If you can t read logic on the GMAT, do you have the same amount of questions in reading, logic and

Do logic chain training.

The first step is to find the premise and conclusion and find out their core content in the simplest language;

The second step is to analyze what kind of logic is used in the process of deriving the conclusion, and what problems exist in this logical method.

The third step is to use different types of questions to solve these problems.

In view of this process, the training method used is as follows: classify the question types of the OG, take the weakening as an example, the first step, after getting all the weakening questions of the OG, remove all the options of the questions, conduct a separate closed logical chain training, write out the logical links of all the question stems, and analyze the logical ideas.

The second step is to think about the possible direction of the answer to the logical problem found in the first step.

The third step is to put the options back and select them. The fourth step is to summarize the logical chain and logical thinking, and conduct an option analysis. The whole process seems to be very troublesome, but the essence of the whole logic is shown in this process, if your logic wants an essential change, then please be patient to carry out logic chain training.

I don't know how you sc? If you really know all the words, there should be no problem with the vocabulary. Grammar should be an issue.

In addition, reading improves very slowly, and there are many fixed usages that are irregular and need to be accumulated. Reading should be improved if you read 3 hours a day for at least 2 months.

In fact, GMAT is mainly to test the reading level on this basis and then practice logical grammar, reading or read more, GMAT is a very standardized material, do more and read more to familiarize yourself, at first you can't read or time is not enough, it is normal, don't rush to take your time, but keep reading Insist on practicing will improve.

The grammar is 15-18 questions. The GMAT language section has a total of 41 questions that need to be completed in 75 minutes.

GMAT grammar tests the mastery of rigorous written English, which means that the GMAT grammar test is not only a test of the correct use of English language rules, but also a test of whether the candidate can master the strict rules of written English. The GMAT grammar test has different grammar requirements than other English tests.

When reading the text in the logical question, you can't just take the "grasp the backbone" and ignore the modifiers such as "fixed form supplement" in the traditional reading text, in fact, often the adjectives, adverbs and other modifiers in the sentence will play a crucial role in the understanding of the whole topic.

In the logic question trembling, there will be two categories of questions: "induction" and "deduction". In the inductive questions, in addition to the "syllogism" bridge reasoning that candidates are more familiar with, special attention should be paid to the "summary of Li Ma's praise induction", that is, the summary or synonymous expression of the original text, sometimes called "one-sentence reasoning".

GMAT logic is difficult and often causes headaches for test takers. In order to do a good job in logic questions, candidates should first understand the competency requirements of their examination. If you want to know how many types of GMAT logic are, you might as well read on to ......

1.Argument construction questions.

This type of question is designed to allow candidates to identify the basic structure of the discourse, the conclusions drawn correctly, the implicit assumptions, the strong explanatory assumptions, and the similarities of similarly structured arguments.

In other words, the question asks how the candidate determines how a premise or additional information can be used to draw, support or weaken a certain conclusion. Essentially, it tests the candidate's deductive reasoning ability.

2.Argument evaluation questions.

The main purpose of this type of question is to allow candidates to identify the factors, reasoning errors and methods of argumentation that strengthen or weaken established arguments on the basis of analyzing established arguments. In other words, this type of question tests the candidate's ability to reason inductively, allowing the candidate to find support, disadvantages, and assumptions based on the reasoning that already exists in the question stem.

3.Action plan questions.

The main purpose of these questions is to identify the relative applicability, effectiveness or efficiency of different action plans, the factors that strengthen or weaken the success of the proposed action plan, and the assumptions on which the proposed action plan is based.

This kind of question appears less frequently, and it is completely possible to combine them according to the answers to the two questions introduced above, and take different methods to answer them according to different situations.

Logic exercises to get stuck in time.

What you need to do in the GMAT logic preparation is to pay attention to the time to solve the problems in the process of daily practice. Candidates should get used to learning logic under time pressure.

Tension can affect people's logical thinking ability, and when practicing, it is necessary to adapt to the intensive reading and simplification work in the tense environment.

The above is the content of several major question types of GMAT logic, I hope you can understand these question types, gradually improve your logical reasoning ability in the preparation process, and do a good job in GMAT logic questions.

The title states that the story of Prince Sviatov is in 1165, and that Sviatov's father is still alive.

Because his father died in 1167, it is inferred that the book must have been written between 1165 and 1167.

And the answer is quite logical, because notice that the diagram accurately represents the composition of Sviatov's family at the timesviatovin was written, not only that the icons accurately represent the family composition, but that the genealogy of the book was written at the time of writing written, which is important) is accurate. If the book was written after 1167, it would be inaccurate to say that his father was still alive, so there is no question with the answer.

As for your choice, I can see why you want to choose this way, because if the author did not intend to provide the correct information, no matter what year the book was written, even if it was 2014, knowing that a person could not live to be more than a thousand years old, it can be said that the father is still alive. But this is not straightforward and clear without an answer, and requires a certain additional inference, and we are not roundworms in the author's stomach, so there is no way to know what the author's intentions are, so b is not right.

In the future, if there are similar questions, it should also be noted, and all those who say what they think should be considered generally cannot be selected, because it cannot be directly proven. This is a note for logical answering.

Hope it helps, and if you still have questions, please follow up