SONY W300 AND CANON IXUS970 IS WHICH ONE IS GOOD?

Digital zoom Is the bigger the number, the better?

No, digital zoom is proportional magnification at the expense of image quality. Personally, I don't think it makes sense.

Optical zoom Is it better to have a bigger number?

Let's talk about the focal length of the lens first

Lens focal length is one of the most important characteristics of a camera lens, and in order to make it easy for traditional photographers to understand the meaning of the lens focal length of a consumer digital camera, we often convert it to the equivalent focal length of a 135 camera.

Lens focal length refers to the distance between the focal points of parallel light rays passing through the lens and the lens.

Basically, if the position of the subject is the same, the focal length of the lens is proportional to the magnification of the object. That is: magnification, image size, subject size.

Optical zoom, such as the Nikon Coolpix 990 digital camera, has a lens focal length of 38 mm - 115mm (equivalent to a 135 camera), we say that it is a 3x optical zoom, which means that the original lens focal length is 38 mm, and the lens focal length can be adjusted to a maximum of 115mm after the lens system is retracted. At the same shooting distance, the subject can be magnified up to three times.

The optical zoom is large, so you can clearly shoot things farther away.

Aperture size How to look good or bad? And that is good?

The larger the aperture, the more light passes through the unit time, and vice versa. The aperture is generally expressed as the letter "f+value", e.g. and so on. It should be noted here that the smaller the number, the larger the aperture, for example, f4 is larger than the aperture, and the difference between the two adjacent aperture values is twofold, that is, f4 is twice as large as the light passing through.

The definition of the shutter is relatively simple, that is, the time that light is allowed to pass through the aperture, which is expressed as a numerical value, such as 1 30 seconds, 1 60 seconds, etc., and the difference between two adjacent shutters is also doubled.

Obviously better.

Another question: The Sony W300 and Canon IXUS 970 IS cameras are about the same price now, but I don't know which one is better, and I am looking forward to it

Nowadays, every camera has its own selling point and characteristics, and Sony's selling point is the appearance. Canon's Camera Imaging***!

A $2000 camera doesn't know what kind of you want.

If you like telephoto, I personally recommend Fujifilm 2000HD

If you like the appearance of SONYT77

If you support domestic products, buy Patriot.

ixus970 is absolutely good.

Take a look at the Panasonic tz15The cost performance is definitely better than your 2 models.

Happy New Year!

As far as photoreceptors are concerned, the 970is has the upper hand:

The 970IS is a 10-megapixel 1-inch CCD;

The W350 is a 14-megapixel 1-inch CCD.

The pixel density of the W350 is too high, which is not a good thing for the already small sensor of the card machine. Under the same conditions, the probability of overexposure or underexposure of W350 is higher than that of 970IS. Many small cameras improve the pixel is just a "selling point" for manufacturers to attract consumption, and real photography enthusiasts often do not buy pixel accounts, but think that the pixel density of CCD is more important.

This is followed by the lenses, and this time it is the W350 that prevails:

The 970is maximum aperture is;

W350 is;

In other words, the shutter speed of the W350 camera will be higher in a darker environment, which is helpful for handheld shooting and the success rate of shooting.

In terms of focal length: 970is is 37-185mm;

W350 is 26-105mm;

The 970is is telephoto-oriented, while the W350 is wide-angle.

Finally, looking at the stabilization, the two machines are similar, both are optical image stabilization, and almost all of them can raise the safety shutter by one notch.

So I think,The comprehensive quality of these two machines is about the same,Which one to choose is to see whether the subject's needs are more wide-angle or telephoto,The second is to see the subject's preference for appearance。

Hope my analysis is helpful to the subject!

I recommend the Sony W170 to you! This will be more suitable, ** also more satisfied, cost-effective!

Buy 870 now.

Fully functional. With wide-angle camera function.

There is also a 5x optical zoom.

The screen feels good,**Much better than 990,

The 860 is better and supports a wide angle of 8 million pixels is enough I'm using it I'm very satisfied with the screen and the other two.

I recommend the Sony W170 to you! This will be more suitable, ** also more satisfied, cost-effective!

I believe Canon's Buy 870 now.

Canon ixus

990is LCD screen is not as good as Sony's previous calendar,Xiang Hui Tan rotten wide son is not good-looking,If you look at it from a practical point of view,Regardless of the actual imaging quality of the photographic pixels,It's Canon good,In addition, the camera is also Canon's parameters are higher。

In terms of cost performance alone, these two models, Canon is slightly better.

Personal advice and opinions for your reference:

Sony T700, Canon IXUS990IS models, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is the same, all 1 inch, there is no major substantive difference in the actual imaging effect, the base imitation mountain rough is a different type, the same grade model.

The Canon IXUS 990is is a card player with a telescopic lens, which has slightly better imaging results than the Sony T700 card player with a periscope lens.

Sony T700, Canon IXUS990is are basically fully automatic cameras, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be pre-staged in the camera to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, in poor light conditions, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be very ideal, but the general home can be fully competent.

The newly launched Canon IXUS990IS and Canon IXUS old models, the most important imaging device sensor chip CCD size is almost the same, are about 1 inch, although some have millions of pixels to improve, the actual imaging effect does not have any major substantive differences, basically the same type, the same grade model, is a new bottle of old wine, without any outstanding functions, only more fancy functions that have no impact on the improvement of imaging effect, because it has just been launched, ** is high, and the current cost performance is low.

In terms of focusing on imaging effects, the Canon IXUS990IS is better than the Sony T700, focusing on appearance, and the Sony T700 is more compact and stylish.

Sony T700, Canon IXUS990IS At this price, you may wish to pay attention to Canon IXUS980IS, Sony W300, better performance, worthy of being the flagship model of Canon IXUS series and Sony W series, the main advantage is that the backup sensor chip is relatively large, 1 inch, (Sony T700, Canon IXUS990IS is only about 1 inch).

The large-size photosensitive chip with more than 10 million high resolutions, can really bring higher quality imaging effects, in addition to a variety of pre-shot modes in the machine, it also has a comprehensive manual shooting function, you can integrate more into the effect you want when shooting, the fun and space of shooting will be greater, especially when shooting pure night photos, after manually adjusting the **, aperture, ISO and other parameters, the resulting photo picture effect is clear and clean without any noise, is Sony T700, The Canon ixus 990is can't compare the imaging results captured with so-called program mode (commonly known as point-and-shoot mode) cameras such as Night mode.

Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, what suits you is the best, you can compare them according to your own price and preferences, and check the information on the Internet.