Canon IXUS 870 IS or Panasonic FX180 Which is better?

It is very suitable for friends who pursue simple operation, and shoot with one click.

FX38] is a notch lower than [FX180], which belongs to the previous generation of products, but it is just as good.

The key depends on what your budget is. Money is enough to buy 180, not enough to buy 38.

FX38] Adopt Panasonic Vilas [3rd generation] image processing system FX180] Adopt Panasonic Vilas [4th generation] image processing system It is recommended to take a look at the new [IXUS 110], which can be said to be an upgraded version.

If the landlord has a demand for [manual function], it is good to buy FX180.

In pursuit of simplicity] buy the IXUS series cameras.

The 870 and 110 are powered by Canon's latest [4th generation] image processing system.

Note: All Panasonic cameras, as well as Canon IXUS series cameras, are made in Japan.

It is recommended to go to the following** to see what others have taken with these 2 cameras**.

I also asked this question a few days ago, hehe, and I hesitated for a long time.

The brand is still a little older than Canon, and customers who use Canon say that it is good, and over time, Canon's reputation spread.

But Canon is good, and you can't go wrong with Canon

Panasonic is also good, the cost performance is also good, [cheaper than Canon] are all 2000rmb machines, cameras.

For home use, the gap between the shooting is not very large, but Canon's [shooting people] is very good, this Panasonic ratio.

If you don't buy a camera, go to a specialty store to try the camera, and you still choose what you like.

Yes, Nikon, it's not interesting.

The manual gear of 180 is not interesting, if you really like manual, there is cloth like the bulkiness of the SLR, LX3 is a good one.

Choose I'm also bullish on this one.

Dead Pixel Test Software for Testing Camera Dead Pixels Pretty Good May be useful o( o

Personally, I feel that 870 is better, with a 28mm wide angle, and the reputation is also good, in fact, it is useless to manually or not, depending on what your needs are? The average user 870 is enough.,If the demand is high, buy a SLR.,I hope you can be satisfied with my answer.。。。

Canon's is better I recommend you buy a Canon machine.

Camera, how can Panasonic compare with Canon!

Those who buy Canon generally fancy the soft color, those who buy Nikon generally fancy the sharp color, those who buy Binder generally fancy the noble background, those who buy Olympus generally fancy the appearance, those who buy Ricoh generally fancy the old optics, those who buy Laika are generally very rich, those who buy Fujifilm are generally blind to the parameters, those who buy Sony are generally fooled by advertising, those who buy Panasonic are generally ignorant, those who buy Casio are generally extremely ignorant, and those who buy Patriot are generally pro-domestic products. Those who buy BenQ are generally in the brain.

Enlarge the details, choose Fujifilm F100

There are several cameras on the forum to compare, and only the F100 is the clearest.

In terms of picture quality, performance, and function, there is not much difference, Panasonic's FX180 has better workmanship, and the after-sales service is more convenient, so it is more cost-effective!

It is recommended that you buy the top-of-the-line DC Panasonic LX3 directly

You are so demanding. Anyway, it's not a lot of money

The Panasonic FX180 is really good, I haven't used other models.

Fujifilm F100FD best choice, 12 million pixel SuperCCD, image stabilization, macro.

The best color, guaranteed that you will not regret buying it!

Ha ha! I'm also a student of visual communication at the Academy of Fine Arts, and I lied to you as a puppy. I'm a junior in Hubei University.

I was also hesitant at this time last year. It's much clearer now.

Learn visual communication! Tell you, in the future, this major and photography are very closely related, if you don't understand photography, advertising design you can't go, really.

It is recommended that you go directly to the SLR, you don't go on it today, and you will know how much you regret it when you need it in the future, really. I bought a card machine last year, but it didn't work anymore, and I still have to buy a single-lens reflex, so I suggest you consider it.

At present, the most suitable SLR for you is the Canon 450D single-head set machine, which is about 4500 yuan, and the Nikon D80 set of 6000 yuan is also very cost-effective.

