How scientists look at 2012, how scientists think

Solar storms, which can interfere with telecommunications and power networks.

I will interpret 2012 for you and debunk the so-called prophecy of the end of the world in 2012:

The so-called Mayan calendar, although it ended in 2012, does not consider this year to be the end of the world. However, December 21, 2012 (Eastern solstice) is an important date. In the Mayan calendar, 1,872,000 days is considered a cycle, i.e. a cycle, a year.

By 2012, a cycle ended, like a clock reset to zero and re-timed. It's exactly the same as our idea of a new year on New Year's Day. So it's not the end of the world.

In addition, the so-called "two-stage reversal", "overlapping celestial bodies", "planets hitting the earth", "solar wind" and other absurd ** have been resolutely denied by scientists.

As for why the Mayans developed such a long calendar? Some scientists believe that this is not because the Mayans were good at prophecy, but because they were trying to prove the past. The further a ruler speaks of his origins, the more he reinforces his dominance, which is why the Mayan rulers used the long calendar.

On a few other words, I disagree with the view of the first floor, the Mayans did not make any prophecies, and if a guess is completely ridiculous, it is not called a prophecy. According to common sense, the end of the world is unlikely to come in 2012. Yes, prophecy is non-scientific, but it is precisely what is not scientific that can be used to disprove it with science.

This is not a lie, but the truth.

However, the words on the first floor are not without reason, and time will tell. Although the scenes in the 2012 movie are impossible to happen, which is proven by scientists, there is a very small chance that some external causes will occur. For example, a nuclear war of a very large scale in just one year (very unlikely, but not impossible), an invasion of the Earth by technologically advanced aliens (almost impossible), or the planting of a giant bomb that has not yet been discovered in prehistory (impossible), only these reasons that cannot be determined can destroy the Earth.

But I don't think this is unfounded, so don't worry.

The characteristic of prophecy is that it is not falsifiable. All assertions are speculative, and you have no way of proving that they are false or true. That's why there is an argument. But there is no doubt that prophecy is non-scientific, something that is not deterministic.

Only time will tell.

If Chinese scientists say that they can prove that 2012 is a fake, this is a lie in itself.

It's pure, science proves everything.

Here's how scientists explain it:

From a solar physics point of view, 2012 is a high year for solar activity, with much more sunspot and flare activity. It seems that there is a movie about this, a large flare of the sun swept away all life on the earth, and in the end it was aliens who came out to help save a few people.

It is said that the Milky Way has a photon belt.

The Earth would have intermittently entered this photon belt at previous times.

The time for each entry was very short before, but each time it was prolonged that it was said that one day in 2012 the Earth would enter this photon belt forever, but what would happen after entering was not said.

As for the tsunami one, I don't think it's that there have been more tsunamis and tsunamis in recent years than before, it's just that everyone is affected by this prophecy (including**) and is more concerned about these things.

Think about it from another angle.

If 2012 really almost everyone is going to die, then what's the point of being afraid of him.