If a person dies after drinking at a party, how can the organizer participants be held responsible?

During the Spring Festival of 2019, a group of doctors from a hospital in our small town had a dinner party on a weekend, and during the dinner, everyone drank wine together, a total of 11 people. One of the doctors, surnamed Wang, went home to sleep after drinking, and when he got up on the second morning, his body was already stiff, and of course he had been dead for a long time.

In the end, it was detected that it was caused by drinking, and of course this matter did not lead to a lawsuit. In addition, the 10 people who drank alcohol voluntarily contributed 50,000 yuan after discussion, and as a result, they paid 500,000 yuan to the doctor's family, and the cash was handed over to the family, and the family did not prosecute, and the matter ended in this way.

The above example is intended to illustrate that if anyone at the table is drinking and has an accident because of drinking, anyone at the table may not be able to get out of the way, and it is not a question of who organizes or not, nor is it a question of only the organizer being responsible.

In fact, this kind of sharing of responsibility for accidents caused by drinking has become a conventional norm and is protected and recognized by civil law, and is recognized and accepted by everyone. So now more and more people have taken a conservative and cautious attitude towards drinking, if a person needs to drive, or a person has taken cephalosporin and other drugs, or someone has cardiovascular diseases, other people here generally will not advise drinking, because everyone knows in their hearts that once the person with the body itself has an accident because of drinking, then anyone involved in drinking may be held responsible.

Through the above analysis, we find that at a drinking table, as long as anyone involved in drinking has an event such as the death of a drinker, as long as anyone involved in drinking must be held responsible, it does not matter much about who organized the wine at this table, but has to do with everyone involved in drinking. It is also for this reason that everyone is becoming more and more cautious and cautious about drinking, which is of course a good thing. Because after all, excessive drinking may cause harm to the body at least and worry about life, so the losses caused are also huge.

Yanzi has a point of view).

The organizer participants do not have to bear any responsibility, because this incident has nothing to do with the organizer participants and is an accident.

This situation should be analyzed in detail, and it is nothing more than several possibilities: 1The death had nothing to do with the party, it was purely a coincidence.

2. Classmates advised to drink alcohol, resulting in excessive drinking and death from alcohol poisoning. 3. Usually suffering from a more serious disease, tired journey, poor rest, coupled with excessive mental excitement, a variety of factors cause sudden death. Whether the convener and the participants of the meeting have any responsibility and how much responsibility they have needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis.

If you resort to law, you need evidence to speak. As for the voluntary bereavement pension between classmates out of friendship after an unfortunate accident, it is another issue.

First, for banquet attendees, they must be responsible for drinking alcohol and act according to their own circumstances.

Second, for the organizer of the party, the act of organizing the party creates certain obligations. The organizer of the meeting shall fulfill the obligation to remind, dissuade, and notify; If a party participant is intoxicated, the organizer shall fulfill the obligation to support, care and escort the drinker to ensure the personal safety of the drinker. When holding a banquet, the organizer should prepare a quantity of alcohol that is appropriate to the number of people attending the banquet, and remind participants to drink in moderation and discourage excessive drinking.

When a participant is found to be intoxicated, the participant's family shall be promptly notified, and the participant shall be placed in a safe place, and must not be allowed to go out alone. If you are drunk with a sudden illness, you should be sent to the hospital urgently.

If a person dies after drinking at a party, I think the organizers should be responsible for compensating the family of the deceased with a certain amount of compensation, and in the most serious cases, they should also bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

In this case, you should not be responsible, and the responsibility for the death caused by drinking at the party should be at the same table, and those who know that the other party cannot drink, or know that they have a medical history, and those who persuade others to die due to alcohol should be held responsible.

I think everyone's thoughts are different, drinking at a party is a happy thing, if drinking leads to death, I think the people who drink together should not be responsible, drinking is through their own consent, and it is not forced by others to let you drink, so I think the people who drink together should not be responsible.

If you don't know this drinker, you won't be held accountable for this. This does not mean that everyone in the drinking field is responsible, this situation can only show that the person who drinks is responsible for himself, if it causes death, this situation of drinking and accompanying wine is more or less responsible.

If the person at the table does not persuade the person to drink, the person at the same table is not responsible, and if there is an act of persuasion, the person who drinks must be responsible.

Drinking at a party kills people. The people who drink at the same table are responsible. There are quite a few precedents for this. A person who drinks alcohol is liable to bear the financial compensation. It is the responsibility to give the family of the deceased a certain amount of financial compensation.

