Thank you for the determination of responsibility for traffic accidents.

Now the road has no primary and secondary distinction in the traffic rules, there is no traffic light and no yield sign, it is necessary to abide by the right side of the first, before entering the intersection to carefully observe and then pass, to you pass through the intersection does not affect the normal driving of the vehicle on the right, the right vehicle hit you, indicating that you hindered the normal driving of the right, the responsibility is great. The other party's motorcycle was drunk and the vehicle was not inspected on time, and it did not fulfill its obligation to pay attention to safety, so it also has to bear certain responsibilities. There is nothing wrong with this accident, unless the other party is seriously speeding and you can't judge normally, but this kind of evidence is difficult to find.

According to the traffic accident you described, the answer to the question you asked is as follows:

1.According to the regulations, the vehicle on the right should be allowed to go first, but at that time, there was no main and secondary road at the intersection, there was no traffic light, and the family was about to pass the intersection, and the motorcycle hit the rear of the three-wheeled motorcycle driven by the family, will there be a difference in the determination of responsibility?

Answer: In accordance with Article 48 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, on roads without central isolation facilities or without a central line, motor vehicles shall comply with the following provisions when encountering vehicles coming from opposite directions: (1) Slow down and drive on the right, and keep the necessary safety distance from other vehicles and pedestrians.

Therefore, when the traffic police conducted an investigation at the scene of the accident, the result of determining responsibility was correct.

2. If I drive a motorcycle without a driving license and am drunk driving, does it have any impact on the determination of responsibility for the accident?

Answer: The determination of accident responsibility and whether the traffic participants have traffic violations and whether they should be punished are two concepts, that is, it does not affect the determination of accident responsibility.

The traffic police have a lot of discretion in this accident, and its handling is mainly based on two laws:

The first is the division of responsibilities. Article 91 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Traffic Law: "The traffic management department of the public security organ shall determine the responsibility of the parties to the traffic accident according to the role played by the behavior of the parties involved in the traffic accident and the severity of the fault. ”

The second is the provisions on giving way: Article 52 of the Regulations for the Implementation of the Traffic Law: "When a motor vehicle passes through an intersection without traffic signal control and no traffic police command, it shall also comply with the following provisions:

2) If there are no traffic signs or markings, stop and look out before entering the intersection, and let the oncoming traffic on the right road go first; ”。

In this accident, the other party did not have a driving license and was drunk driving, and according to the regulations, it can only be punished as unlicensed and drunk driving, which does not affect the determination of accident responsibility, but does not rule out the possibility that the traffic police handling the case may determine that the other party is mainly responsible. Therefore, the possibility of the traffic police judging that you are fully responsible, primarily responsible, equally responsible, and secondarily responsible exists, and the key is to look at the understanding of the traffic police handling the case.

If it were me, I would judge the motorcycle party from a fair point of view, but it is beyond reproach to award you from a legal point of view. I don't know if I made it clear.

There are thousands of roads, and the first article of safety is the knowledge of the division of responsibility for traffic accidents that must be known for May Day travel.

Electric vehicle controllers can be broadly divided into two categories: brushed and brushless. Brush controllers are divided into brushed ordinary controllers and brushed intelligent controllers; Brushless controllers are divided into brushless ordinary controllers and brushless intelligent controllers.

The brushed ordinary controller is used in conjunction with the brushed motor. The structure is simple, the failure rate is relatively low, and the cost is also low. Now the ordinary brush controller is basically eliminated, and some of the earlier electric vehicles are still in use.

The brushed intelligent controller is used in conjunction with the brushed motor. The structure and cost are similar to those of ordinary controllers, but with more 1:1 power assist functions. In fact, this kind of controller is also gradually being phased out.

The controller is connected to the motor.

The brushless ordinary controller is matched with the brushless motor, which has a more complex manufacturing structure, a higher failure rate, and a higher cost, and is also more expensive than the brushed controller.

The brushless intelligent controller is used in conjunction with the brushless motor, which has a more complex structure and various functions such as power assist, electric, and fixed speed. At present, the use of this kind of controller is popular, although the cost is a little higher, but the intelligence is always better than the ordinary.

The biggest difference between ordinary controllers and intelligent controllers is: first, the intelligent controller is larger than the ordinary controller; Second, the internal electronic components are different, and the intelligence is more than ordinary; Third, the intelligent controller is fully functional, and it should be high. However, whether it is brushed or brushless, whether it is ordinary or intelligent, it is necessary to correctly distinguish the controller and choose the controller that matches the motor for maintenance.

Traffic accidents are simpler, so they will be faster. Results are usually available within a week. The determination of liability for traffic accidents is faster than other administrative documents.

