Netizens called the police to the bad review Goubuli Bun Shop, what is the response of the party?

I checked the incident is a food evaluator selected Goubuli bun shop, after that, the review was posted on the Internet, I think this kind of evaluator as a public figure, without communicating with the store, posted unfavorable remarks to the store on the Internet, should be held responsible, after calling the police, the party's response is true, ** did not contact him.

The party is a ** blogger of food evaluation, after the dog ignores the bun shop and calls the police, he said that what he said is true and not exaggerated, he is doing evaluation, and he has a bad experience to say it, which is an attitude.

The party responded that the sauce meat bun was particularly greasy and did not use real materials; The pork bun has thick skin and less filling, and the dough is sticky to the teeth. This kind of quality is about 20 yuan, 100 yuan is a bit expensive for two drawers, and Goubuli buns are indeed a bit expensive.

The response of the party was that the evaluation he made about the buns was serious, the sentences were true, and there was no exaggeration.

I feel that I am embarrassing myself, maliciously smearing my bun façade and disturbing my business.

Goubuli bad reviews call the police, no matter what brand it is, it is impossible to satisfy everyone, and it is true that there are big brands that are getting worse and worse, so consumers also have the right to demand quality.

Netizens think that this dog ignores the bun shop is really unreasonable, let's mess around. What was supposed to be a small matter would alarm the police.

Isn't this a typical thief shouting to catch a thief, the problem of his own store has to be transferred to others, saying that others give malicious bad reviews, and netizens' eyes should be bright.

If you get a bad review, you will call the police, if there is no problem with the bun, will someone maliciously give a bad review? I blame others for having a problem with my bun, I'm really speechless.

This store is also amazing. Their own products are poor, and consumers are not allowed to tell the truth.

This kind of complaining behavior is normal, after all, it is people who try it themselves and feel their own feelings. However, Goubuli Bun Shop is not happy, Goubuli Bun Shop also issued a statement, saying that the blogger was slandering them and had called the police to deal with it. The statement that the dog ignores the buns has caused a lot of netizens to complain, why, it's not delicious.

03. As a consumer, do you have the right to comment on the unpalatable? Yes, even if others think it is delicious, but consumers themselves find it unpalatable, it is also subjectively evaluated. As long as it makes sense, it's not nonsense.

Moreover, if you open the door to do business, if you can't accept bad reviews, you shouldn't do it. Consumers spend money to eat, so they naturally have the right to evaluate.

The store itself has a poor evaluation, and this time it has pulled itself to the cusp of style, and now it is no longer complained by consumers who have eaten their store, but by netizens on the whole network, and it is estimated that it is not far from closing.

That's right, everyone has the right to rate the taste of a food store, and if it's delicious, there are no bad reviews.

The evaluation of netizens must be correct, Goubuli Baozi boss called the police to protect the reputation of his store, but in fact, the Weibo blogger recorded and evaluated his dining feelings, which is a person's rights and freedoms, not malicious slander and slander.

I don't think there's anything wrong with that, consumers have the right to make this evaluation, as long as you don't feel good, you can give a bad review.

Goubuli Baozi said in the statement that he would call the police to deal with it, and the reason why I said this is that they didn't think about how to deal with this matter, so they hurriedly issued a statement, which can be said to be a relatively failed public relations. Goubuli has a century-old brand, many people know this brand, even under the current trend of the times, these century-old brands still have a place, but for some consumer evaluations, some brands will accept these opinions, while others will be-for-tat. Why is the hundred-year-old dog ignoring buns evaluated by netizens as unpalatable?

Is this a true testimonial? I believe that many partners who have never eaten want to know about it.

Recently, a netizen went to Goubuli Bun Wangfujing Main Store to eat steamed buns, and then began to evaluate the steamed buns, we can see that the man in ** spent 60 yuan to buy eight steamed buns with sauce meat, and then spent 38 yuan to buy eight pork buns, and then netizens gave comments on these steamed buns, he felt that the steamed buns with sauce meat were more greasy, and he didn't use good materials. And the skin of the pork bun is very thick, there is not much filling, and there is a feeling of sticky teeth when eating. After that, the man said that if you want to say how unpalatable it is, it won't be enough, but it's about the same as the more than 20 yuan outside, and the two drawers of buns cost 100 yuan a bit expensive.

The merchant's response attracted the attention of many netizens**After it was issued, Goubuli Baozi quickly registered on the official Weibo and released a statement on the Internet, saying that the publisher of ** had violated the reputation of their restaurant, and then the restaurant would investigate the legal responsibility of the relevant personnel, and also claimed to report to the police. After this statement was issued, there was a very heated discussion on the Internet, because in **, we can see that it is just a real evaluation of this restaurant after experiencing it, and this evaluation is the same as the evaluation we used to go to the platform after eating. The comments about the unpalatable taste of this restaurant are not only said by this netizen.

