The old lady has been listed for stealing ribs many times, why would the old lady s family rather be

It may be that there is no money, or it may be that you don't need to give money to hang a sign. In fact, this is not right, since the ribs are stolen, it is best to hand them over to the ** to deal with, if you show it to the public, even if you agree, it is also immoral, it is not advisable to trample on the dignity of others, and it will encourage the arrogance of people who don't care about dignity to steal.

Because the old lady's family has no money, in front of money, dignity and face can be completely ignored, so the impact of listing on them is also minimal.

Because the old lady's family doesn't particularly care about the old lady, they are relatively indifferent to the old lady.

Because they love to be cheap, they feel that they will lose that money if they pay the fine, and they regard money as too important.

In Foshan, an old lady was caught by the supermarket for stealing ribs in the supermarket many times, because the old lady and her family refused to pay the fine, they even agreed to the supermarket to display it to the public, perhaps because the old lady's family was relatively poor and could not afford to buy meat, but in any case could not steal other people's things.

An old man was shopping at the supermarket and secretly hid the pork at the checkout. According to the clerk, it was the third time that the old man had stolen something in the supermarket, the first time he could be forgiven, the second time he could tolerate it, and the third time he couldn't bear it. The clerk called the police, and the old man's family was not particularly reasonable, and did not accept the fine or apologize.

The clerk had no way to make such a decision, so the old man hung up the sign "The thief steals for the third time".

It is said that the old man's family is not poor, and she has no mental problems, but she likes to take advantage of small advantages. Some people think that the store's approach to the elderly is too much, and the elderly should not be allowed to wear that kind of brand. But isn't the store aggrieved?

When someone steals something, you can't be dumb and eat coptis, right? The store also wants to put an end to this kind of behavior of the elderly, and it is inappropriate for the elderly to hang up the signs, but the practices of the elderly and their families are even more inappropriate.

People of the age group like the old man must have had too many hard days in the past, which made them develop the habit of taking advantage of small advantages。Although the conditions are better now, that habit is not easy to break. The clerk also said that the store often encountered old people who stole things, and some of the elderly's children drove luxury cars to pick her up, not because the family was poor, but because they had developed the habit of taking advantage.

If you encounter this kind of old man who steals things, most merchants really don't know what to do. If the police are called, the police can only educate them. I can only tell their children that if they are reasonable and reasonable, they can let them talk to the old man.

If you meet an unreasonable child, it is really a dumb person who eats Coptis chinensis - there is bitterness and I can't say it.

Some netizens once ridiculed that "bad guys are getting old", and it is really helpless to face some unvirtuous old people. We have always followed the traditional virtue of respecting the elderly, but when we encounter those elderly people who are not moral themselves, do we still need to respect them? At the very least, there should be a minimum of courtesy, but it must not be tolerated or connived.

I think it's a mental problem, and that's the truth when they say they're confused. He is old and confused, and hopes that his son will take him back to educate him.

It's not that you're too poor or have mental problems, and the elderly may like to steal in this way and have developed the habit of taking advantage.

Personally, I feel that there is a mental problem, and at the same time, there are bad habits and behaviors. In modern society, there is so much material abundance, so it is not so poor. There are also repeated repeat offenders, and such people should be detained for a few days.

It's not poor, and the spirit is no problem, it's love to be cheap! The old lady stole three times together, she and her family did not accept the fine, the supermarket, the old lady herself, the old lady's family, the tripartite negotiation to show the public, would rather lose face than spend money, this character is rare!

I think this old man is morally corrupt, because this is not the first time she has stolen something, she is a repeat offender.

Neither, the older generation has experienced hardships and understands that life is not easy. But if you do this kind of behavior, you can't understand it, if you are a child, communicate with your parents more, and communication is the way to solve anything.

The old man just likes to take advantage of small advantages, because people of this age like the old man have had too many hard lives in the past, and they have developed the habit of taking advantage of small advantages.