If you don't have enough budget funds, it is recommended that you buy a good one with a full manual, and you can also play the card machine and then play the SLR. More than 2000 around the recommended Nikon P5100Panasonic FZ28There is also the Fujifilm S8100

If you have a more budget, you can use the Canon G10Panasonic LX3Nikon P6000

Trust me, that's right.

FX180 noise is generally not reflected, and Panasonic FX520 is also recommended

The card machine is definitely Canon's best, how about the 980is? It may be more useful for you, because you have to learn the basics of photography, there is basically no need to have a wide angle, and the 870is is indeed the most balanced model on the opposite side now, but I personally feel that maybe the 980is is more suitable for you.

Nikon S60 is also recommended, effective pixels: 10 million Image sensor size: 1 inch Optical zoom: 5x Macro shooting distance as close as 9cm inch touchscreen widescreen LCD

The four cameras you have chosen are really discerning, each with a wide-angle function, and they are all the best cameras in this one.

It's just that the comparison here is that the Panasonic camera uses a Leica lens, and the image quality is very good. However, if you want to shoot in low-light conditions, it depends on the amount of light entering the wide aperture. These are basically the aperture of yours.

Therefore, it is impossible to expect these cameras to achieve good night shooting results. Only the Panasonic LX3 is the most suitable:

11.3 million pixels, double light change, 24-60mm focal length, aperture. Not to mention the noble pedigree of his Leica lenses, just talking about the large aperture can be proud. This camera usually shoots people, landscapes, and especially large scenes, which is very handy.

If you want to shoot things macro, the image quality is also top-notch. In particular, the amount of light entering the large aperture is several times that of the day, and you can't go wrong when shooting night scenes. You may also be worried about what to do with the telephoto end, which is very simple, add a multiplier lens to reach 210mm telephoto, not to mention that the telephoto end is not used much.

Suffice it to say, if you buy the cameras you choose, you will definitely regret it when you shoot night scenes. Only this one dares to be comparable to the SLR. **More expensive, about 3,000 yuan, only a few hundred yuan more than 2,56, but it's worth the money.

Among these 4 films, I will choose F100D, I see that you are studying art, and you should have high requirements for image quality and color, among these 4 parts, F100 has the best noise control, the best color, 28mm, wide angle and 5x optics, can meet the general requirements, F100, among these 4, the CCD area is the largest.

Panasonic image quality is also good,Is noise control good,As long as it's not a high ISO,The general camera is about the same,As a general play,Don't care about the jargon that experts say,You can't buy anything at the mercy of others。

Like is the last word.

Whether Panasonic noise control is good or not, you can use it.

I am a seller and professional repairer of digital cameras, I recommend buying a Canon ixus870is digital camera, the image sensor of Canon digital camera is quite stable, and the color reproduction is excellent, and the performance of the whole machine is also very good. Better value for money.

Canon is a professional manufacturer of cameras and digital cameras, and is the world's leading manufacturer of digital cameras. Every detail of the digital camera has been done in a way that no other manufacturer can match. (To be clear, I'm not Canon's to; It is just an answer based on more than 20 years of experience in camera use and maintenance and nearly 8 years of accumulation of digital technology. ）

Hello, Canon is the first choice in terms of function and quality, and Canon is the leader in the camera industry, leading in technology and sales.

The picture quality is good. It's just that manual work can indeed make a more exciting**.

The situation of lz is similar to that of me half a month ago, and in the end I chose the FX180 ** to buy it confirmed that it was a licensed product with a ticket only 1900 should use a fake invoice but it does not affect the warranty )

MS landlords are most concerned about F100FD and FX180 These two models have nothing to say about the quality of these two models

Needless to say, the FX180 I'm using now is made in Japan

I also tried the F100FD when I bought the camera

Advantages: I believe that the landlord knows more than I know, so I'll talk about the feelings and disadvantages after using it myself

Although the F100FD is only a trial, it is still a little touching

In dim light, there really isn't much irritability, the SuperCCD is really not covered (due to the auto mode, the light is dark, and the sensitivity is automatically turned up).

