Difficult English Translation 10, Difficult English Translation

Yongxi Hikari, so I'm sorry I didn't write it to you in time" >…"Thank you for your last letter. I hope the pressure of school doesn't make you sick too much. How are you actually doing?

I know you're studying so hard, and I think I can also be sure of that for you, maybe you'll motivate me to work hard with you, and if you ask me specific questions, I can tell you how the answer is in the United States, but remember, I can't fully understand that you speak Chinese. I never studied Mandarin or Cantonese, I only studied Korean and Japanese and even in those languages my knowledge was limited. I'd like to see your**, but I'm just curious, it's not that important anymore, so if it's not very cheap, my mail** isn't worried.

Arabic to English beta Korean to English betaGerman to French German to English Russian to English beta French to German French to EnglishPortuguese to EnglishJapanese to English betaSpanish to EnglishItalian to EnglishEnglish to Arabic betaEnglish to Korean betaEnglish to GermanEnglish to Russian betaEnglish to FrenchEnglish to PortugueseEnglish to Japanese betaEnglish to SpanishEnglish to ItalianEnglish to Chinese (Traditional) beta English to Chinese (Simplified) beta Chinese to English beta Chinese (Traditional to Simplified) beta Chinese (Simplified to Traditional) beta

Jessica Arthur 17408 Wood St.

Melvindale District.

m 48122 -1082

Do you give that a few points for high difficulty?

Yes, it must be said that the scientist understands the activity of the brain during dreaming, and then this activity may seem to negate the subjective and psychological meaning of the dream. Then the man said: knowing the activity of the brain negates the subjective and psychological meaning of dreams, which is a fallacy, because the brain also acts in the waking mind.

The implication is that you can't deny the subjective and psychological meaning of sober thinking, right?

To simplify the sentence is that is a fallacy

something means a subjective, psychological meaning; For dreams is what is omitted, and the structure of the fallacy itself is:

Subject negates....for dreams more than...for waking thought

To translate it literally, it is: I think such an idea is a fallacy.

If you find it helpful, press the Adopt button.

This is a fallacy: understanding how the brain works can negate its subjectivity and psychological significance, just as the brain's waking thinking can be denied. or repetition (denying its subjectivity and psychological significance. ）

The translation provided above is a bit awkward, and this sentence can find the trunk of the clause, which is action negation. Any more than can not be equated with... any more than and...

It's also no longer the word does, but what it refers to, and it has to be clarified. Does refers to the act of negates a subjective, psychological meaning.

"I think it's a fallacy, knowing that brain behavior negates subjective psychological meaning, more sober thoughts. I think dreams are thinking in a different biochemical state.

Translate it yourself Adopt it Thank you.

It has been argued that although understanding the activity of the brain can enlighten the mind, it has a more negative meaning about the activity of the brain at the subjective psychological level than it enlightens. I don't agree with this statement at all. I don't think there is any difference between dreams and thoughts except for their biochemical state.

I think it's so hard. Mark it, and study it when you have time.