The handling of this incident shows that there are still some problems in society that deserve reflection. The first is that the problem of crimes committed by the elderly is not addressed; The second is that the family members have a tough attitude and are not dealt with; the third is to condone the supermarket illegally; Fourth, the problem is handled perfunctorily.

We firmly disagree with this kind of humiliating situation, and now is the era of the rule of law in the 21st century, and no one is allowed to abuse "lynching" under any pretext. Moreover, this is no longer the feudal era of human rights, and everyone's human rights should be respected. Crimes committed should be dealt with in accordance with the relevant criminal law, even in the most heinous cases of death rows, and this degrading approach should not be used.

** There is a major fault in the way of dealing with it, and if such a thing happens, the family of the elderly should be compulsorily compensated and fined, not in this way. Strongly disagree!

According to the person in charge of the supermarket, the old man paid for some of the goods, but stole a pack of ribs. The supermarket also said that this is not the first time, and the elderly often come to the supermarket to steal things, and they have been caught twice before.

And there are often elderly people in supermarkets who come to steal things, and at most 4 are caught a day, all of which are committed by old people. It's not that these old people don't have money to buy things, but they are deliberately greedy for small gains, and they can't do the supermarket business if they continue to develop. Once, after an elderly man stole pork, his son drove a BMW to pick him up, and said, "My mother just likes to be cheap, I usually give her a lot of money to buy vegetables, and she said that pork is very expensive."

The supermarket was also very helpless, after catching the old man this time, the person in charge of the supermarket also called the police, but ** only gave the old man a verbal education, and the old man's family refused to fine. The supermarket had no choice but to make this decision, and listed the old man who stole the ribs to show the public, writing "Thief, steal for the third time!" "However, the consent of the elderly man and his family was obtained in advance.

However, the main cause of the incident is the improper handling of **.

First, in China, although there are relevant criminal law provisions, people over the age of 75 can be punished lightly if they commit crimes. However, when dealing with incidents similar to the elderly, almost all of them are verbal education, and then release them, which is to nourish the elderly criminals in disguise.

In fact, many times some elderly people are not even 75 years old, and the criminal law only provides for a lighter punishment, not no punishment, and the act of stealing ribs in a supermarket has constituted theft and can be charged with sentencing. It's just that some policemen are afraid of small things and are afraid of trouble and don't want to waste time!

Third, was ** still at the scene at the time of the incident? Why is this happening if it is in the field? If you weren't at the scene, why did you leave first when the two parties hadn't reached a settlement?

In response to the incident, it is recommended to deal with it separately, and the elderly have violated the law, so they can deal with it as they should be. If the family members insist on refusing to cooperate, coercive measures will be taken. However, the illegal behavior of supermarkets should also be dealt with. At the same time, the derelict police should be investigated!

I think the supermarket is doing a very reasonable thing. First of all, this is the fault of the old people, and they will be punished if they refuse to take responsibility.

Good job! It is not right for the elderly to steal ribs for any reason, and the family has the responsibility to help the elderly compensate. Since he refuses, he bears the responsibility of not making compensation. The supermarket is simply a trick, and this kind of person should be cured.

I feel that the old man is also a habitual offender, and the family also has a certain responsibility, but the supermarket listing company is also a bit too much. You can call 110 directly, and it's better not to do it in the supermarket.

Listing in public is supposed to be an act of trampling on the rule of law and human rights, which is immoral, and the elderly should be responsible for their own actions, they can compensate for their losses, and the supermarket can also be handed over to the police.

The elderly are more important to money, they are already a lot old, and they do not particularly value dignity. Therefore, the relevant response measures should be changed, otherwise, it will be difficult to prevent and treat such a situation.

For the poor, who can't even afford to eat, money is indeed more important than dignity. Without money, even their lives are a problem.

Money and dignity are as important as the scales. The old lady's approach only takes money too seriously, which also leads to the balance of the scales.

Yes for her, because the old lady is very short of money, and for money, she can endure the shame of being listed in public, and she does not need dignity.

Dignity is not as important as that, when the money is gone, you can earn it again, and dignity is trampled on by others is the biggest challenge to people's bottom line.

