What are the skills and methods of the opposing side of the debate competition?

First, it is difficult to argue, and it is difficult to summarize the attack. This requires you to use a 12-point spirit to listen to the opponent's loopholes, and to be sarcastic, ridiculed, and sarcastic in the offensive and defensive links, which requires a certain amount of flexibility.

It's easy to say, because a debate can be finalized in advance to set a tone. But it is also very important, because a debate draft is a backbone, and the following content of 2 3 4 parts should be centered around a debate draft. Therefore, the intention must be profound.

A debate should be made by the wisdom of many people.

I don't often think about it so much, after all, it is impossible to give you so much time to think about it on the field, as long as you think about your own problems and then think about the loopholes of the opponent's debater, and attack the shield of the son with the spear of the son.

Illustration full of momentum; Seize the loopholes in the other party's point of view and refute them.

1. Borrowing strength, there is a trick in martial arts, called "borrowing strength", which means that people with deep internal strength can use the power of the opponent's attack to counterattack the opponent's troubles This method can also be applied to the debate.

2. Grafting, eliminating the flawed parts of the opponent's arguments, and replacing them with favorable views or materials on our side, can often receive the miraculous effect of "four or two dialing a thousand catties" This technique is called "grafting".

3. Push the boat down the river, agree with the other party's point of view, deduce according to the logic of the other party, and set up some obstacles that are in line with the situation and reason according to our needs in the derivation, so that the other party's point of view cannot be established under the additional conditions, or draw a conclusion diametrically opposed to the other party's point of view.

1. Common skills for refutation 1: convince people with reason and refute them head-on.

This is the most common rebuttal. It is the use of the simplest language and the simplest logical reasoning to prove the error of the other person's point of view. This approach is suitable for arguments that are well prepared by the other side and not sufficiently proven by the other party.

Arguments and rebuttals are so laborious that they should only be used in the debate arena on the arguments that are most closely related to the debate. It should be noted that Jian Feng's closed cleaning is the key to success in positive reasoning and rebuttal.

2. Common techniques for refutation 2:-for-tat, tooth for tooth.

In the debate field, if the opponent's debater is full of witty words, don't panic. The idea of-for-tat is to ask the audience to repay the applause given to the opposing debater. The method is very simple, that is, under the guidance of the other party's wonderful words, immediately find a similar fact that is beneficial to oneself, and return the favor, which gives people a sense of superiority.

This rubber-like refutation does not lie in showing the logical relationship between things. It's about showing the wit of the debater.