Which is better, plasma TV or LCD TV?

Updated on number 2024-03-03
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Plasma TVs are better!

    Plasma is a display technology that uses inert gas discharge, using a plasma tube as a light-emitting device, each pixel corresponds to a plasma tube, and the plane of the light-emitting plasma tube is evenly distributed in the screen. In this way, the center and edges of the image are exactly the same, and there is no distortion, achieving a pure plane in the true sense of the word.

    Plasma is a self-illuminating display technology that does not require a background light source, so it does not have the viewing angle and brightness uniformity problems of LCD displays, and achieves high brightness and contrast. The design of the three primary colors sharing the same plasma tube also avoids focusing and convergence problems, allowing for very clear images.

    The liquid crystal display in LCD TV is a transmissive display technology, using a transistor electrode made of thin film technology, using a scanning method to actively control the opening and closing of the display point, so as to control the arrangement of liquid crystal molecules, and then change the shading and light transmission state to display the image.

    The liquid crystal display itself does not emit light and needs a backlight, so the brightness depends on the light transmission efficiency of the backlight source and the liquid crystal itself, so it is more difficult for LCD TVs to achieve high brightness and contrast than plasma TVs, and there are also problems with response time and viewing angle, but the recent progress in liquid crystal display technology is quite amazing. At present, there is not much gap between LCD and plasma in terms of brightness and viewing angle,The response time of most LCD TVs on the market has reached13 16ms,12msand8msThere are also many products,It can completely solve the residual image and tailing phenomenon in the dynamic display process。

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Like ** sports programs, action blockbusters or playing games, plasma TV is better, suitable for use in the living room or large room, plasma TV picture is soft and not dazzling, and the display of dynamic pictures is good. The LCD TV shows a good effect on the still picture, and the display of the dynamic picture is not as good as plasma. The power consumption of plasma changes with the change of picture brightness, and the power consumption of LCD TV is constant, the power consumption of the two is about the same, but the life of the LCD screen can reach about 60,000 hours, and the life of the plasma screen is generally about 40,000 hours, and the life of the traditional CRT TV picture tube is about 20,000 hours.

    But longevity is not the main problem, now the development of technology is too fast, and it is time to replace it before the life expectancy is up. The key is to buy according to your own situation, and the one that suits you is the best.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Each has its own advantages, the liquid crystal has no radiation, but the price is high, the plasma picture effect is good, but it costs electricity, and it is not as durable as the liquid crystal! I make home appliances, just my personal opinion!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Plasma TVs are better: (1) Plasma TVs are easier to achieve large screens and super large screens.

    2) Large viewing angle (3) Short response time (4) Use R, G, B three-color phosphor self-luminescence, do not use backlight, good image color effect (5) can achieve full digitalization (6) Plasma TV has the advantages of flat-screen TV (7) Low power consumption.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    42UT30C is recommended, which is more cost-effective. Another: Don't follow the crowd anymore, PDP is nominal of its maximum power, which is determined by its working principle, and when working, it will only be reached when it is completely white; Whereas, the power of the LCD is basically constant.

    Therefore, in actual use, PDP is more power-saving than LCD.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Liquid crystal is good, liquid crystal is liquid imaging, plasma is gas imaging, relatively speaking, the service life of liquid crystal is long, plasma is clear, is gas imaging, relatively speaking, the service life is shorter than liquid crystal,

  7. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The final imaging effect of plasma and LED is almost the same, and they are both high-tech products, but now the real LED price is relatively high. Most of the TVs bought in the store now are LED backlights, which are not real. So plasma is more suitable.

  8. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The effect of plasma and the current hard screen LCD are not like up and down. But the price is very different, and the heat dissipation is not good.

  9. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    LED just changes the backlight of the liquid crystal, it still belongs to the liquid crystal, LED is better than plasma, power saving, ultra-thin, long life, environmental protection and other advantages are stronger than plasma.

  10. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Although plasma is good, it is not cheap, and liquid crystals are not as clear as plasma, so they are cheaper.

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Each has its own merits. Look at the plasma.

    No tailing. Underestimate LCD.

    Drawing paper is good.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    It must be LED, and the light will be from the thickness of the TV. Samsung LED can do it.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Panasonic plasma TVs are better than other TVs!

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    This question is difficult to answer, that is, which is the same as noodles or bread, LCD TV has the characteristics of no flickering image, light and thin appearance, low radiation, high resolution, higher brightness, etc., and LCD screen has been widely used in the PC field, but LCD technology lags behind plasma in terms of large screen, and the cost of large-screen color TV is higher, and it is easy to be affected by the viewing angle.

    Plasma TVs have richer colors, large viewing angles, and short response times. The contrast is higher, the image has a stronger sense of hierarchy, the color reproduction characteristics are good, and the display image color is bright and saturated. Moreover, it is relatively easy to make the screen larger, but its disadvantages are large power consumption, limited life, and easy aging.

    Plasma TV has high dynamic definition, no residual image tailing, obvious advantages in image quality, and high comfort for a long time, suitable for friends who like to watch action blockbusters or sports programs; LCD TV product line is rich,The appearance is more fashionable,The picture clarity is higher,And the radiation is relatively small,There are more additional functions of TV,For example, Internet function、Changhong's music education function can better meet the needs of the family。

Related questions
14 answers2024-03-03

LG 55LH95QD...Samsung's seems to be nothing else

20 answers2024-03-03

It depends on how big you want to buy,Now Hisense Skyworth55Inch4KIt's about 3000,48Inch is cheaper。 >>>More

5 answers2024-03-03

Ask the installer to come not necessarily to install it on the wall, but it can also be to assemble the bottom seat and debug the TV. You don't need to hire an installer if you know it yourself. If you use an old-fashioned analog signal, after the TV is plugged in, use the remote control to press out the menu to automatically search for programs, and wait for the search to end. >>>More

6 answers2024-03-03

There are two points: First, the composition is different. >>>More

4 answers2024-03-03

There is no difference between the panels, they are all LG-philip, the difference is that the molds are different, the interfaces, the design is not the same, the number of lamps inside is different, and the energy saving is not the same. It is recommended that in the current market**, do not buy 32-inch ones, which are not as cost-effective as 40-inch ones. As long as it is not an LED backlight, it is still very cost-effective.