After the news came out, many people were debating whether the supermarket behaved properly. In fact, there is no need to argue about this at all, and the behavior of the supermarket is a typical illegal act in the law, because the supermarket is not a law enforcement agency and has no law enforcement power. But few people noticed why the old lady's family behaved like this?

2. There are a variety of reasons for family members to engage in such acts1. The family member who made the decision is the daughter-in-law

2. Give the old lady a lessonIn fact, the old lady's family is very good and she is not short of money, but the old lady likes to go to the supermarket to steal things, and she has said many times that she has not changed this habit, and it may be that after she gets older, people begin to make mistakes, so the family will make this decision, in this way to give the old lady a profound lesson, so that the old lady can completely get rid of this bad habit.

Because her family was unwilling to accept the fine, the supermarket had no choice, and finally with the consent of the old lady and her family, the "thief, steal for the third time" was displayed to the public. I think there are two possibilities for why the family agrees to display the plaque and not accept the fine, one is that the family is shameless, and the other is that they are disappointed in the old lady and don't want to care about her.

This old lady has stolen things many times, it may be that the old man likes to be greedy for small gains, or it may be because of family difficulties, and he wants to reduce the financial pressure on the family in this way, and the family agrees to show the public, or it may be that the daughter-in-law has seen many times of communication to no avail, and wants to give the old man a warning in this way, so that the old man should not continue this behavior. But when I saw the image of the old man's daughter-in-law in the news, I was a little helpless, and at the same time I felt sad and sympathetic to the old man.

In order not to lose the money of the merchant in the past, the family agreed that the merchant would show the old lady to the public, and the old man should have the responsibility to help his mother when he is old and confused.

The family did not agree to the fine. The old lady's behavior of stealing ribs was wrong, and when the police asked for a fine, the family refused, so after the consent of the parties, there was a sign for public display.

The family may also know about the old man's habit, I think it should be dissuaded many times without success, so I can only let the old man do it, although I think the family is not doing it right, but I can understand them.

Because the family also knows that this kind of behavior is wrong and will have a bad impact on the society, but as a child, they can't persuade the old lady, so they can only agree to the merchant to show the public, hoping to stop the old lady through this method.

Because the old lady was caught stealing ribs many times, the supermarket staff also asked for compensation, after the negotiation failed, the supermarket staff hoped that the old lady could apologize, I thought the old lady would refuse and compensate, but I didn't expect the old lady to agree.

The family also wants the old lady to stop stealing ribs, the family discourages rudeness, and wants to use the power of the public to make the old lady change this bad behavior.

Because this kind of thing came out, the old lady's family had no choice, and the theft was punished, and the old lady's family didn't want to pay the fine, so they agreed to let the old lady "show the public".

This incident was the police persuaded the family not to accept the fine after the education, and was willing to put up a display to warn the thief. In their eyes, they may really feel that dignity is not as important as fines, and if dignity is important, they will not steal ribs many times.

I think dignity is more important. The family's actions are unreasonable, and since they are wrong, they should pay a fine. Let the elderly know that this is a bad behavior, and then spend more time with the elderly.

In my opinion, dignity comes and goes, when I was a student, I would not blink an eye when I went to the Internet to spend two or three hundred at a time, but now that I have a family, I will bargain with my aunt when buying groceries, and I have learned to be a scoundrel who I once did not have.

When I was a hot-blooded youth, I had the ability to gain dignity on my own; When I am old and frail, I can only rely on my young children to defend my dignity. How sad it is to throw away the dignity of the elderly as a child. In 30 years' time, you will be old and decrepit, and who will defend your dignity then?

I don't know if she's pitiful or pathetic, just from her many times stealing, you can see that she doesn't care about dignity, and then she is listed in public, this kind of personality, and she may continue to steal in the future.

Judging from the fact that the elderly and their families agreed to the store to display it to the public, it is clear that in their eyes, fines are more important than dignity. In addition, in the eyes of the family, the dignity of the elderly can be dispensed without, but the fine must not be paid.