We can see that the online score of this restaurant is only a few points of 2.00 points. <>

Why can't a century-old brand store accept the evaluation of others In fact, for merchants, there are some problems of mentality, and for a century-old store, it must be able to withstand the test of consumers. Since there are different voices coming out, why not think about how you can improve it. For every consumer, they are qualified to evaluate the service they have experienced and the food they have eaten, no matter what kind of evaluation is made, as long as it is not a malicious evaluation, these are all that need to be carried out by the merchant, if there is indeed such a problem in the store, then it must be changed in time.

This is how a brand can develop for a long time, and then it didn't take long for Goubuli to find out that it was wrong to do so, and then he deleted this statement, and also canceled the official one, but what has been done has been done, and there is no way to make up for it. <>

Goubuli buns are a century-old shop, and some netizens said that his buns are not worth the price, and this shop feels that ordinary people are not qualified to say that this store is not good, so he chose a tough way - call the police to solve this matter, and want to shut up those netizens who have bad reviews in this way.

Because Goubuli Bun Shop thinks that the netizen posted ** on the Internet, which has caused widespread attention on their reputation, and feels that the netizen has violated their reputation, so they chose to call the police.

Goubuli Bun Shop is already a time-honored brand that has operated many stores, and it can't stand the bad reviews from netizens, thinking that its own store is not as bad as they say, so it chooses to call the police.

I think someone should have commented badly about their store and infringed on their rights and interests, so I chose to call the police.

After the Goubuli Bun Shop Wangfujing Store issued a statement, it was quickly condemned by netizens, netizens said that it was wrong to tell the truth now, and later** TV station also directly criticized the Goubuli Bun Shop Wangfujing Store by name, hoping that the century-old store would not "rely on the old and sell the old", and the group headquarters of the Goubuli Bun Shop also issued a statement on the same day announcing that it would stop cooperating with the Goubuli Bun Shop Wangfujing Store, after this statement was released, netizens said that the Goubuli Bun Shop Group Headquarters was in " Broken arm self-protection".

It was a live broadcast of eating and broadcasting to go to the Tianjin branch of Goubuli to try it, he bluntly said that the bun was unpalatable and expensive, and gave a bad review, and then the merchant threatened to call the police, but the fact was not reported.

Some Internet celebrities commented on the Internet that Goubuli's buns were expensive and unpalatable, and Goubuli issued a statement saying that he would call the police.

Because netizens thought that Gou's bad service attitude was not good, they gave a bad review, and the bun shop believed that it violated its right to reputation.

The netizen ate the steamed buns at the Goubuli steamed bun shop and gave a bad review to the steamed buns, but was beaten by the staff of the Goubuli steamed bun shop, so he called the police.

I think it's true. Everyone's taste is deviated, the blogger just published his evaluation of food, we usually eat out of the good and bad, come across the delicious will praise, the bad will definitely complain, because the bad review will call the police, it is a little difficult to accept.

The negative comments from netizens just represent his personal taste, he just thinks it is not delicious and expensive. On the contrary, it is difficult to understand the practice of the merchant, and the merchant should reflect on the problem of his product at the first time and should not choose to call the police, which is a bit vexatious and exaggerates the matter.

It's true, I haven't tasted his steamed buns, how can I know the taste. People's living standards are getting higher and higher, and they also have their own opinions about food requirements. If it doesn't suit your taste, you can give comments or suggestions. Merchants can improve according to the tastes of most of their customers.

The negative reviews of netizens are true, and they are purely the personal feelings of consumers. Many customers who ignore the buns have responded that the buns have thick skin and small filling, and the more they make them, the more they draw them! The response has not improved many times.

It's true, people who are familiar with the local area know that the filling in the bun is too greasy, the taste is very bad, and the waiter's attitude is very poor, ** expensive is not worth going.

It may be really not delicious, so netizens have a bad review. The store also called the police, which was indeed too much.

The negative reviews from netizens are true. The quality of the Goubuli bun made the experience of netizens very unpleasant.

The negative reviews from netizens are true. There is no need for netizens to smear the dog and ignore the buns, and many people think that the dogs ignore the buns and they are not delicious.

The negative comments of netizens are true, probably because the dog ignores the buns and is unappetizing.

It's a real bun that the dog ignores, and it's really not as big and delicious as the reputation.

Just like Jia San buns are very famous, I have eaten them, and I don't think they are very delicious. And it's a bit greasy!

In today's rapid development of the Internet economy, traditional snacks have been greatly impacted, and they need to develop and survive in the change, so as not to be eliminated.