The lens distortion is not as terrible as I think it is, and it's not as it says on the Internet (maybe because I didn't use a computer to watch it).

Disadvantages: 1. The backlight will indeed have obvious purple edges, which is really obvious

2. No manual, it's really not too good... I can only record life, and there is no fun of photography...

FX180 I've been using it for more than half a month, and I've pinched nearly 500 ** (indiscriminately shot.。。 ）

It's as good as it was above

It's not very obvious when it's ISO400 (Of course, there's still a gap with superccd.。。。

Disadvantages: 1. The manual function is incomplete, only M and P files, no A and S files, and the aperture only has a maximum and minimum 2 stops. (But it's mainly with M gear, and the other 3 gears won't use a lot, and it's not me, and I'm not very professional, hehe).

2. The aperture is purely circular, and the stars cannot be illuminated (this is more depressing, and the playability has dropped by one section.)

3. Sometimes the focus will be slower I don't know if it's a problem with my technology or what. Anyway, sometimes it happens ...

I haven't used a few other models but I've seen a lot of reviews, and there's really no comparison with these two

That's all for the feeling, and then it's up to LZ to choose by yourself If you look at the imaging, you don't have to say that the 2 models are just that Fuji's purple edge will affect the mood. At present, there is still a big gap, I see that I like it

F100FD night view is good, the other two have not been used, I don't know. Can't say. Like the landlord, I originally wanted to buy the LX2 (the LX3 is too expensive), but the LX2 has been discontinued and I am afraid that I will buy a refurbished one.

Finally bought the F100FD. It's not intuitive to say anything. You can go to my QQ space to see the night scenes and scenery I photographed**.

Not at all PS. There are ** in Suzhou Mudu Ancient Town with colleagues, the night view of the Oriental Pearl taken on the Bund and the night view of the Songhua River taken in Jilin City. My F100FD is a port water that I bought with 1530 on ** two months ago.

I don't need to say the ** of my space).

In contrast, the recommended landlord FX180, stylish appearance, excellent imaging, rich functions Panasonic FX1** series of cameras, the quality is very good.

It is recommended to buy licensed goods, enjoy the national warranty, and buy a digital product, not also to buy a solid FX1** series camera, which is made in Japan.

Excluding Canon's landlord, I suggest you want to *** choose Panasonic.

The night view of the FX180 is indeed very good, and the effect of starlight is incomparable to other machines, not to mention that the FX100 was a quite successful product back then. Also in the sunny day, the FX180 effect is better than the F100FD, not to smash 180 on the few money, I have played with both machines for a long time, and I have experienced it myself.

In terms of grade, it is indeed better than Panasonic FX180.

Because the CX180's CCD is 1 inch, which is larger than the Canon's 1.

The image sensor CCD is an important factor in determining image quality.

What's more, Panasonic FX180 with RAW format. The RAW format is 30 percent better than regular RGB.

The quality is good for Panasonic 180.

It doesn't matter if you buy water or not. Same. Panasonic cameras are all imported from Japan, and there is no domestic production base.

The Canon 870 is the best, and the DC only considers the Canon.

If you're shooting night scenes, don't choose Canon.

Have you ever seen Nikon, its card machine is good!

Of the three you said, in terms of synthesis, it's still Panasonic!

The quality of parallel goods is good, as long as it is not very watery, you can understand!

Even if it is said to be original, it can be a lie.

Finally, test runs are important!

If you're going to buy a Ricoh R8, you're going to die!

Everything else is better than Ricoh's!

If you don't have any money, you still have to buy a second-hand phone!

These three machines are still 110. First of all, it's definitely right to choose a wide-angle machine, as for high pixels, it's useless. 870 and 110, the former has a larger screen, and the latter has a better appearance.

There is no full manual card machine like this, there are very few semi-manual, basically it is fully automatic, at most there is an M file, and the adjustment is only some ** attached parameters. So you don't have to worry that you won't use.