Is Cao Cao a good guy? Is Cao Cao a good guy or a bad guy?

The good guys and the bad guys depend on the criteria for dividing them. There are no absolute good people in this world, and there are no absolute bad people. Cao Cao was a military strategist, a writer, and also made a certain contribution to the development of society, in this sense, he was a good person.

There are no completely good people in history, and there are no completely bad people, it depends on whether his actions are more beneficial than disadvantages or disadvantages greater than advantages, Cao Cao is a contradictory figure, he can be said to be a talented person in the military, he has political acumen and leadership ability, but sometimes his methods of doing things are a little extreme, it can be said that he is a hero in troubled times.

No, if you are a good person, you will not be able to survive in troubled times, let alone make a difference. Just as a philosopher once said: Noble strategies cannot help the lord win the world.

Cao Cao is a traitor and a hero. But not the good guys.

Not a good person, but definitely a hero.

Both good and bad. It depends on which angle you stand and consider. From the perspective of the famous politicians, military strategists, writers, calligraphers, and founders of the Cao Wei regime in the Three Kingdoms in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, I think Cao Cao is a good person, but not an absolutely good person.

I read it from my sister's history book in the first year of junior high school, I don't know if it's right or not.

Not a good person, but not a bad person. Everyone's thinking is different. It's just a matter of what you think.

It's not good to evaluate, he was a good person from the perspective of the common people in the north and the people who were attached to him at that time, and from the perspective of the people under the rule of Wu and Shu, he was not a good person.

He was an excellent politician, but also an excellent military strategist and writer.

As for whether he is a good person or not, it is difficult to say.

Personally, I adore him very much. So it's a good guy. Can it be so?

The winner is the king and the loser is the thief, whether it is good or not, it is difficult to say, everyone's opinion is different, but my opinion is that compared with other people in his contemporary, history records that the vast majority of Cao Cao's troops and people can eat food, and the vast majority of Yuan Shao's army and people in the same period are cannibalism, and Yuan Shu's army and people eat river mussels and people. Just like Cao Cao himself said:"If it weren't for me, Cao Cao wouldn't know how many people would be emperors and how many people would be kings.

Therefore, Cao Cao played a great role in unifying the north and stabilizing the country and people.

There are positive and negative evaluations of this troubled hero. He **, but he also made a great contribution to the unification of the world.

Yes, the Cao Cao we know now was scandalized by the Romance of the Three Kingdoms!

He developed agriculture in the north and eventually unified the country, so that the people avoided the suffering of war and lived a relatively stable life. At the same time, he killed a lot of people who shouldn't have died, which is more **.

Either Caesar or nothing! It's not good or bad, the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is too distorted!

The evaluation of Cao Cao cannot be a good person or a bad person, but depends on his contribution to history.

There are no absolute good people in the world, and there are no absolute bad people.

There is no good or bad, it depends on whose position you stand on.

There is no such thing as absolute good or absolute bad politicians.

I don't think there's anything good or bad, it's just a matter of which angle to look at him.

The benevolent see the benevolent, and the wise see the wise. Leave the merits and demerits to future generations to evaluate.

When analyzing a character, it should not be too one-sided, but should combine the historical background of the time and understand the great achievements of the protagonist from various channels. Don't just talk about heroes.

It can only be said that he is a hero.

There is no clear distinction between good and bad.

Is Zhuge Liang a good person, a question of nature, it doesn't matter if it's good or bad, it just depends on whether you like it or not.

Good. Regarding Cao Cao, there are biographies of him in historical books such as "Book of the Later Han Dynasty" and "Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms". He was a smart, witty, talented man who did many great things in his life.

However, due to the wide circulation of "Romance of the Three Kingdoms" among the people, people regard Cao Cao in ** as Cao Cao in history, and when Cao Cao is mentioned, they think he is a treacherous, cunning and insidious character. This is very undeserved. I think that whether it is to study the history of the Three Kingdoms, or "Romance of the Three Kingdoms", we should first distinguish Cao Cao in history from Cao Cao on the drama stage, and return the original face of Cao Cao in history.

Historical figures, especially political figures, cannot be evaluated simply by using good people and bad people, but can only be analyzed from the perspective of promoting social progress. A series of measures implemented by Cao Cao obviously stabilized the society at that time and promoted social stability and development to a certain extent. Of course, Cao Cao is indeed a ruthless hero, but political struggles are often like this, and in this era of great turmoil, only the hardliners can hope to survive.

Cao Cao is a man who drives history, not a good guy or a bad guy. Just a historical figure.

Cao Cao is a powerful person, a generation of heroes, but from the fact that he killed Lu Bohao's family, there is really no way to think that he is a good person.

The perspective of the station is different, the recognition of good and bad is different, Cao Cao brought the Son of Heaven, but he made an indestructible contribution to the development of society.

contributions, from the point of view of development, are good people.

Not a good guy, but he's ruthless.

Cao Cao, an outstanding politician, military strategist, writer, calligrapher in the late Eastern Han Dynasty, and the founder of the Cao Wei regime in the Three Kingdoms.

At the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the world was in turmoil, Cao Cao conquered the Quartet in the name of the Son of Emperor of the Han Dynasty, eliminated the separatist forces such as Eryuan, Lü Bu, Liu Biao, and Han Sui internally, and subdued the Southern Xiongnu, Wuhuan, Xianbei, etc., unified northern China, and implemented a series of policies to restore economic production and social order, laying the foundation for Cao Wei's state.

Cao Cao was fine with the art of war, good at poetry, expressed his political ambitions, and reflected the suffering life of the people in the late Han Dynasty, with majestic spirit, generosity and sadness; The prose is also clear and tidy, which opened and prospered Jian'an literature, leaving a valuable spiritual wealth to future generations, known as Jian'an style and bones. At the same time, Cao Cao is also good at calligraphy, especially Gong Zhangcao, and Zhang Huaijun of the Tang Dynasty rated it as a "wonderful product" in "Book Break".

Summary. This is a view of the benevolent and the wise. People who like Shu will think that Cao Cao is not good, and people who like eloquence will think that Cao Cao is a person who has left a name in history.

Hello, I read the question you sent, it takes some time to type and reply, please wait.

Cao Cao was a statesman, military strategist, and writer during the Three Kingdoms period. It is impossible to define whether he is a good person or a bad person in history, and Cao Cao is also a hero.

This is a view of the benevolent and the wise. People who like Shu will think that Cao Cao is not good, and people who like eloquence will think that Cao Cao is a person who has left a name in history.