What are the reasons why all those who changed the law in ancient times had a tragic end?

In ancient times, people who changed the law had advanced wisdom and long-term vision, and they had the courage to take the lead in proposing changes for the future development of the country.

One of the main reasons is that the law changes often challenge the old authority, and the unconventional approach is usually not easily accepted by the public, and the second is that the law change often violates the interests of the aristocratic privileged class, so it is easy to be united to deal with it.

Power and interests, because changing the law will inevitably weaken the power of some people, and to a certain extent, it will also damage the interests of some people, so those who change the law will be retaliated against.

Without the support of strong contacts and funds, he can't fight a single emperor, and he can't get the support of the people.

Indeed, in several famous changes in Chinese history, almost none of its specific implementers came to a good end. For example, Shang Ying, Wu Qi, Wang Mang, Wang Anshi (dismissed), Zhang Juzheng (liquidated after death), Wuxu Six Gentlemen, etc., are not like this.

These people don't end well, and the reason is actually very simple. It can be seen that almost all important changes in ancient times, such as the Shang Dynasty reform, Wu Qi reform, Wang Mang reform, Wang Anshi reform, Zhang Juzheng reform, and Wuxu reform, have a common law, that is, the time of the change often occurs in the middle and late stages of the dynasty. A dynasty starts from the founding of the country, and then slowly develops, and by the middle and late stages of this dynasty, an inherent interest group has long been formed, and the power of this interest group is bound to be very strong.

The reason why the law needs to be changed is because the vested interests of these interest groups affect the strength of the country, or they affect the authority of the monarch, and this is probably the case.

In view of this reason, those who implement the reform must prescribe the right medicine, and the measures they take must revolve around how to redistribute interests, and since they want to redistribute interests, they will naturally share the cake from the interests of vested groups, and this will reduce their interests. In order to protect their own interests, they naturally made all kinds of difficulties and attacks on the content of the law change and the law changer, and the king (or successor) saw that the situation was not right, in order to calm the anger of the public, and at the same time to protect his own interests, he had to find a substitute for the dead ghost.

Therefore, Tan Sitong will say: "How can there be a person who changed the law in ancient times without bloodshed and sacrificed". Finally, I use Tan Sitong's desperate poem "Inscription Wall in Prison" that I admire as the end of this text:

Looking at the door, he stopped thinking about Zhang Jian, and endured death and waited for Du Gen. I smiled at the sky with my horizontal knife, and went to leave the liver and gallbladder two Kunlun!

Summary: In the end, it is the weakness of the power of changemakers. Some people may think that this sentence is nonsense, but in fact it is well-founded, although the reformers are highly valued by the thighs of those in power (some of them are the biggest in power), there are only a few people who advocate change in each dynasty, and their power is extremely weak compared to the stubborn forces.

Therefore, even if the changemakers themselves are favored for a while, and the diehards are temporarily below, as soon as the balance of power changes, the reformers will be frantically retaliated.

Changing the law and reforming the old system, one thing that cannot be bypassed is that it will offend the powerful, and the reform will inevitably affect the interests of some people, and the powerful who have passively benefited will naturally hold a grudge against these people who lead the reform.

Because the reformers in history were all against those in power, even if they played a role in promoting history, they were not tolerated by the times at the time, so there was no good ending.

Most of the reformers in Chinese history did not end up with a good ending because they started. The idea of changing the law is good, but it may be distorted in the subsequent implementation, so causing their failure to change the law will also make people resentful of him.

Because as long as the welfare of the people is given, in ancient times it was a kind of perverse behavior. They must have threatened the interests of some of the old landlord class, which is why they ended up miserable.

Because changing the law needs to offend a lot of people, and it also needs to offend a lot of princes and nobles, so they will not have a good ending.

The reform of the law must break the existing political pattern, which will inevitably harm the interests of vested interest groups, and vested interest groups will inevitably retaliate against the law-changers because of the loss of their interests, so it is difficult for law-changers to have a good ending.

