Kong Rong knew how to make pears at the age of 4, why was he finally killed by Cao Cao because of u

As far as I know, Kong Rong wanted to destroy the "filial piety" pseudonym festival at that time because of "Shang Zhen", which angered Cao Cao, so he was finally killed by Cao Cao for "unfilial piety".

We should know that the four-year-old Kong Rong was very polite to his brother, which shows that he was a filial brother at that time. But until he was 13 years old, his father died, Kong Rong's performance was still beyond ordinary people, he was too sad, and finally sadly asked others to help him. The most important thing is that he did not pretend, but showed his true feelings.

It can be seen that Kong Rong's filial piety is not artificial. Why was such a filial person killed by Cao Cao? It's puzzling.

Many people think that Kong Rong grew up as a mediocre person. He was smart when he was a kid, but wasn't he when he grew up? In fact, this is not the case.

The reason for this impression is mainly determined by the social environment at the time. In the troubled times of the Three Kingdoms, the most important thing was to recruit generals who were good at fighting and strategists who could give advice. This is the key to winning the world.

But for what kind of literati, it doesn't matter so much. Kong Rong is a brilliant scholar. His writings were unique at the time and were highly praised by many literati.

So, he's not bad at all. He was born in difficult times and is easily overlooked. In fact, his death was caused by his writings.

At that time, although the selection of **** was based on filial piety and honesty, it became formalism, that is, it did not really look at filial piety. That's why there was a popular nursery rhyme at the time: "Lift up a scholar, and you won't know the book."

If you are filial and honest, your father will be separated. "What do you mean?

You say that a person is very talented, but you don't understand a word. You advise this man to be filial, but he never lives with his father. From the support of our parents, we can see that filial piety and honesty were very hypocritical at that time!

However, Kong Rong was not used to such a trend, so he wrote a satirical article.

As a ruler, how could Cao Cao let others debunk this false veil? This is not conducive to regulation. Besides, Kong Rong is a real man without any constraints.

He became more and more resistant to this false ritual system. In Cao Cao's view, this is obviously not good for himself. As a result, Cao Cao eventually executed him for "unfilial piety" and implicated his family.

And here we can see that this just shows that Kong Rong is a person of "true filial piety", but he died in "Shang Zhen"!

At that time, although the officials elected by the imperial court were all filial piety, it evolved into a kind of formalism later, that is, it was not really looking at filial piety. However, Kong Rong** was used to such a trend, so he wrote an article to be sarcastic. Therefore, in the end, Cao Cao executed him on the charge of "unfilial piety", and at the same time implicated his family.

Because Kong Rong was a very upright person, he dared to directly point out the disadvantages of the imperial court election officials at that time, which made Cao Cao, as the ruler, lose face, so he found an excuse to kill him.

Kong Rong wanted to destroy the "filial piety" pseudonym festival at that time because of "Shang Zhen", which angered Cao Cao, so he was finally killed by Cao Cao because of "unfilial piety".

A person can't just look at how he is by one thing, and how can things when he was a child be compared with what he grew up with, and in ancient times, the social conditions were more complicated, and what happened was not strange.

Because Kong Rong was very filial when he was young, his practices were more liked by adults, but when he grew up, his personality was relatively straight, and when he saw that Cao Cao didn't like it, he directly scolded him, often making Cao Cao lose face, and finally the whole family was killed by Cao Cao, so Cao Cao said that he was not filial.

If people are praised for a long time, they will think that they are very conceited, Kong Rong is such a person, it is normal for Cao Cao not to like him, Kong Rong always touches Cao Cao's bottom line between words, and Cao Cao wants to kill him.

This is because Kong Rong did do unfilial things when he grew older, but it was only because of his talent that no one pursued his affairs, and he also offended many people in the officialdom.

This is actually Cao Cao's charge to Kong Rong'an, he has long been dissatisfied with this big celebrity Kong Rong who is against him, but because Kong Rong's descendants are very famous, he has been patient with him, and after Cao Cao has stinked his reputation, there is no worry about killing him.

Dinosaur was indeed a polite and filial child when he was young, but as he grew older, he was obsessed with power and status, and you lost your youthful original intention.

Because Kong Rong's personality is more arrogant, he will directly say things that he is not used to, once Cao Cao can let him go, and Cao Cao will naturally clean him up if there are many times, he just thinks about himself, and he doesn't think about his family, so Cao Cao said that he is not filial.

Cao Cao was not very satisfied with Kong Rong, and everyone was praising Kong Rong later, so Cao Cao was even more unhappy, so he simply slandered Kong Rong, so that he could make himself a little happier.