Do you have any good skills and methods for writing for the exam?

Introduction. For doctoral students studying humanities and sociology in any discipline, whether or not you can obtain a doctorate, 30% or more depends on the quality of your ** writing; From how to conceive and draft the priest, to writing, revising, and polishing; In the process of writing a doctorate, your research ideas, hard work and the guidance level of your supervisor cannot be ignored, but more importantly, it is the cultivation of writing level and thinking ability, and the writing level and thinking ability complement each other.

This book provides a systematic and comprehensive approach to the entire process of writing a Ph.D., from the initial ideation stage to the successful completion and publication of the Ph.D. program.

The author of this book, Professor Patrick Dunleavy and a veteran PhD supervisor and academic author, emphasises the importance of academics first. If you grasp these principles, you can easily cope with the various decisions that every author has to make and the dilemmas that they have to face. At the same time, he offers a wealth of practical advice and tips that you can apply flexibly to your own research needs and personal principles.

This book is not a ready-made manual for solutions, but reading it will help you expand your thinking and take on the challenge of creating.

**Writing Skills:1. Before writing.

1. Know how to state the argument in the failed introduction.

2. Use the remaining part of ** to state the reasons and evidence so that the argument is fully supported.

3. Consider the order in which you want to present them: how to structure the paragraphs is the clearest and most convincing.

Second, the first structural arrangement skills.

1. Similar ideas should usually be clustered together, not scattered.

2. Each paragraph should have a difference in font, such as indenting or leaving extra line spacing between paragraphs.

3. Only one main point should be stated in each paragraph.

4. Each paragraph can be regarded as a short essay.

Start with a topic sentence that introduces the main points of the paragraph;

Explain this point further;

Provide appropriate evidence for opinions;

interpreting or dissecting leakage evidence;

Summarize the main points and point out how they relate to the overall argument.

5. Each paragraph should be connected to the next paragraph using transition words or phrases.

6. The order of paragraphs should be logical and consistent.

7. Once you have written the first draft, try to summarize the main points of each paragraph in one sentence.

Ph.D. work is undoubtedly an important part of doctoral education. **Quality is a sign of doctoral students' research ability and academic level, and there is no low level of Ph.D. students who become excellent researchers in the future.

1) What is the point of innovation. ** Clearly state the new discoveries, hypotheses and theories proposed, and define the connotation and extension of the corresponding concepts and variables;

2) Why is this innovation proposed? **It is necessary to explain the practical or theoretical background of the innovative point, not only to convince yourself but also to make the reader feel that such an innovative point is indeed of academic and practical significance, and it is worth spending energy to study;

3) Answer the question of whether this innovation is valid. Present evidence and arguments to support the innovative point of **. In order to answer the above questions, there are three aspects, namely, the expression of innovation points, the theoretical and practical background review of innovation points, and the demonstration of innovation points.

The expression reflects the contribution of **, the background comment sets off the value of **, and the argument shows the credibility of the innovation point, all three of which are indispensable. It is difficult for readers to understand the weight of their innovation and the value of the author's work, and valuable hypotheses or theories need to be supported by sufficient arguments, otherwise readers will be incredulous and cannot confidently cite them.