There are not many successes in Chinese history, such as the Qin State's Shang Dynasty Reform Law, which greatly increased the strength of the Qin State, and the later Ming Dynasty's Zhang Juzheng whip law reform was also very successful.

A: Yes, in this regard, these countries that have succeeded in changing the law have all become rich and powerful, and then have defeated other countries.

The Shang Dynasty was very successful. He made the Qin state gradually very powerful. that they may be united in their hearts.

Shang Ying's transformation was successful. He had the support of the king of the time, and the change had a chance to be realized, thanks to his talent.

Wang Mang's restructuring failedThe failure of the Pentecostal MethodHistorical inevitabilityHistorically, three factors have been needed for the Fa changer to succeed. The first is a policy that is in line with the national conditions and the social productive forces at that time. The second is the support and promotion of political strongmen, that is, rulers.

Third, the method of change can only be achieved by persisting for more than 20 years.

Because the situation at that time did not allow the law to be changed, it would infringe on the interests of those powerful people in the court, and they would not agree to it, and if the emperor insisted on implementing the law change, then the country would perish.

Because of interests, many changes will touch the interests of the old aristocracy, and they must refuse in every way for their own sake, and there is also the possibility of dispersing the imperial power, so many changes are difficult to succeed.

Because these changes lack a mass base, many people don't know why they want to change the law.

Many of the reforms in ancient China failed, and the main reason for these is that the Chinese reforms did not penetrate into the hearts of the people, and their thinking was still very inherent. And it touched the interests of many high-level people. So it didn't work out,

In ancient China, there were changes in the Warring States Period, such as the Hufu cavalry shooting of King Wuling of Zhao, and naturally the Shang Dynasty changes that made the Great Qin State strong, and the Yongzheng paving into the mu in the Qing Dynasty, these changes can be said to have been successful.

In ancient China, there were Shang Ying's reforms, as well as Wang Anshi's reforms, some of which succeeded and some failed. Shang Ying's reform made the Qin state strong, and Wang Anshi's reform failed.

Shang Ying's reform and Wang Anshi's change. The Shang Dynasty Reform took place in the Qin State and was successful; Wang Anshi's reform took place in the Song Dynasty and was unsuccessful.

Guan Zhong reform: also known as Guan Zhong reform law. Li Kui's Reform: The Earliest Change; Shang Yang Reform: The most successful, the most thorough, and the most influential change. Wang Anshi's change: a more famous change.

The fate of the ancient law changers became more and more miserable one by one, and the occurrence of this situation was predictable. In ancient times, the reform of the law would touch the interests of many people, and the first thing that would affect the interests of the ruling class was the interests of the ruling class, although the reform of the law could benefit the people and improve the productivity of the country, but it would also affect the self-interests of the ruling class, so the fate of the reformers would not be very good.

Because they understand the interests of the old school. For example, Shang Ying, although his Shang Yang reform made the Qin State gradually stronger, it also moved the interests of the old nobles of the Qin State at that time, and attracted the hatred of many people.

Because these people have benefited many people in the process of changing society, they will face retaliation from others.

Because the reformers often offend vested interests and are hated by them. Reform is reform, and if there is reform, it will inevitably violate the interests of some people, and once the emperor who supports reform will be retaliated against.

Because it violates the interests of the powerful, the changes are all about taking benefits from the powerful, so it is easy to fail.

Because changing the law is often changing the law passed down by the ancestors, there will definitely be people who follow the law left by the ancestors, so the outcome of the change is very poor.

Because most of the changes touched the core interests of the ruling class, it was difficult for a few elites and kings to confront the entire ruling class, unless there was a serious external enemy that dealt a heavy blow to the ruling class with vested interests, and the country was on the verge of collapse and the ruling class was seriously damaged. Unable to interfere with the reformers in carrying out reforms, the reformers must also cultivate a new class and maintain the gains of the reforms, so as to ensure that the reforms are not undermined by the old guards.