What does it mean to suffer from inequality rather than few ? Is it an unbiased point of view?

Just. As a modern person, this sentence should be understood in life, when working together to get interest, not afraid of earning less and sharing equally, afraid of one party's more and one party's less, which will cause dissatisfaction and affect the smooth progress of the next thing.

Additional Information:1) The original text is as follows:

Do not suffer from widowhood but suffer from inequality": "Qiu also heard that those who have a country and a family do not suffer from widowhood but suffer from inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but suffer from anxiety. There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination. If the husband is so, so people from afar are not satisfied, then they will repair Wende. If it comes, it will be safe. ”

2) Translated as follows:

I have heard that for princes and doctors, they do not worry about poverty, but about unequal wealth; Don't worry about a small population, but worry about instability. Since wealth is equalized, there is no such thing as poverty; If everyone is in harmony, you will not feel that there are few people; When it is settled, there is no danger of overturning. Because of this, if those who are far away are not submitted, they are invited with kindness, righteousness, courtesy, and pleasure. It's already here, let them live in peace.

3) Encyclopedia

Not suffering from the lack of wealth but suffering from unevenness refers to Confucius.

One of the ideas of taxation proposed. Confucius pointed out in the Analects of the Sixteenth Chronicles: "Those who have a country and a family do not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but anxiety.

There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination. This means that the princes of a kingdom or the doctors of a fiefdom should not worry about the lack of wealth, but only about the uneven distribution of wealth; Don't worry about the lack of people, but just watch out for the unrest in the territory; If wealth is evenly distributed, there is no such thing as poverty; When the people live in harmony, they do not feel that there are few people; There is no danger of the loss of the country if the territory is peaceful.

4) Background

Momentary. It is the 'Eastern Mongolian Lord' of Lu Jun (the first king), and if the Ji clan preempts it, it will inevitably cause social turmoil, and it will be "uneasy". Then, Confucius criticized Ran You.

and Ji Lu, "people from afar are not satisfied and cannot come, the state is divided and cannot be defended, and plotting to fight in the state" is wrong. At the end of the article, "I am afraid of Ji Sun's worries, not in the blink but on the wall."

"Inside", showing Confucius's high degree of political sensitivity and political insight. Confucius had already seen through the ultimate goal of Ji's crusade against the Lu State was actually to weaken the Lu State.

's strength, and even usurping the power of the Lu State, in this sense, Ji's behavior was just a tentative demonstration of force, so the last sentence broke Ji's conspiracy, in one sentence.

Personally, I understand that there may be two meanings when quoting this sentence now.

Not worried about poverty, but worried about unequal distribution. There is no need to worry about poverty, but about unequal distribution. In the original word, it is the second meaning.

Yes, you can't. But it can't be uneven.

does not mean "do not suffer from material scarcity, the key is to distribute it evenly (so that everyone is balanced); There is no need to worry about the poverty of the common people, the key is to let them keep to themselves (and thus prevent rebellion). ”

But. The key is to have fair and reasonable governance, so that the people can develop production with peace of mind, gradually get rid of poverty, and live a prosperous life. If the government is harmonious, the people are happy, and the civilization is prosperous, they can appease the "distant people" to submit.

Web Links.

1. The meaning of people who do not suffer from widowhood but suffer from inequality: whether it is a prince of a country or a doctor of a fiefdom, he should not worry about the lack of wealth, but only worry about the uneven distribution of wealth; Don't worry about the lack of people, but just watch out for the unrest in the territory; If wealth is evenly distributed, there is no such thing as poverty; When the people live in harmony, they do not feel that there are few people; There is no danger of the loss of the country if the territory is peaceful.

2. Suffering from inequality refers to one of the tax ideas put forward by Confucius. Confucius pointed out in the sixteenth chapter of the Analects of Ji: "Those who have a country and a family do not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but suffer from anxiety. There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination. ”

The original writer does not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and does not suffer from poverty but suffers from anxiety; There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination. Husbands and things do not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but suffer from anxiety; There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination. Translation: Don't worry about not having enough wealth, but about the unequal distribution of wealth; Don't worry about too few people, but worry about instability and disharmony.

There is only distributive equity, there is no poverty and insecurity, there is only solidarity, there is no overthrow.

1. "People do not suffer from widowhood but suffer from inequality" means that people are not worried about poverty, but about wealth inequality. It is a fair point of view, because the gap between rich and poor is far more difficult to manage than poverty together. The original text is from the pre-Qin Confucius's "Ji's Will Cut the Dawn".

2. In terms of management, "people do not suffer from widowhood but suffer from inequality" is a theory of fairness. The theory of fairness, also known as the theory of social comparison, was proposed by the American psychologist John Stashi Adams in 1965. It is believed that the degree of motivation of employees is higher than the subjective comparison of the proportion of remuneration and input between themselves and the reference object.

3. The basic point of the theory is that people's enthusiasm for work is not only related to the actual remuneration of individuals, but also more closely related to whether people feel fair in the distribution of remuneration. People will always consciously or unconsciously compare the price of their labor and the remuneration they receive with others, and make judgments about whether it is fair or not.

The sense of fairness directly affects the motivation and behavior of employees. Therefore, in a sense, the process of motivation is actually the process of comparing people with each other, making judgments about whether they are fair or not, and guiding behavior accordingly.

