How Pentax K52 avoids chromatic aberration 30

Let's start with the machines I've used, K5II, KM, Canon 650D relatives, 60D borrowed for a few days, 7D and 5DII units. Opinions are personal and do not wish to argue with anyone on this topic.

1.Focusing, which turned out to be Pentax's weakness, is now not a strong point, but it is no longer so obviously weak. In detail, Pentax is still inferior in terms of focusing speed and the number of focus points, but it is still better than Canon in terms of focusing accuracy.

2.Colors, as we all know, Canon are light, Nikon is yellowish, Pentax is showy. It's all the same if there's a late stage. If there is no post-production, it is recommended that Pentax color is the best. Although the evaluation says that Pentax's color is the furthest from the actual one, it is the most beautiful.

3.Workmanship, Pentax has obvious advantages in low-end workmanship, and everyone has come up with real things at the high-end, which should be said to be about the same.

4.Pentax still has an advantage in the compatibility of the lens, and Pentax has never changed the mount (not referring to a change such as an electric shock) is 100% compatible with old lenses, and there are many old lenses as old brands, and they are also very good. It's just for play, not for work.

5.The biggest advantage of Canon and Nikon over Pentax is the overwhelming advertising and huge sales.

6.Regarding the full width, Pentax has a larger 645d than the full width, and now it is about 50,000+, and it is not a technical obstacle to do the full width, but also a limitation of cost and management.

7.The existing lens group, Pentax's lens group is relatively complete except for Canon and Nikon, and if it is only counted as digital, it is temporarily stronger than Sony. The optical design used by the Tuli of the auxiliary factory is basically provided by Pentax. Overall, it can't be said to be complete, but it is definitely sufficient.

You're still struggling with K52 at 3 a.m., haha, I'm ready to get Pentax K52 too. Canon Nikon's advertisements are simply overflowing, and big stars are invited to endorse them, these are all costs. Nikon produced telescopes for the Japanese army during World War II, and its SLR styling department liked it.

To like Pentax is to like his appearance and workmanship, German taste. Like his "few users", the street is full of home users with Nikon Canon, and there are still people who don't know Pentax, which feels super cool. As for the number of focal points, it is a floating cloud, and it depends on its precision.

Pentax's entry-level K30 is all pentaprism, which can be seen in the materials. The K52 has a metal body and is very durable.

We are proud to be in Pentax. Shake hands.

Just like the smell of the sun shining on your body back then.

So many beautiful faces.

Like clouds, like kites.

Nines.

There is still a gap between Pentax focus and Canon.

Are you asking about ** mode or color mode or something else?

**The most used mode is the M gear, the dual wave wheel can be adjusted arbitrarily, and there is a small green key that can quickly adapt to environmental changes ......

If you want to customize the color mode, it will be ...... natural mode at mostIf it's cloudy, it may be clear, and if it's a portrait, it's a portrait mode.

The color of the Canon machine is dull, which is suitable for shooting people, and the face is dull, but it is considered to be white, and it is tender, so it is good. Canon that's it. In addition, the compatibility between high-end machines and PS is quite good, which is easy to post. Commercially available more.

In addition,In terms of direct color,Or picture expression,7D is not as good as K52,Of course,,7D is dual CPU,,Continuous shooting king。 Perfect for weddings.

K52 is an APSC format camera, the image quality should be one of the best, good The reason why there is no 7D good looks is not only the answer upstairs, but also the lens, camera parameters (if you adjust the ISO too high, it will definitely not be good), environment, air quality, various .........

Pentax's SLR is relatively unpopular, and there are fewer lenses, but the cost performance is good. It should be about the same as the Canon 60D.

Pentax plays with lenses, but unfortunately there is a large investment in post-lenses, with Canon 60D 70D and Nikon's D5200 D7100 at the same price

The second fool is the king of the remnants, not blown out, if you don't plan to upgrade the full-frame machine, you will not regret it.

At the same price, Nikon has nothing to do with a stupid machine.

Sony has some machines that can compete with it, of course, Sony can also enter, after all, many Nikon sensors are Sony's.

Pretty good.

