Debate on which is more important, learning from experience or self exploration

Experience is more important for those who possess competence (because experience is another form of competency). Inside.

Knowledge is more important for those who do not have the capacity to do so (because learning knowledge is the vehicle for forming ability).

For those who are very capable, they can form ability from knowledge, accumulate experience from ability, and generate wisdom from experience. Knowledge and experience are insignificant and unimportant. The ability to play a leading and grasping role, knowledge and experience have only become the means and stage of doing things.

For him, practice is all that matters.

Practice and learning are also very important, but in the real society, talent and ability are often reflected, and learning is difficult to exercise, only in practice to sum up experience, so, practice is more important than learning!

A simple example: is a good debater learned by theoretical knowledge or trained in practice? Obviously, practice exercises will and ability more, so it is fully proved that practice is more important than learning!!

It is enough to distinguish the difference between ability and mere theoretical knowledge and grasp the importance of practice ......Finally, good luck and winning the ...... game

Personally, I think practice is important, and the utilization rate of what I learned in college is less than 5% in society

It's all important!

2. When the debate competition is white-hot, the debate is not professional knowledge, but often the comprehensive ability wins; The comprehensive ability is: quick response, rigorous logic,-for-tat counterargument, sharp counterattack by grasping the loopholes of the opponent's language or logic, these things are the magic weapon to win!

You could say that it is like dismantling a landmine, and if you don't have the experience to do it, you will definitely blow it to pieces. With innovation, I knew how to remove new explosions, but I was killed before I could implement it. Or learn to run, if you don't have the experience of walking, why do you want to run.

With innovation, I know how to learn how to run shortcuts, but I can't take it, and I "show" my strength there, and before I succeed, I fell first.

First-class people: can innovate.

Second-rate people: can imitate.

Third-rate people: blind obedience.

Surely knowledge is important. Because production and life are constantly changing with each passing day, experience will soon be obsolete, and only knowledge will keep pace with the times. For example, repairing household appliances, if onlyAloneExperience will quickly become useless, because the upgrade is too fast, and if you keep learning, you will still be free.