Who is better in Nash or Paul s passing, and what is their respective style?

Personally, I think Paul has a good breakout and assists, and he is also very good at steals, but Nash is a little bit more experienced, but he's older, and he's not as flexible as he was when he was younger, so I think Paul is going to be a little bit better, personally, purely personally, I like Paul a little bit more. Support Paul also supports Nash.

First, Paul and Nash are both playmaking guards, playing the No. 1 position, and have always been core point guards with the concept of assists;

Second, Paul has 4 assists in his career, averaged assists per game in his NBA career, and the highest number of assists per game in a single game was 21 (November 7, 2007 against the Lakers), and won 0 MVPs;

Third, Nash has 5 career assists king, NBA career average assists per game, the highest number of assists per game in a single game is 23 (April 29, 2007 against the Lakers), and 1 MVP;

Fourth, Paul is a rigorous, accurate, agile, unpretentious, and well-grounded playmaker; And Nash is an elegant, accurate, fickle, gorgeous, ornamental playmaker, he is known for a trick of horseback archery, for example, Paul is like a serious and hard-working student, a bit of a nerd, but in terms of assists, don't spray, Nash is a student who excels in learning, colleagues basketball, KTV and other aspects are outstanding.

Fifth, Nash has retired, Paul still continues, two great NBA playmaking guards, salute them!

Paul has all the makings of a good playmaker, shooting consistently in key moments and stealing without losing his defensive position. At the same time, Paul has an excellent big-picture vision and a wide passing vision. Paul will keep the ball in his hands for long periods of time, making sure every pass is accurate and effective, and keeping the turnover rate to a very low level.

Defensively, Paul is extremely fast, good at steals, and has a great rebounding rate, and Paul's one-on-one ability should not be underestimated. Paul is very good at changing speed when he is in possession and creating space for step-back jumpers.

Nash's long pass accurately judged the position of the fast player's run, and then accurately put it into place. There is no need for any adjustments, and the receiver goes straight to a dunk or layup. Undoubted masterclass passing.

Very good at passing the ball like a needle, as long as there is a slight possibility, Nash is sure to pass in place. He is proficient in almost all kinds of passing, including very difficult balls. There wasn't much of a passing angle, and Nash reacted entirely on the chemistry between himself and his teammates.

The rhythm is very good, and the receiver will be very comfortable. Rhythm is very important for a pitcher, and Nash's passing seems to invisibly lead the rhythm of the receiver, in place - catch the ball - jump - shoot, the whole action is done in one go, very comfortable.

Relatively speaking, I personally feel that Paul is more stable, better attacking, better physical fitness, and more well-rounded overall.

Nash's biggest feature is that he has a lot of assists after blocking and pick-and-roll. Down, dunk, Paul's assist, after breaking through the ball, has a wide field of view, and the person who holds the ball is comfortable.

First of all, Paul's individual singles ability is better than Nash's, and Nash's speed has an advantage over Paul.

Third, the two are between the two in terms of organizing the offense, but the difference between the two is that Paul has more tricks in assists, Nash's speed is sharper in assists, and he often completes seemingly impossible passes from time to time, and needs more tacit understanding between teammates, while Paul can often rely on his excellent single ability to complete the shot after losing the opportunity to assist, which Paul beats Nash, the two of them are different types of assisters, and the fast-paced offensive mode is the first to push Nash.

Nash and Paul are both traditional guards, their passes are similar in many places, Paul's assists and his passing and dribbling feints are a lot, compared to the old saying that Nash's feints are less, and Nash's passing is more stealthy and creative than Paul's, Nash's passes are usually very bold and very good to watch, of course, Paul's ball is also very ornamental and creative, but in comparison, Nash's is better, Nash's passing is very imaginative.

1 Name: Christopher Emmanuel Paul.

Birthday: May 6, 1985 Sports Team: Los Angeles Clippers.

Profile: Chris Paul was born on May 6, 1985 in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Paul's assists prefer to give inside air relays, such as to Griffin, Jordan Jr., and suddenly throw the ball up in the breakaway, a relay.

2 Name: Steve John Nash.

Date of birth: February 7, 1974 Sports Team: Retired

Profile: Steve Nash, born February 7, 1974 in Johannesburg, South Africa, is a former Canadian professional basketball player who plays as a point guard.

Nash prefers to thread the needle, such as blocking and dismantling at the three-point line on the inside, and dismantling it after blocking, Nash makes a beautiful pass to the ground, and Standmeier dunks when he receives the ball.

Nash's biggest characteristic is that he passes the ball to players who have hot hands and doesn't believe it to watch the game.

And Paul's abruptness is also very distinctive.

It's all perfect PG, Nash's passing between the lines is even better, the name of the Son of the Wind is not called in vain, and the ball is extremely comfortable, there is a joke: even the 60-year-old man can score 10 points in a game with Nash. Paul's assists are not as good as Nash's.

Paul's general positional battles bypass the defense, and the air is in the air, and Nash is generally his own breakthrough ball, and Nash's points are better.

Both of them are point guards with extremely strong scoring ability.