In real life, is it a waste for an educated woman to be a stay at home wife?

Educated women, if being a full-time wife is really a waste of her knowledge, don't be a full-time wife, you should have a job of your own, even if this job doesn't make much money, but it can also reflect the value of your life.

I don't think it's wasteful, because educated women can take care of their children in a scientific way, accompany their children, make them more comfortable, be a good woman behind their husbands, and let him go out and fight without scruples.

It is indeed a waste for an educated woman to become a stay-at-home wife, because after all, she has a higher education and should make the most of her abilities.

I think it's a waste, because whether it's from the country or a family, it's not easy to cultivate a talent, if you just put this person in the family, it's really a waste of resources, and this woman should have a bigger stage.

Yes, it is really a waste for such a woman to be a full-time wife, and I also think that it is better for women to have their own careers after marriage, so that they also have a certain status in the family.

Whether you want to be a stay-at-home mom or go to work depends on your own ideas, family and career, both of which are important, but the choice is your own ideas.

Of course not, do you think that a mother who graduated from junior high school and a mother who graduated with a doctorate will bring out the same child?

Is it reasonable for a full-time girlfriend to break up and compensate for it If not, a full-time girlfriend is not so "reasonable" and not "reasonable".

When we keep talking about whether we should compensate for a breakup, we ignore a common-sense problem: being a stay-at-home girlfriend doesn't make sense in itself. This means that the relationship has always been premised on the dependence of one party on the other.

This brings up a problem: the quality of the relationship depends on the choice of the dependent party. That is, look at the man.

So the relationship will naturally be unbalanced, and sometimes both people don't feel this imbalance, and think it's normal, but in fact, a good relationship will not always be one party relying on the other, but two independent people supporting together.

Naturally, there will be no problem of breakup compensation, after all, it is very easy and natural for mature people to break up, and they will not think that one person owes another person to make amends.

The key to getting along in balance is in these places:

1. The perception of feelings should be similar.

For example, the two of them should be independent, know what they want, what they can get from the relationship, and have their own future development. Instead of one party falling in love with the other, they always sacrifice themselves to satisfy the other. Two people with similar cognition will have more common words about the world, and they can talk about a lot of things about each other;

2. Fully understand.

Be able to listen to the other person's psychology in a timely manner, sort out the other half's emotions, understand why the other party feels this way, what is behind the emotions, and what has been experienced behind the scenes, etc. Only those who fully understand can empathize with the other half and understand the emotions of the other half;

3. Solve problems in a timely manner.

When there is a quarrel or disagreement, do not delay the problem, but communicate and solve it in time. This kind of solution is not who listens to whom, but that the two can have a consensus, that is, they must find the reasons behind any problem, and then reach a consensus, so that the quarrel will not stay overnight, so that there will be no sense of grievance.

The two who can do this will not care about the gains and losses when they break up, and feel that breaking up is a better choice for their respective futures, and they will not have a sense of indebtedness, or even break up at all.

Many people can't see that behind the relationship between the two people, it is actually the psychological fit of the two people, so many problems can break up, and they can make each other disagree and lack the ability to solve problems.

It is not a waste for an educated woman to become a stay-at-home wife in society, but it is a huge waste of life to become the spouse of someone who holds a discriminatory view.

In the modern world, where a large number of housework is outsourced, women with higher education generally run their families as a career if they work full-time. And in general, it is difficult to be a full-time mother and take care of children when there are more than 3 children. They voluntarily chose the profession and lifestyle of "stay-at-home mothers", rather than being forced to lose their jobs and stay at home without long skills.

Now the wives in the circle of the rich, one is jumping, and the master's and doctoral turtles are grabbing a lot. These wives are not at home as maids and mothers, serving the family. Instead, he conscientiously manages the family wealth and educates the children who are sleepy and all kinds of chicken babies.

All of this requires a considerable level of education and comprehensive quality.

The two most common blocks are children's education and family financial management, and if the platform is high enough, there is also a function of wife group socialization. Each section is a university question, and you can get a doctorate if you are independent. If you want to play with these aspects, there are quite high requirements for the personal qualities of stay-at-home mothers.

So it's hard to say that these stay-at-home moms are wasting their higher education. In many cases, education is not for individual skills, but for the shaping of people's thinking style, executive ability, learning ability and other comprehensive abilities. This is especially true for those who have received overseas liberal arts education.

An open-minded Wang who has the ability to have experience and a broad vision is a mother who educates her children, and I am afraid that the child will already win at the starting line. Everyone is familiar with the story of Meng's mother's three moves, and the height of a mother determines the starting point of the child. So a virtuous wife benefits three generations.

If it is said that there is no need to educate women because they do not participate in social work, those who put forward such ideas are simply short-sighted.

Even if these stay-at-home moms do such an important and valuable job, it is actually a waste of life for a large part of them.

Why? The main reason is that a group of people who have more meat can't see their importance at all, and they don't understand their contributions, so they wipe out their efforts, and then discriminate. Especially when their partners have this attitude.

And this attitude is also easily contagious to children, and the people who benefit the most look down on their mothers the most.

So why do they do such a thankless job?

It's really a mistake to pay a sincere heart, and all your efforts are ignored.

I am a Tsinghua University of Science and Technology man who loves divination, has warmth, attitude, and is an open-eyed player in life.

