What is the debate competition

Debate competitions, also known as debate competitions, debate meetings, etc., are generally conducted in the form of multi-person teams, and the form is a competition activity in which both sides participate in the debate on a certain issue, and in essence, it is a related knowledge competition around the debate issue. The debate competition not only tests the thinking ability, reaction ability, expression ability, etc., but also tests the team's cooperation ability and comprehensive ability.

Personnel requirements in the debate tournament:

1. Participants: mainly to express their team's views on relevant debate issues.

2. Moderator: Mainly preside over the debate activities, maintain the order of the debate venue, and ensure that the debate activities are carried out in an orderly manner according to the rules.

4. Notary public: mainly responsible for notarizing the debate competition and the results of the competition, and at the same time providing legally recognized evidence for the debate competition activities and relevant personnel.

First of all, we will force our point of view, emphasize your understanding of the key words of the topic, give a few examples, and then analyze the obvious errors in the language of the opponent's debater, preferably in favor of your point of view, and use the other party's mistakes to support your point of view and refute the other side's point of view.

Stabilizing one's own point of view is the most important thing, and then refute the other party, and the four debates must listen carefully to the whole debate, use the examples used before to discuss the viewpoint, and do not lead to new examples.

Strictly speaking, the role of the third debate is similar to that of the second debate. Mainly grasp the opponent's discourse logic spear shield for a fierce attack. Field.

The preparation of subordinates is very important. For example, a large amount of data is collated and documented. Take your argument as an example, and find many examples of people sending false information. When you ask a question, use it in short language.

Examples, tapping, set of questions:

May I ask the opponent's defense friend, how do you judge the accuracy of the news when you are a national reporter?

Location xx What happened and what kind of panic caused the unrest, and how do you think it should be resolved?

You don't look at the example just now, let's take a look at this example, ** happened ......caused ......How can I solve it?

The opponent of the defense does not have a reasonable explanation to solve such a big drawback, how can you argue that the national journalist is conducive to social stability?

At the same time, the second and third debaters are also responsible for defending against the issues raised by the other side. Guess what the other party will ask, whether it's pretending not to know and saying that it has nothing to do with the debate, to grasp the language problem and refute it, to return to your argument by returning to the fallacy. Of course, the level of difficulty varies a lot.

However, as long as you are well prepared off the field, you will at least have no faults and may make meritorious contributions.

There is generally nothing to talk about in questioning techniques, and generally ask the other party after cutting out a short description or giving an example, how to solve it? Why should it? How is it reasonable, please? That's all.

The main thing is to be in charge of attacking and debating, and actively responding to free debate. Help the four debaters to convey information and summarize the audience. Questions, generally set up by a series of questions, can be prepared in advance.

The basic thing to do in the three debates is to attack.

Source argument and free argument Among them, it is more difficult to attack and defend because the opponent only asks you to answer The way to overcome is to be a little confident when you are on the field, and you will not be embarrassed when you are attacking.

When you are debating freely, you have to think actively, and it is actually very easy to do this, first of all, you must fundamentally believe that your argument is correct, and then find the most objective place, so that the opponent will not be easy to defeat.