Love has to be the right door, right? Love really needs to be a door to door match, right?

In principle, it is. Are you comfortable wearing a cloth shoe and a leather shoe? status, culture, economy, politics. It's not okay to have that kind of dissonance, and that's the case in our society.

Pareto optimality refers to a state of resource allocation that makes it impossible to make the situation of some people better without making it worse for anyone. Pareto improvement is a change that makes at least one person better without making anyone worse. On the one hand, Pareto optimality refers to a state in which there is no room for Pareto improvement; On the other hand, Pareto improvement is the path and method to achieve Pareto optimality.

Pareto optimum is the "ideal kingdom" of fairness and efficiency.

The final result of love is marriage, and marriage is equivalent to a reorganization and reallocation of resources. Specifically, you can see the cited references, which have detailed explanations.

This is China's view 1000 years ago, and many old people also see it this way The right person is a formal marriage, not a real love marriage, I recommend you to watch a movie "Notting Hill", and you can be together if you don't have the right door

Not necessarily, but there must be an intersection of habits, habits, interests, etc., otherwise it will be very depressing.

Love doesn't need to be needed for marriage.

Big mistake, feudal thinking.

In most cases, this is the case, society is like this, there is no way.

Unconditional and loyal love may only appear in Qiong Yao**. The current society is too realistic, and it can only be said that way.

How to find the right love you want.

In people's impressions, love is the most romantic and beautiful, and it is otherworldly. ......However, from a practical point of view, there are some things that seem to be cheesy in love, which are actually very true. ......Specifically, the three truths that love cannot be eaten, love must be the right person, and love must have a sufficient material foundation are very vulgar but correct.

1. Love can't be eaten.

When we talk about the beauty and romance of love, we often describe it as a state of not eating the fireworks of the world. ......But in fact, love really can't be eaten. ......If you only talk about love and ignore everything else, this kind of love cannot last long.

In fact, in the process of pursuing love, we must pay attention to the reality of life, so that this kind of love can last for a long time.

2. Love should be the right one.

When it comes to the right door, many people think that it is a wrong concept of hole matching. ......But in fact, love really needs to be the right person. ......If the gap between the family conditions of the two parties in love is too large, there will be a lack of common language between each other, and there will even be many conflicts, which will cause problems in this love.

Only between two people whose family conditions are not big can there be a view of common benefits and similar benefits, and the love between the two parties can be maintained for a long time.

3. Love must be accepted to mean that there must be a sufficient material foundation.

When it comes to love, many people will look at it purely from an emotional point of view. If you mention the material base, it will feel too cheesy. ......But in fact, if love lacks a material foundation, it will lack the conditions for long-term maintenance, and two people can't even guarantee their lives, so how can they talk about ......loveAlthough the above aspects may seem tacky, they are really right.

In the absence of love, we must act according to these principles in order to obtain true love.