Canon IXUS 80 and Canon 860 Canon 85 and Sony T700 that is good

T700 is cool enough and stylish enough.

But. Comparison of the T-series and the IXUS series.

The advantages of the Sony T series are that the body can be made very thin, the function and shape are very stylish, the sense of high-tech is very strong, and the large touch screen.

The disadvantage is that the imaging effect is not good, this is determined by the periscope lens it uses, this lens is small, the light intake is small, although it can minimize the thickness of the fuselage, but the lens quality is very bad, so the imaging effect is very poor.

The Canon IXUS series all use telescopic lenses, with large lens aperture, relatively high lens quality, and large amount of light, so in the case of the same or similar CCD size, the imaging performance of the camera is much better, and the certainty is that the volume of the camera, especially the thickness, is relatively large.

In terms of imaging performance, none of the T series is as good as any of the IXUS series, and this is determined by the lenses used in each one.

In short, in pursuit of form and fashion, you can choose the T series (almost the only advantage), and the pursuit of performance, choose the Ixus series (in fact, it is also very stylish).

Here's a question for you: Do you think you can't make a periscope camera with Canon's technical prowess? - Canon doesn't have a camera with this kind of lens.

For 80 and 860

The IXUS 860 has two advantages over the 80.

One is a 3-inch large screen and the other is a 28mm wide angle.

I'm just saying it's an advantage, but not an advantage.

For the screen, because it's the same as the 80, it's 230,000 pixels, and the screen is big enough, but it's not small enough and it's more power-hungry, and it's not much bigger, no matter how big it is, it's not as big as a computer monitor, and it's on a camera or a computer to see photos?

For the wide angle would have been a good selling point, but the 860 has quite a lot of wide-angle distortion that exceeds the average by 2% to reach more than 4%.

Wide-angle distortion refers to the fact that the subject is stretched in the frame, appearing flat and losing its three-dimensional effect, especially at the edges of the photo.

As a result, these two advantages are actually greatly discounted.

Other performance is pretty much the same Why not choose the cheaper 80?

Comparison of 80 and 85.

Comparison of the Ixus 80 85 90.

The imaging hardware of the 85 is better than that of the 80, and the 1 is as large as the 90 is larger than the 1 of the 80.

The quality of the lens is the highest in 80, 85, 90.

Model Zoom Factor Distortion at the Wide-Angle End Distortion at the Telephoto End.

Canon Ixus 85 is 3

ixus 90 is 3

Canon Ixus 80 is 3

2% is average, and less than 2% is not significantly distorted.

The 85 uses a new battery that has a better battery life than the 80 90.

It can be seen that the 85 is very good value for money.

It is recommended to choose 85

Functionally speaking, 860 is powerful, and recently 860's upgraded product 870 was launched, and 860** directly became below 2200. **Also more cost-effective. It's 8 million pixels, which doesn't seem to be enough in this era of digital cameras with tens of millions of pixels, but it doesn't feel like it's really used when it's used.

Personally, I feel that the biggest drawback is that it looks chubby and a little clumsy. It is said that 870 is better in this regard, but 870 is expensive, and the function is not particularly improved.

T700 looks good, girls like it. It's that all of Sony's cameras shoot bright colors, depending on personal preference. Of course, ** is also about 400 more expensive than 860.

85 is the cheapest, but the performance is not as good as the 860, and the appearance is not as good as the T700.

I recommend the Sony W170 to you! This will be more suitable, ** also more satisfied, cost-effective!

Buy 870 now.

Fully functional. With wide-angle camera function.

There is also a 5x optical zoom.

The screen feels good,**Much better than 990,

I recommend the Sony W170 to you! This will be more suitable, ** also more satisfied, cost-effective!

I believe Canon's Buy 870 now.

Personal advice and opinions for your reference:

The Sony T700 is a card player with a periscope lens, and the imaging effect is slightly lower than that of the Canon IXUS990is card player with a telescopic lead lens.

Sony T700, Canon IXUS990is is a fully automatic camera, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be pre-staged in the camera to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environment, in poor light conditions, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be ideal, but the general home is completely competent.

Focus on the appearance, Sony T700 is more compact and stylish. (On the Sony T700, the 16:9-inch touch screen of 920,000 pixels, which is the biggest buying point, is only the difference between being eye-catching and not when looking back at the photos taken, and has no effect on the actual imaging effect, and the large display will consume more limited power.)

From an imaging point of view, the Sony T700, like all Sony T-series cameras, is not ideal.

Sony T700, Canon IXUS990is at this price, you might as well pay attention to Sony W300, Canon IXUS980IS, better performance, worthy of Sony W series, Canon IXUS series in the Qiqing fiber good ship model, ** around 2300 yuan, the main advantage is that the size of the sensor chip CCD is relatively large, about 1 inch, (Sony T700, Canon IXUS990is is only 1 inch), The large-size sensor chip with more than 10 million high pixels, can really bring higher quality imaging effects, in addition to a variety of pre-shooting modes in the machine, it also has a comprehensive manual shooting function, you can integrate more into the effect you want when shooting, the fun and space of shooting will be greater, especially when shooting pure night photos, after manually adjusting **, aperture, ISO and other parameters, the resulting photo picture effect is clear and clean without any noise, is Sony T700, The Canon ixus 990is can't compare the imaging results captured with so-called program mode (commonly known as point-and-shoot mode) cameras such as Night mode.

Canon A590IS, A650IS, A720IS, ** around 1300-2000 yuan, the performance is also better, the main advantage is that it is the same as Sony W300, Canon IXUS980IS, with a comprehensive manual shooting function.

Among them, the Canon A650is is better, the main advantage is that the CCD size of the sensor chip is relatively large, which is 1 inch, and the large size of the sensor chip with a high image number of about 1200 million or more, can really bring higher quality imaging results.

Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, the one that suits you is the best, you can envy according to your own price, like, check the information on the Internet and compare the various models.