Now it seems that it is stipulated that if the persuasion of alcohol leads to the death of a person due to drinking, there should be joint and several liability, and it depends on who is the guest at the party, and it depends on the specific situation, basically everyone present should have a certain responsibility.

As long as you don't have an invitation and you don't persuade you to drink.

You don't have responsibility.

What's more, if you don't know him, you certainly have no responsibility.

Hello friends, everyone who drinks and sits together is responsible, if one of them dies, they all have to bear the financial compensation, friend, drink less alcohol and drink more tea, I wish you a happy life.

Now there are new regulations. As long as you don't persuade to drink. Those who drink to death are responsible for themselves. You can consult a lawyer.

Some time ago, there was already such a case in the news that drinking at a party caused death, and the people who drank together should bear the corresponding responsibility.

Those who forcibly persuade people to drink, or where the convener fails to fulfill their responsibilities such as reminding them to help, they must bear some responsibility.

If someone dies as a result of drinking at a party, the person who eats at the same table will be held legally responsible.

If a person dies due to drinking at a party, the person who drinks with him is liable for financial compensation.

Yes, it is stipulated by law that there is responsibility and compensation.

Don't worry about different tables, no problem.

Guilty.

Drinking at the party, someone died, and others were responsible for supplementing Sun Muxi. In most cases, the person who has suffered the personal injury is responsible for the loss. However, in the event of forced persuasion, malicious persuasion, drunkenness and failure to ensure the safety of the drinker, the co-drinker shall also be liable for compensation.

If the companion has fulfilled the obligation to remind, dissuade, notify the family, take care of, and escort, the companion is not at fault and does not need to be compensated.

Article 1165 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where an actor infringes upon the rights and interests of another person due to his fault and causes harm, he shall bear tort liability. Where it is presumed that the perpetrator is at fault in accordance with the provisions of law, and he cannot prove that he is not at fault, he shall bear tort liability. Article 1166 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China: Where an actor causes harm to the civil rights and interests of others, regardless of whether the actor is at fault, and the law provides that tort liability shall be borne, follow those provisions.

As a social person, it is indispensable to drink at a party, but the unfortunate consequences of death due to drinking are also common, so who should bear the responsibility for this situation? This one is legallyThe person should bear the main or full responsibility for the consequences of drinking, and the "drinking friends" who drank with the victim should also bear the corresponding liability for compensation.

During the New Year's holidays, weddings and funerals, and when we encounter happy things to have a party, we eat and drink together to eat and drink together is a scene that we can often encounter in life. According to relevant investigations, in recent years, cases of death and injury caused by drinking have occurred from time to time, and the absolute number of such cases is not large, but the disputes between the parties are relatively large. As a social activity, drinking together is an act of friendship, which does not give rise to a legal relationship of rights and obligations, and each drinker should have the highest duty of care for his or her own life safety.

In the news, we can often see some people who feel unwell after drinking at a party, and after being taken to the hospital, they die after rescue efforts fail. So when such a situation happens, it can be said that everyone does not want to see the result, but once such a situation occurs, it is reasonable for the family to call the police and demand that the person who drank with him be held responsible. Gatherings are a good thing, not only to touch feelings, but also to solve things that may not be easy to solve in normal times.

However, only if you drink alcohol in moderation,Although the contents of the cup are good, do not be greedy for the cup. As a drinking friend who drinks together, it is not necessary to discourage drinking, and the drinker himself should be discouraged from indulging in drinking, so as to avoid adverse consequences.

For some people who like to drink more themselves, as people with full capacity for civil conduct, they should know their own alcohol consumption and physical condition, and should have the ability to foresee the consequences of excessive drinking that may cause harmThe drinker bears primary responsibility for the consequences of his or her indulgence, but the co-drinker also bears secondary responsibility.

As the saying goes,Drinking together is risky, and drinkers should be cautious. I hope that all of us can learn from these unfortunate events and drink in moderation without pestering others. Otherwise, if you blindly get carried away at a happy gathering, drink heartily, and make it difficult for others, you are likely to end up hurting others and yourself and fighting in court.

The person who advises the drinker should bear the primary responsibility, the others should bear the secondary responsibility, and if there is no drinker, the person who drinks with him will bear the main responsibility.

Death caused by drinking at a party should be borne by all those present at the party.

Take it yourself, no one forces him to drink, and if something happens, you have to take responsibility for it.