The Nikon D3100 can also be considered

The K50 is an entry-level machine, and the K5ii is a mid-range machine, depending on your needs.

1、K52 also has an automatic mode,The same can be very foolish from the perspective of cost performance,K52The parallel cargo fuselage is only a few hundred dollars more expensive than K50。

You're not a grade, K50 is entry-level, K5ii is a mid-range machine, it depends on your needs.

1. The release time is different.

1. Pentax K5: Released on 2010-09-20.

2. Pentax K52: released in 2012.

3. Pentax K52S: mid-October 2012.

Second, the viewfinder type is different.

1. Pentax K5: LCD screen framing, SLR framing.

2. Pentax K52: LCD screen viewfinder, optical viewfinder, pentaprism viewfinder.

3. Pentax K52S: LCD screen viewfinder, optical viewfinder.

Third, the characteristics are different.

1. Pentax K5: In its extremely sturdy and maneuverable body, it integrates a large number of advanced functions that are conducive to photographic creation and visual expression, and surpasses previous models in terms of imaging quality, data processing speed and handling.

2. Pentax K52: AF fine-tuning (can be registered to up to 20) unified tuning, individual adjustment.

3. Pentax K52S: Pentax K52S cancels the low-pass ripple filter.

K5II is an upgrade of K5,,It's a strengthened version,It's the same C format machine,The biggest highlight is that the focus system has been upgraded,Focus capture ability has been significantly improved。 This is also a short board of Pentax,So the significance is greater,In addition,The new image processor is used,There has been optimization in coding,But it's a small change,The biggest improvement is the focus system,In addition,K5IIS and K5IIIs The biggest difference is that S canceled the low-pass filter,Adjust the image coding method,Focus on improving the sharpness of imaging,It's a kind of exploration of Pentax's painting style,The application direction should be a professional。 The S is about 5% more expensive than the regular K1000.

It's not very obvious if it's not 100% magnification,100% magnification The difference is still obvious,Visible to the naked eye,The degree of detail is indeed K52S is more delicate。

If the budget is sufficient, you can't go wrong with the K5S2, but the K52S and K52 have different automatic white balance orientations, the K52S is cold, and the K5II is not, I don't know if it's an example of the machine I use.

The K52 has improved the focus of the K5 The focus points have been increased from 11 to 19, and everything else is basically unchanged.

Based on the K52, the K52S has eliminated the low-pass filter to further improve the image quality, but there is a problem that it is easier to produce moiré lines.

Mainly focusing system and LCD screen upgrades.

K5ii There is no problem in the body parameters, it is a cost-effective mid-range machine, but for professionals, SLR is not to buy a single body, but to buy a systemPentax is not enough to compete with Canon Nikon in the choice of lenses, there are few choices, and there is no cost performance, there is no full frame, and there is not much room for upgrades, so professional-level photographers do not agree with it.

Moreover, Pentax has been sold by a number of companies, it is difficult to judge how to develop in the future, and it is a question of whether to live or not.

There are a lot of young people who eat gnawing chicken, but can you agree that nibbling chicken is better than hand-rolling noodles?!

Pentax's equipment is good, but the sales department is not working well. Now everything depends on advertising, and tens of millions of endorsement fees still have to be paid by consumers! It's better to compare it yourself, photography**Those bricks are not necessarily reliable!

You have a lot of thoughts, and I'll answer them to you one by one:

The head is good, and the scenery and portraits are acceptable; However, the SDM is more rubbish, and the photographers keep complaining, so it is not recommended to buy it; I used to have ideas, but now I don't plan to get in;

There are few people who use it, and they don't make judgments if they don't know it;

It is recommended to buy wide-angle and medium-focus first, I have been looking forward to the Sigma 18-35 now, and the evaluation is very high; With this hang-up head, you can shoot 70% of the subject matter; When you have money in the future, you are buying Star 50-135, don't toss money in the middle, if you want to buy it, buy a good drop; Note that although 50135 is also an SDM, its quality is higher than that of Star 1650;

Which one do you need the most? If you don't know about it, don't buy it first - avoid waste.

Street sweeping with 35 is definitely OK. Scenery 12-24 is good.