your performance during the interview did not satisfy the interviewer, and the interviewer will have to go through a round of screening before making a decision. In other words, you're not doing very well, you have to be very good.

2. The company or the boss needs to consider carefully.

If you're applying for a middle or senior management role, the company will be more careful about selecting candidates and will be less likely to respond to you on the spot.

3. It takes time to schedule the next round of interviews.

The interviewer's initial interview is over, but there is something to do, and the second interview may not be arranged quickly because he is too busy with a business trip or a meeting.

4. It was eliminated.

I didn't wait for a reply because the interviewer wasn't very happy with you, and you were eliminated.

Extended Materials. Cope.

If you are very concerned about the results of this interview and can't wait for the results, then you may wish to take the initiative to contact through the existing ** or email address to ask about the interview results. It should be noted that the results of the inquiry are also carefully considered, and inappropriate methods are likely to be self-defeating.

The best time to do this is about a week after the interview, as the interviewer may be looking at multiple candidates during this time. When calling and inquiring, you should be sincere and not humble or arrogant. In fact, the interviewer is also a part-time worker, and there is no need to be afraid, of course, you can't be too eager.

Ask more open-ended questions and less closed-ended questions. "How long is the recruitment period for this position", "I don't know what your impression of me" will be smoother than "is your company ready to hire me", "Can I come to work" will make the communication between you and the interviewer smoother.

Because at that time, it would make the interviewer feel very embarrassed to say the results of the interview, and the interviewer also took care of their emotions and was embarrassed to say it, so he could only say the final result in a subtle way after going back.

The interviewer is not necessarily the final decision-maker, first: they may think that you still have hope, but they still need to report to the top; Second: they need to be admitted on the basis of merit; Third:

In order to give people a "barrier mentality", once in a way to make you cherish this job opportunity.

Because there are a lot of interviewers, not just this one, and HR will interview a lot of people in a certain period of time, pick out the most suitable person and then notify, if he meets a better person after the interview, of course, he will not be admitted again.

Because many candidates need to go back to discuss after the interview, they will not tell the interview results on the spot, but let the interviewee go back and wait for news.

This is because HR also needs to comprehensively consider the interviewee in the follow-up in order to analyze the most appropriate result and decide whether the interviewee will stay or not.

Because there are many people in each interview, it needs to pass further judgment, and the results cannot be released on the same day, so let me go back and wait for news.

It's because all HR judges everyone and selects the best interviewees, so they let the interviewers go back and wait for news.

There are two possibilities for HR not to say the interview results on the spot, one is to refuse politely to avoid unnecessary conflicts; The second is alternative, because there are many candidates for interview, and it is necessary to select the best candidates.

Because they still have to discuss it and then choose, otherwise it will be very embarrassing to say it in person, which is also a very subtle method.

Because HR has to screen and screen out some suitable ones, it cannot decide the specific situation of the interviewer at the moment, and needs to be considered comprehensively in combination with various factors.

Because they still have to choose some interviewers according to some situations, they can also make the interviewees less shocked.

Because it needs to be considered by HR for a period of time, and finally the merit is admitted. And this also avoids embarrassment.

That's because they will conduct further research on the individual's abilities before making a merit-based selection.

After interviewing a company, we can look for the next company, adjust the resume according to the position JD and continue to deliver, maintain about 10 deliveries every day, and the probability of getting an interview opportunity will be greater, maybe there will be a chance to get multiple high-quality offers and enter the anti-selection stage. Whether the company asks you to wait for Tongchang to know, or talks about the salary for you to consider, or firmly says that you have been hired and the approval process is signed, it will arrange for you to join the company, as long as you have not signed the labor contract.

Everything is changeable, so there is no need to wait, what you have to do is to continue to look for a job, continue to interview, and this does not delay you waiting for the notice, do you need to sit on a small bench to wait for the notice, you can't go, sit until you are old?

It is probably the 3rd day after the interview, if you haven't waited for a reply, we can call **, ask the interviewer, it is not recommended to contact the interviewer frequently, but on the 3rd day, politely ask about your interview results, remind the interviewer of your candidate's existence, show your strong intention for the company, you can add a few more points for yourself. The interviewer should have interviewed multiple candidates in succession in these 3 days, and if you have performed well in the interview, then you are more likely to be recommended for the next round of interviews or get this offer by asking online at this time.

The interviewer needs to find another better person, but is a little worried that it will be difficult to find a suitable candidate in the short term, so he is late in order to leave a choice, so he does not directly reject the candidate. In this case, except for a few special circumstances, such as not finding a more suitable person within two or three days, and urgently needing to be in place for the post, the job seeker will be notified to come to work. In most cases, waiting for notice means declining.

So when you hear this result, the best thing to do is not to wait any longer and look for other positions.

No need to wait. The results of the interview are generally available on the second day, which means that the interview has failed.

I don't think I should continue to wait, and under normal circumstances, if I don't respond for two days, I just haven't been selected.

I think you should take the initiative to contact the other company, not to argue with the general large companies, they do it after the interview, and then within seven working days will have the result.