Remember whether the development of science in a debate competition is good or bad 400 words

Updated on technology 2024-03-09
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Which side do you want?

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I think the development of science and technology is a big benefit. Because the development of science and technology will make our life more convenient and faster. Let's talk about the most common example around us, the camera, which allows us to see our relatives who are far away anytime and anywhere.

    In addition, many of the fruits we usually eat are also transported from various places through the Silk Road, which used to be just horseback riding, which was very physically demanding, but now the plane is much faster. Some people will say that the exhaust fumes emitted by cars are a great threat to human beings, the earth, and resources, but if our scientists can invent things that are beneficial to human beings, why can't they invent things that can stop air pollution? Trust them!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Think for yourself, rely on yourself

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I think that the development of science and technology is very good.

    Nowadays, the development of science and technology is immediate, and it is changing with each passing day. What we want to do, today, with the help of technology, can almost be achieved. However, the pros and cons of scientific and technological development are directly proportional, and if the advantages are great, the disadvantages will be great.

    So, put the pros and cons on both sides of the scale, and who will come out on top?

    Cars, trains, ships, airplanes, spaceships, all kinds of modern means of transportation; Air conditioners, televisions, refrigerators, washing machines, printers, computers, colorful household and office appliances; Elevators, electronic screens, etc

    Special effects lighting, and ...... of the utensils in public placesThese items that bring us countless conveniences are the products of scientific and technological development. With the advent of these high-tech products, a series of environmental pollution problems have also followed.

    And so on. But imagine what your life would be like without these items that come to you every day. Without television, your life will be boring; If there are no ships, planes, your life.

    The pace will become unusually slow; Without a computer, your life would be useless.

    When we talk about the disadvantages of scientific and technological development, we mainly refer to the problem of environmental pollution. But the problem of environmental pollution through science and technology.

    Further development, has been further improved. Through the further development of technology, we can use more clean energy to improve our lives. Through the further development of technology, we can also achieve 2010

    The theme of the Shanghai World Expo: "Better City, Better Life".

    If the pace of technological development stagnates, if all the crystallization of human wisdom disappears without a trace, our lives will become meaningless. Isn't it?

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It's shameless, it's so well written.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    There are two sides to everything, and science is the same, so you can start from this aspect.

Related questions
7 answers2024-03-09

Floating Needle Think: Why do needles float on the water? >>>More

6 answers2024-03-09

It's better to write the problem in detail...

5 answers2024-03-09

Debate: Good intentions must be rewarded;

First of all, I don't really appreciate this debate, the concept of good intentions, good retribution is empty, and there is no obvious opposition and inevitability. For example, marrying Fan Bingbing as his wife, some people think this kind of thing is a good thing, some people think it is a bad thing, whether "retribution" is a "good retribution" is too subjective, a bit like "the emperor hates eating meat, so he punishes the prisoner to eat meat". But on the basis of acknowledging the debate: >>>More

5 answers2024-03-09

First, it is difficult to argue, and it is difficult to summarize the attack. This requires you to use a 12-point spirit to listen to the opponent's loopholes, and to be sarcastic, ridiculed, and sarcastic in the offensive and defensive links, which requires a certain amount of flexibility. >>>More