Generally, as soon as the results come out, you can pick up the car, and you can pick up the car directly without responsibility. The responsible party needs to pay a fine and wait for the traffic police brigade to confirm that the car can be picked up before going to the parking point to pick up the car. The responsible party, if it is unlucky and happens that the traffic police brigade has a lot of things, it may take two or three days to pick up the car.

Of course, sometimes there are special circumstances, and it may take more time to issue a liability determination. For example, if the traffic accident is major and the scene is tragic, it is necessary to organize multiple people to conduct an inquest and inspection, and wait until the work at the scene is completed. It is necessary to find the victims to verify the situation, and then they have to find the appraisal agency and other organizations designated by the bureau to conduct appraisal and investigation.

After the results are available, a specific determination of responsibility can be made. This is the more troublesome thing, and it may take about a month.

There is also a more nerve-wracking situation, which can be said to take more time to determine the liability, or it may be very fast. Because time is uncertain. If the traffic perpetrator runs away after the accident, then the traffic police brigade must form a working group to find out where the vehicle involved in the accident is, and after finding the vehicle, it is necessary to arrest the person before starting to make a liability determination.

How long it will take for this to happen is hard to say.

Traffic accident liability is divided into several types (1) all liability. If a traffic accident is caused by a party's violation, the party with the violation shall bear full responsibility, and the other party shall not bear the responsibility for the accident. (2) Equal responsibility.

If the violations of the two parties jointly cause a traffic accident, the two parties shall be equally liable if the role is proportionate. (3) Primary and secondary responsibility. If the violations of the rules of both parties jointly cause a traffic accident, and the violation plays a large role in the traffic accident, one party shall bear the primary responsibility and the other party shall bear secondary responsibility.

4) Where the violations of the rules and regulations of three or more parties jointly cause an accident, the responsibility shall be divided according to the role of each party in the traffic accident. (5) Presumptive responsibility 1, where a party escapes or deliberately destroys a falsified scene or destroys evidence, making it impossible to determine the responsibility for a traffic accident, he shall bear full responsibility. 2. If one of the parties fails to report the case before the first time or fails to report the case in a timely manner, so that the responsibility for the traffic accident cannot be determined, it shall bear full responsibility.

3. Where all parties have reported the case before but neither of them has reported the case or failed to report the case in a timely manner, so that the responsibility for the traffic accident cannot be determined, they shall bear equal responsibility. However, in the event of a traffic accident between a motor vehicle, a non-motor vehicle, or a pedestrian, the motor vehicle shall be the main party.

How to divide the responsibility for traffic accidents (1) One party shall bear full responsibility for the determination of responsibility under any of the following circumstances: 1. The facts of the accident cannot be ascertained due to escape; 2. Intentionally destroying or falsifying the scene or destroying evidence; 3. Continue to pass at a red light at an intersection; 4. Motor vehicles crossing roads or isolation facilities; 5. Motor vehicles enter non-motor vehicle lanes in violation of regulations; 6. A motor vehicle scrapes a pedestrian on the sidewalk; 7. A motor vehicle scrapes and collides with a pedestrian at a crosswalk in accordance with the law; 8. Failure to avoid emergency vehicles such as police cars; 9. Accidents caused by spillage of vehicle loads; 10. Accidents with the vehicle behind the vehicle when reversing; 11. Traffic accidents occur in the wrong direction of non-motor vehicles; 12. A traffic accident occurs when a non-motor vehicle overtakes other vehicles. (2) One or both of the parties shall not be liable under any of the following circumstances:

1. None of the parties is at fault for causing the traffic accident, and if it is a traffic accident, all parties are not liable. 2. If one party intentionally causes a traffic accident, the other party is not liable; 3. If one party is at fault and the other parties are not at fault, the one at fault is fully responsible and not at fault.

Responsibility for traffic accidents is divided by the traffic police. However, there are several situations in which the vehicle in front needs to be fully or partially responsible for the rear-end collision. 1：

U-turn When the vehicle is U-turned, rear-ended by a straight-going vehicle or a collision or other accidents, you can refer to the provisions of Article 52 of the "Regulations for the Implementation of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China" that "the turning motor vehicle should give way to the vehicle going straight ahead", which is the principle of "turning and going straight", which is usually the principle of "turning and going straight", in this case, the U-turn vehicle bears the responsibility for the accident. 2: Pressing the line and adding stoppers In the process of driving, if the front car is driving on the line (whether it is a dotted line or a solid line) or in the process of emergency merging, a rear-end collision accident occurs with the rear car, the front car bears the responsibility for the accident.