Do not suffer from few, but suffer from unevenness"Many people have a misunderstanding of this sentence, and when this sentence is used in people's psychology, there will be such misunderstandings mainly because they have not read the complete sentence. The original sentence of this sentence is: "Those who have a country and a family do not suffer from widowhood but inequality, do not suffer from poverty, cover all without poverty, and have no widowhood, and have no inclination."

This sentence is based on Confucius.

It is also one of the tax ideas put forward by Confucius. <>

1. The meaning of "not suffering from few, but suffering from inequality".

It means that you don't need to worry about the lack of people, you need to worry about the uneven distribution of wealth, you don't need to worry about the lack of wealth, and you need to beware of domestic insecurity. If you want to keep a country in a stable stage, don't let the gap between the rich and the poor be separated.

If it is too big, it is necessary to let the people's lives be in an even state, and if the gap between the rich and the poor in a society is too wide, then there is likely to be turmoil. <>

Second, why are you afraid of this inequality?

Unequal does not mean that everyone has to be evenly distributed, but at least the gap between the rich and the poor should not be too wide. In ancient times, it was not hard work that could be harvested, and most of the land was in the hands of the upper class.

of the hands. This is why many people at the bottom are exploited, and this inequality is caused by this. Some people have other understandings of the inequality here, so it is duty.

It means not worrying about not having enough wealth, but worrying that everyone will not be able to do their part. In ancient times, all classes of society were very distinct, and the wealth in society should be distributed according to the rules, and everyone should keep their duty and get what they deserve. <

3. Other understandings of "not suffering from a small number but suffering from unevenness".

This sentence is sometimes used by Menghong modern people in people's mentality, it doesn't matter if everyone is poor, if some people are poor and some people are rich, then everyone will have an unbalanced psychology. As long as there are people, there will be contradictions, and the intensification of such contradictions is often due to the uneven interests. Society is a group composed of people, and it is more necessary to be fair and just to be able to resolve this contradiction in people's hearts.

There is no complete Gongchong Minhei at any time, and this is a problem that we must face and have to admit. But relative fairness is the truth we seek and aspire to.

The boss is also selfish, and has his own preferences, and when bonuses and wages are paid, people who do the same work and achieve the same results are not necessarily treated fairly.

The significance of why salaries and bonuses are not paid on the surface is obvious. Obviously, there is injustice, otherwise it could have been distributed in a fair and open manner.

We don't have to affect our mentality for that little money, it's not worth sulking, the body is our own, the work is the boss's, and having a good body is better than anything else.

This is said to be renting and squirting to see that everyone wants to be equal, even if everyone is a little less, as long as the type of cherry blossoms is the same, there is no psychological imbalance, once there are more people, some people will be less unbalanced.

This shows that everyone will want to be equal, even if everyone has a little less rent in the state, but as long as the deficit is equal, the psychology will be balanced, and if there are more and some take less, the people will be unbalanced.

It means that they are not afraid of not having much wealth but afraid of uneven distribution.

From the sixteenth chapter of "The Analects of Ji", "Ji's Will Cut Away".

Excerpt from the original text: Please! The gentleman and the husband will give up what they want and will do it. Qiu also heard that those who have a country and a family do not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but suffer from anxiety. There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination.

Translation: Ran You! A gentleman hates the kind of person who doesn't say what he wants to do, but prefers to make excuses (to prevaricate his attitude).

I have heard that scholars and doctors have their own fiefdoms, and they are not afraid of the uneven distribution of wealth but not much wealth, and they are not afraid of instability because of the small number of people. If the distribution of goods is fair and reasonable, there will be no poverty; If there is harmony between the top and bottom, there is no need to worry about the lack of people; When the society is stable, there is no danger of the country overturning.

From the Analects.

Ji's "does not suffer from widowhood but suffers from inequality, and does not suffer from poverty but suffers from anxiety.

Meaning: Not worried about the less, but worried about the uneven distribution, not worried about the people living in poverty, but worried about the instability of life.

From the Analects.

Original text: "Qiu also heard that those who have a country and a family do not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and do not suffer from poverty but suffer from anxiety. There is no poverty, no widowhood, and no inclination. If the husband is so, so people from afar are not satisfied, then they will repair Wende. If it comes, it will be safe. ”

It reflects Confucius's anti-war thoughts. He did not advocate solving international and domestic problems through military means, but hoped to solve them in a way of courtesy, righteousness, benevolence, and happiness, which was Confucius's consistent thought. Confucius proposed that "we should not suffer from widowhood but inequality, and we should not suffer from poverty but suffer from anxiety".

Zhu Xi's interpretation of this sentence is: "Even, each has its own point; Ann means that the upper and lower are safe. This kind of thinking has a great impact on future generations, and even becomes people's social psychology.

Today, there is a negative side to this kind of thinking, but it still has an aspect of adapting to modern society, and the stability of modern society actually depends on a certain average, and if the gap between the rich and the poor is too wide, society may fall apart. Moreover, "not suffering from a small number but suffering from inequality" is also in line with the socialist idea of fairness and justice.

From the full translation of the Analects: the sixteenth chapter of Ji.

Don't worry about less sharing, but worry about uneven distribution.

I don't worry about how much I distribute, but I am worried about uneven distribution, from the Analects.