Please teach the master Since the infinitive can be converted into a clause, then what else do you n

That is, the negative word of the clause is placed in the main clause, but the translation remains the same.

For example: i don't think he will cme .I don't think he's coming.

If you want to negate the object clause of think, believe, suppose, expect, iimagine, etc., the negative word not never must be transferred to the main clause, that is, to negate the above verb, not to be negated in the clause, which is a negative transfer.

The formal negation of the predicate of the main clause is actually the negation of the predicate of the subordinate clause.

When the subject of the verbs think, believe, suppose, imagine, expect, feel is the first person, and the predicate verb is in the general present without any adverb modification, their negative form is actually the negation of the object clause. Indicates that the speaker is presenting a euphemistic opinion or assertion.

When the subject of the verbs think, believe, suppose, imagine, expect, feel, find is the first person, and the predicate verb is the simple present without any adverb modification, the negative before them is actually the negation of the compound object. Indicates a euphemistic opinion or assertion made by the speaker.

If you want to negate the object clause of think, believe, suppose, expect, iimagine, etc., the negative word not never must be transferred to the main clause, that is, to negate the above verb, not to be negated in the clause, which is a negative transfer. For example:

i didn't think he would come on time.I didn't think he would come on time

i don't believe there is any ghosts in the world."I firmly believe that there are no ghosts in the world."

he doesn't suppose that it is working.[He doesn't think it's going to work].

Such as: i don't think he is right.

I don't think he's right.

(1) When it means the active and ongoing action, it can be rewritten with the present participle. Such as:

i know the girl who is talking to the teacher.

i know the girl talking to the teacher.

I knew the girl who was talking to the teacher.

2) When indicating passive, the action that has been completed is rephrased with a past participle, such as:

shirts which are made of silk are very expensive.

shirts made of silk are very expensive.

Silk shirts are expensive.

3) Indicate future actions, rephrased with verb infinitives, e.g

the problem which is going to be discussed tomorrow is our quarterly meeting.

the problem to be discussed tomorrow is our quarterly meeting.

The issue to be discussed tomorrow is our quarterly meeting.

Antecedents are isolated from definite clauses.

The definite clause is generally followed by the antecedent, but other components are sometimes inserted between the definite clause and the precedent pure line to form the separation of the antecedent and the definite clause. For example:

1) this is the article written by him that is poke to you about..

2) he was the only person in this country who was invited

3)a new master will come tomorrow who will teach you german.Tomorrow a new teacher will come to teach you German. (Relative pronouns.)

The who-guided definite clause is separated from its antecedent master).

In fact, the order of the sentences is reversed, and your sentence can not also be written:

airplane,which usually employed in transporting people,is the most effective means of transportation? Then it's time to sell fiber words first.

Just do the skin two different expressions. You don't have to be so careful.