But there is a condition in this situation, that is, it must be in the process of driving the behavior of the front car pressing the line affects the normal driving of the rear car and rear-end collision, if the front car is waiting for a red light or traffic jam and stopped and has not moved, and the rear car rear-ended the front car at this time, then the rear car is still fully responsible. 3: deliberately create a dangerous situation I believe that many netizens have seen the driving of the fighting car, in front of the driving of the fighting car often have emergency braking, emergency merging and other deliberate provocative behavior, in the process if the rear is provoked by the vehicle hit the front car, the rear car is not responsible, the responsibility for the accident by the provocative front car is responsible.

What I want to remind everyone here is that after a rear-end accident, the rear car needs to show evidence that the front car has a vindictive car (such as **, etc.) before it can be determined, otherwise the police uncle will not listen to one side. 4: Reversing, rolling or "overtaking on the right" When you encounter a situation where the car in front is reversing, or slipping, you should not rush to reverse and avoid.

Because the rear-end collision accident in this case is generally caused by the car in front. There is also a situation where the car in front has the behavior of "overtaking on the right side" mentioned in the traffic regulations, and the car in front also needs to bear part of the responsibility. About overtaking on the right:

The rear car in the same lane, merging into the right lane, overtaking the car in front, and immediately returning to the original lane, this situation is "overtaking on the right", which is a violation. However, in these cases, you also need to have evidence to prove that it is the fault of the other party, such as the ** of the dash cam, etc. Hint:

In addition to the above common situations, the vehicle in front is also responsible for a rear-end collision in some specific situations. In the vast majority of cases, the rear car is solely responsible for the rear-end collision, because the traffic regulations clearly state that "the vehicle needs to keep a sufficient distance".

This is the situation you described. Identify non-motorized vehicles. Access to the motorized lane.

At the same time, it leads to accidents. Then non-motorized vehicles. The responsibility is greater.

to the traffic law has clear provisions. There are non-motorized lanes. Non-motorized vehicles are not allowed to enter the motorized lane.

Accidents happened. Whether there was a collision or not. The driver who caused the accident.

Not sure either. First, it can be retrieved. Monitoring of the place of the incident.

There is no monitoring. The traffic police may entrust a third party to identify the traces of motor vehicle collisions. The results of the appraisal are then used to determine whether a collision has occurred.

This kind of last traffic police will be based. The results of the appraisal and the accident history are divided into responsibilities. The motor vehicle involved in the accident will certainly not be solely responsible.

Should be. The main responsibility bears for the elderly who are not motorized. Your father has secondary responsibility.

It also depends on the results of the vehicle appraisal. Are there any other problems with the vehicle's performance? Like brakes. Finally, the traffic police made a responsibility division according to the appraisal results, the accident, and the specific situation of the scene.

The vehicle only has compulsory insurance. Then the maximum amount paid by the insurance company is 120,000. The part that exceeds the compulsory traffic insurance. Your father is the one who bears it personally.

Find out if there is a camera nearby, or other evidence that can restore the scene, if the two parties are indeed not in contact, you should not be responsible for the situation you said, and you should confirm the situation to the traffic police department to determine whether you are responsible for the accident.

According to your description, your father is driving normally, and if there are no other traffic violations, then he is not liable for the traffic accident, and at most he is secondarily liable. Of course, the ultimate responsibility for the accident should be determined by the traffic police based on the on-site investigation and other circumstances. Secondly, if you are not satisfied with the results of the accident, you can also apply for administrative reconsideration.

The landlord said that the problem is too unclear.

1. The other party's vehicle occupies your lane. (Except for wrong-way driving, between motor vehicles and non-motor vehicles, there is no other occupation!) ）

2. The other party did not return to his own lane If it is driving in the opposite direction and the other party is not a non-motorized vehicle, you should be following the rear of the other party's vehicle.

3. Hit the direction of the inside hand Can I think that you hit the direction to the right? No matter which direction you're going to the right, it's impossible to get into the opposite lane. So I can tell that you're on at least a two-way four-lane road, and you're driving in the driving lane or overtaking lane from west to east (possibly in either direction).

The rear vehicle overtakes and merges into your lane, and then you want to overtake from the other lane, but the front vehicle merges into his lane that you want to overtake and thus an accident occurs. Right?

4. If the situation is the same as the above 3, it depends on the collision position between your car and the other party's car, as well as the parking position of the other party's vehicle. If both your car and the other car are in the lane without a line and your front collides with the rear of the other person's car, you are solely responsible. According to you, it is likely that he forcibly merged the line responsible, you did not judge the safety distance responsible!

One person and half responsibility!!