I've had four-digit people come to me for advice on life's troubles.

Stand on the front line of anti-deception.

Principal Zhang Guimei opposes full-time wives, is it a waste for highly educated women to be full-time wives?

It is possible to pay more attention to children's education to a certain extent, but it is almost impossible to provide a better education or replace the role of teachers. <>

First of all, highly educated women will definitely be able to pay more attention to their children's education to a certain extent, because for these high-paid women, they know that a large part of their success comes from their own learning, and they are also direct beneficiaries of learning to change their destiny, so they tend to emphasize more on the role of knowledge and education when educating the next generation, so in the education of the corresponding next generation, they will definitely spend more time, More experience, more money and resources are invested in the learning and education of the next generation, which is also the current Chinese middle class.

This is an important reason why we attach great importance to our children's education. <>

However, this does not ensure that children are provided with a good education and better teaching, because the whole process of education is a very complex process, especially for basic education, it needs to have a good environment, in order to be able to give children a complete education, if it is out of the ordinary educational environment, and even bring children home directly for so-called quality education.

Then it is likely to backfire, because education is not only a process of learning knowledge, but also an important process of learning how to get along with others and how to get along with ourselves, and in school we can communicate with other people, understand the psychological changes of peers, and at the same time learn a lot of ways to deal with people in school, which is difficult to obtain in family education. <>

For most highly educated women, although their own knowledge is relatively rich, it does not mean that their own teaching skills are also particularly excellent, because mastering knowledge and explaining knowledge are two different things, and it is not possible to say that he has the potential to be a teacher because of a person's knowledge reserve.

I think it's okay, because highly educated women are also more attentive to their children's education, and they can also teach their children before primary school.

I think that Dou Kuan can make up for it more in terms of maternal love, but not necessarily for the whole. Because a high level of education does not mean a very high level of education.

I think it is possible to provide better teaching for children, after all, highly educated women are also more conscious, and they can also teach children a lot of things.

Is it good for a woman to be a stay-at-home wife? Mine: First, it's not good.

Second, it is recommended not to. Third, if the following three conditions are met, you can consider: 1. The family is well-off and has no financial worries 2. The husband and wife have a deep relationship and are in one place 3.

Don't be a stay-at-home wife, why do you say that? Because in today's society, the divorce rate is rising year by year. If a woman is a stay-at-home wife, once she suffers a divorce, she will lose her life**.

Life is going to be in trouble, and it's certainly not reasonable or legal. However, China's current laws do not provide detailed compensation for this. If at this time a woman wants to go to court and sue her husband.

Asking them to compensate themselves financially often leads to an embarrassing situation where they have no basis to rely on.

This is the reality of our current society. The people who live in it will naturally encounter various social division of labor and different choices. And for most women.

Once you get married and have children, you will inevitably face raising children. Take care of household chores. Take care of the specific tasks of the elders.

The existence of this phenomenon has been inherited from history. At the same time, it is also closely related to the identity of the woman's mother. As far as the social division of labor in real society is concerned.

It also has a certain degree of reasonable prudence.

It is necessary to keep pace with the world and adapt to social development. Before the founding of the People's Republic of China, the status of women was very low, and women had the extreme label of "long hair and short knowledge". In fact, it is due to the influence of staying at home, not entering the school, and thinking about the influence of old traditions and old concepts behind closed doors.

After the founding of the People's Republic of China, the old and bitter people turned into serfs and sang, happy for thousands of years. In addition to going to school, the role of women in all spheres of society is very prominent. In some fields and industries, the performance is comparable to that of men.

Nowadays, the status of women in society has long been equal between men and women, and in some respects it is even higher. Therefore, if female friends want to fight for status in society, they must rely on their own strength to contribute to the society in order to have value and social status.

It is necessary to make a contribution and reflect social values. People have left their names, and geese have left their voices. That is to say, if you live in the world, you must leave a good name.

If a woman is a full-time wife at home, she will not only restore "two ears do not listen to the world, and only read the books of sages!" "I only look at myself behind closed doors, and I don't care about the old status quo of social development. Over time, it will eventually be eliminated by society.

It is necessary to integrate into the times and cultivate future generations to contribute. Women in the workplace can not only increase the degree of integration with society and increase the income of the family to a greater or lesser extent, but also invisibly increase the information on life, society, the workplace and children's education, etc., and increase the energy and voice for the education and inheritance of the family's children. The role of mother's love and teaching by word and example is the best example for children to learn.

When your children grow up healthy and happy, your family will thrive.

In the social context of the economy as the carrier, women are full-time wives, I think there are good and bad, because women are not there after being full-time wives, the economy is all dependent on men to give money, if you meet some men, self-centered, you will feel that you are supporting the family, and you will have to travel less if you give women money, and women will feel that this marriage is unsustainable, and there are also good, that is, women should be full-time wives at home and take care of their children wholeheartedly, It is a good thing for the growth and development of children, so it is difficult to achieve unity between these two things.

I think it's bad. Moreover, being a full-time wife is also likely to be divorced from society, and it will also lead to being disliked by the family, and it will also lead to self-branching to put too much time and energy into the family, and lose the value of one's life.

I think it's really not good for a woman to be a full-time wife, especially when you meet those unreasonable in-laws, your full-time job is just lazy in their eyes, and they will be cautious and look down on you.