What kind of legal responsibilities will this student bear?

1. The crime of tax evasion refers to the behavior of a taxpayer who deliberately adopts deception or concealment to make a false tax declaration or fails to declare for the purpose of illegal possession, and evades the payment of a relatively large amount of tax and accounts for more than 10% of the tax payable, as well as the behavior of a withholding agent who adopts the above means to not pay or underpay the tax collected, and the amount is relatively large.

The law does not specify how much the amount is larger, but it is generally not less than 50,000 yuan.

2. The amount of remuneration of ordinary teachers will not be very large, and the amount of tax payable will not be very large, so it should only constitute tax evasion. It is estimated that it will be an administrative responsibility, and he will be ordered to pay back taxes and impose corresponding administrative penalties.

3. At present, the first person in Chengdu to "evade taxes", evading more than 100,000 taxes, only paid back taxes and was exempted from criminal punishment.

4. Even if the student knows, he does not bear any criminal liability under normal circumstances, at most administrative responsibility, and it is relatively minor. If you don't know, you can't talk about taking responsibility!

This knowledge is very important in determining guilt and innocence.

The subjective aspect of the crime of tax evasion is manifested as direct intent, and if the student is not guilty, he is accomplice if he knows.

Knowing or not is precisely the key to conviction, and if knowingly assisting, it is an accomplice; Not knowing is a tool, not responsible.

Because the amount of remuneration is usually not very large, the associate professor's actions are only an administrative offense – a form of tax evasion. As a result, the penalties faced by the associate professor are generally ordered to pay back taxes and late fees.

As for the student, whether he knows it or not, it is generally not dealt with.

We cannot confuse administrative offences with criminal offences. This case falls under the category of administrative violations.

In addition to the responsibility of laws and regulations, the organizer of the accident is also riddled with other troubles, and the classmates or family members who have had the accident will tear their faces and make trouble. Therefore, more is better than less, and the group leaders who are keen to call on the organization of gatherings can have a little more heart, lest you regret it and cry without tears!

You need to take some responsibility for this, so try not to organize this kind of activity privately.

1. If there are for-profit ingredients in it, no form can be exempted.

2. Non-profit gatherings can be exempted if there is a waiver signed by both parties.

You need to take responsibility, but you just try to avoid it.

Schoolmate... You're thinking so sound...

Hello, I received your request for help, and I will answer your questions.

According to your question, I think that the group owner is not obliged to take responsibility, because they are not a legal relationship, so there are generally no legal rights and obligations, of course, if the group owner knows that this or that danger will occur, and still organizes activities, he is at fault and has to be held responsible.

In some cases, there is a need to take responsibility, but the obligation of the organizer to protect the safety of the participants and rescue the participants is very low, and it is often only a specific duty to act. If the mountaineering organizer has an obligation to rescue members when they are in distress, otherwise it constitutes the crime of intentional injury or intentional homicide with less serious circumstances.

In the vast majority of cases, there is no liability. The situation you envision will hardly be held accountable. But life is complicated. This should be analyzed in conjunction with the specific situation.

Correct several erroneous views.

1. There is no distinction between the law of results and the law of conduct. Nothing in China is a result method.

2. It is not only for profit that organizes activities for the purpose of making a profit.

The organizer is not legally responsible, and the general traffic accident is a tort, and the victim should pursue the driver's tort legal responsibility.

If you go to see Andy Lau's concert and have a traffic accident, will Andy Lau also be responsible?

If you want to avoid this, the organizers have to make a statement in advance.

There should be none, and it is necessary to solve specific things on a case-by-case basis.

If your brother's right to health is harmed, the other party should compensate for part of the medical expenses, and the school should also conduct an investigation, give a true explanation, and bear the corresponding responsibility. Communicate with the other parent and the school first, and if the other party does not bear the responsibility, you can file a civil lawsuit with the local court and claim compensation in accordance with the law.

If a person is injured by negligence, he must bear civil liability. A civil lawsuit may be filed for financial compensation. You can consult a local lawyer for details.

And the schools are partly responsible.

Hello, did the victim have any injuries evaluated? How old are the students? If the injury is minor, it will be punished according to the violation of the Public Security Administration Law, and if it is more than a minor injury, it will constitute a criminal offense, depending on the age of the student who stabbed the person.

Indemnification.

Criminal liability for serious injuries such as injuries.

Condemned by society.

The victim's injuries you mentioned should not meet the standard of minor injuries, and your child does not need to bear criminal liability, but there may be civil liability.

You are not directly responsible, such as car accidents, food poisoning have direct perpetrators, and it is very easy to find the perpetrator, the disappearance of personnel is also directly related to the missing person himself, you will not bear the main responsibility, but as an organizer, you have to fulfill the responsibility of proper organization to avoid accidents as much as possible. If something happens, you will definitely be jointly and severally liable.

In this case, you are an act of friendship, and you are not liable if you are not at fault, but you have the obligation to actively rescue, and the damage caused by this should be borne by the tortfeasor.

You have to explain the transportation routes, the food, the accidents that may happen, whether there are dangers, and so on, and if they don't object, then it's all right.

In the event of a personal injury or other sudden accident, if you have no obvious fault in the organization and activities, and in addition, in the course of the accident, you have fulfilled your responsibilities and obligations, such as active rescue, timely reporting to the police, and taking timely and effective relevant measures to prevent the expansion of the situation, your legal liability can generally be excluded.

In addition, even if you have a written waiver agreement, you will still be liable if you fail to fulfill your responsibilities and obligations in the event of an accident.

It's better to agree in advance, otherwise you will have to bear some responsibility, after all, you are the organizer.

Classmates! Just help!