What about justice as fairness, and what is the difference between justice and fairness?

First, the meaning of the expression is different1. Justice: Justice is the highest concept of the appropriate relationship between all members of a society, that is, through the fair and reasonable distribution of social roles within a certain social scope, so that each member can get what he deserves.

2. Fairness: Deal with things reasonably and without favoring one side or the other.

Second, the attributes are different1. Justice: Justice has a value orientation.

Sex. 2. Fairness: Fairness has instrumental attributes.

Third, the focus is different1. Justice: The focus of fairness lies in the value orientation of fairness and justice.

2. Fairness: The focus of fairness is on the scale of fairness.

After reading a lot of answers, the narrative is more complicated. It is not possible for the reader to gain a clear understanding in a concise explanation.

I think: fairness is a description of the state of the starting line. (Equal Opportunity).

Justice, on the other hand, is a description of the state of the outcome (the pursuit of disparities that are not too disparity).

Impartiality: Which ruler to choose.

Fairness: Choose the same ruler.

Let me give you an example.

Fairness is relative to between A and B;

Justice is relative to C and A, C and B.

Fairness is just fairness.

Justice is the abbreviation of fairness and justice.

The meaning is similar, and I can't explain it.

Fairness and justice.

It should also be based on the premise of openness.

There is no monetary benefit.

As far as the basic concept of justice in modern society is concerned, there are three main concepts, namely: the concept of equality, the concept of freedom and the concept of social cooperation. It is these three basic ideas that form the theoretical cornerstone of the principle of justice in the modern sense.

1) The concept of equality is the primary conceptual basis of justice. The concept of equality affirms, first and foremost, the basic contribution of the human person and the dignity of the species. The existence of human society and the preservation of its own dignity are inseparable from the contribution and dignity of the human being as an individual.

Marx pointed out that "the first premise of all human history is undoubtedly the existence of the living individual." (Note: Selected Works of Marx and Engels, Vol. 1, People's Publishing House, 1995, p. 67.)

It is from these countless individuals that society is formed. Without the individual, there is no society. In the sense of concluding society, the basic contribution of each individual is indispensable and equal.

It is precisely because of the "premise contribution" of each individual that society has its own unique dignity, and the individual has the corresponding human dignity. (2) The two ideas of freedom and equality are closely related. The difference between the two is:

Equality focuses on the affirmation and protection of the basic species of an individual, while freedom focuses on the respect and protection of individual differences that individuals have. The main contents of the concept of freedom are: first, to protect the autonomy of individual people.

Second, we should respect the reasonable differences of individual individuals. Thirdly, freedom also includes appropriate areas, such as freedom of conscience in the broadest sense, freedom of thought and feelings, freedom of opinion, freedom to do as you like, freedom of association of individuals, and so on.

Fourth, freedom should be based on reason. Human freedom should be restrained, and therefore need to be guided by reason. The specific requirements of the concept of freedom for the content of the principle of justice are that the differences in the endowments, abilities and specific contributions of individuals should be respected, the development and choices of individuals should be respected, and differentiated treatment should be given according to their contributions to society. Consideration should also be given to the possible negative impact of radical freedoms on society, and the gap between different treatment of individuals should not be excessively widened.

3) A single individual cannot survive, let alone develop. Without society, the individual person ceases to exist. Therefore, individual people need to be combined, and they need to cooperate.

Only through effective social cooperation can individual individuals realize their own values. The concept of social cooperation requires the principle of justice to make up for the parts of the rules of justice based on equality and freedom, and to embody the spirit of a rational society as a whole.

The two meanings of fairness and justice have different emphasis.

The focus of "fairness" is on the scale of fairness; "Justice" focuses on the value orientation of fairness and justice. The Etymology explains justice as: "impartiality, integrity"; The explanation for integrity is:

unbiased, upright and upright"; The explanation for fairness is succinct: "impartiality".

The concepts of justice and fairness are broad and narrow: the concepts of justice and fairness in a broad sense are common terms that have similar meanings and can be used universally. However, the concepts of justice and fairness in the broad sense should not be applied to formal settings.

The two concepts of justice and fairness in the narrow sense, that is, in the strict sense, especially at the theoretical level, have their own clear meanings, and there are some obvious differences between the two.

The basic principles of fairness and justice.

The principle of fairness and impartiality means that the investment analyst must be responsible for the fairness and fairness of the conclusions and reasoning process of the recommendations he puts forward, and shall not provide investment analysis, opinions or suggestions with contrary and contradictory opinions to different investors or clients on the same issue at the same time.

Summary. To put it simply, impartiality means following objective criteria and not taking sides; Fairness, on the other hand, refers to satisfying the reasonable needs and interests of all parties as much as possible, without favoring any party.

In short, impartiality means following objective standards, and sterling silver does not favor any side; Fairness, on the other hand, refers to trying to meet the reasonable needs and interests of each party and not favoring any party.

Can you tell us more about that?

Both justice and fairness refer to the principle that the person or thing should be treated according to the principle of fortune, but there are some differences between them. Impartiality emphasizes treating people or things according to objective and fair standards such as laws, rules, and standards, without favoring any party, and not being affected by personal emotions, interests, and other factors. Justice is the embodiment of laws, systems, rules, etc., and is an objective standard.

Fairness, on the other hand, emphasizes that people or things should be treated equally, justly, and reasonably, without favoritism to any party, and try to meet the reasonable needs and interests of all parties. Fairness is a manifestation of morality, ethics and human nature, and it is a subjective standard.