Are new energy vehicles saving money, practical or not?

Are new energy vehicles saving money, practical or not?

With the continuous support of the state for the new energy industry, the new energy vehicle industry has developed rapidly, the number of new energy vehicles is gradually rising, and many consumers have also accepted new energy vehicles. However, some new energy vehicle owners give a statement that new energy vehicles are fuel-efficient but not money-saving after buying new energy vehicles for a few years! Why is that?

New energy vehicles are fuel-efficient.

The reason why new energy vehicles are fuel-efficient is actually because new energy vehicles can reduce fuel consumption, and pure electric vehicles can do not use fuel at all. For consumers, the benefits of fuel economy can also reduce the cost of using a car, for example, a pure electric vehicle only costs about two cents for 1 kilometer, which is 10 times smaller than that of fuel vehicles.

New energy vehicles do not save money.

Although new energy vehicles can reduce fuel consumption, new energy vehicles do not save money, which is not a contradiction. Not saving money is mainly manifested in the following two aspects:

On the one hand, when buying new energy vehicles, the overall ** of the vehicle is high.

This high has a certain relationship with the production cost of the vehicle, especially the power battery pack used in pure electric vehicles, which accounts for more than 70% of the production cost. Therefore, in order to make new energy vehicles start better, the state has implemented incentive policies, that is, to give certain subsidies to new energy vehicles.

On the other hand, the later maintenance** is higher than that of ordinary fuel vehicles.

The reason for the high maintenance is mainly due to the lack of spare parts and the lack of understanding of electric vehicles in the repair shops on the market, which leads to the inconvenience of later maintenance and the high maintenance level.

Secondly, the replacement cost of new energy batteries is higher.

Just said that new energy vehicle batteries account for 40% to 50% of new energy models, so the cost of batteries is quite high, and batteries can be replaced with new batteries for about five years, and the replacement batteries are generally about 50,000. In other words, it costs 10,000 yuan a year for battery wear, which is also relatively expensive in this regard.

Finally, new energy vehicle insurance** will be more expensive than fuel vehicles of the same level.

Because new energy vehicles now enjoy the first subsidy, when buying insurance, we calculate the first to calculate, not the first you buy, but the first before the subsidy, so the purchase of insurance will cost a part of the price.

Today's new energy vehicles are of course very cost-effective. And it's also very practical. However, the endurance of new energy vehicles is relatively short.

I think new energy vehicles are very cost-effective, they have very low charging costs, they are very practical, and they can be purchased.

New energy vehicles are more cost-effective and very practical. Because the current cruising range is relatively long, and the cost of using the car is relatively low.

It is not difficult for us to find that when you buy a new car, you will often use a new energy vehicle to enter your own alternative list, with the proportion of new energy in China's car is getting higher and higher, and environmental protection, energy saving and other words are also attracting a large number of sentimentalists, and people in the purchase of new energy vehicles, often attracted by its economy and comfort, new energy vehicles in the end save money? Practical or not practical?

There is no doubt that in terms of daily travel, the electricity cost of electric vehicles is indeed less than that of oil under the same mileage, and the electricity consumption of electric vehicles is controlled within 15 kilowatt hours and less than 100 kilometers. If there is a home charging pile, the electric car only costs 10 yuan for 100 kilometers, and even the public charging pile is only about 20 yuan. But what about fuel trucks?

With the recent increase in oil prices, whether it is 92 or 95, ** or around, it is also 100 kilometers away. The operating costs of a gasoline vehicle are several times higher than that of an electric vehicle.

In daily travel within the range of range, the energy cost of electric vehicles is indeed much lower than that of gasoline vehicles. Coupled with the ride smoothness of electric vehicles and the intelligence of vehicle systems, it is not surprising that electric vehicles are popular in the market. We can even get a green card directly after buying an electric car.

For many cities with limited licenses, it is also a real solution to our travel troubles, and it is precisely for this reason that many people now buy pure electric vehicles. When we buy a car, thanks to the support of manufacturers and the best policy subsidies, we can reduce the whole vehicle by a large margin.

Electric vehicles are expensive to buy. Although the state has adopted a subsidy policy for new energy vehicles and canceled the purchase tax, based on the cost of power batteries, the purchase of electric vehicles is indeed much more expensive than fuel vehicles. Taking BYD's Dynasty series "Qin" as an example, the difference between the fuel version and the pure electric version is about 70,000, but in addition to the battery, the pure electric version has also improved a lot in terms of power response, interior configuration, and technological intelligence.

The replacement cost of power batteries is high. As a consumable, the performance of the power battery will decline in reverse with the increase of service life. The battery has been used for many years or has an unexpected failure and needs to be replaced and repaired, and tens of thousands of dollars is a lot of money.

New energy vehicles do not save money, we compare with fuel vehicles, etc., take the energy consumption in the cost of the car that we are usually more concerned about, the fuel price of No. 92 is about yuan, according to the size of the fuel tank in about 40 liters, then it takes 232 yuan, according to the comprehensive fuel consumption of 100 kilometers, the average kilometer needs about 6 cents, and new energy vehicles take pure electric vehicles as an example, the battery capacity of pure electric vehicles is 40kwh, and the electricity cost of public charging piles is calculated. In the case of a full charge, it takes 60 yuan, and the average power consumption per kilometer is less than 3 cents.

Furthermore, from the maintenance cost we are concerned about, the new energy vehicle is driven by the three electric vehicles in the structure, so that is to say, the vehicle only needs to be maintained for the three electric systems, and the analysis from the project is much simpler, and naturally the maintenance of the vehicle is much less, and the small maintenance cost of a single fuel vehicle is about 400 yuan, and the new energy vehicle is basically maintained once for about 10,000 kilometers, at most twice a year, and the fuel vehicle is maintained four times a year. It can be seen that the maintenance cost of new energy vehicles is lower than that of fuel vehicles, and new energy vehicles are of course practical from the practicality, after all, the infrastructure is becoming more and more perfect, and the use of vehicles is becoming more and more convenient.

Summary: Through the comprehensive comparison of new energy vehicles and fuel vehicles, the cost of new energy vehicles is still very cost-effective, as a trend of future automobile development, new energy vehicles are environmentally friendly and pollution-free, and low car costs have also become a choice for us when buying a car.

New energy vehicles are very cost-effective, and then they are also particularly practical. Nowadays, many new energy vehicles have a very strong battery life and are very convenient to charge, so it is worth choosing.

It's not very economical, but it's practical, it's convenient to drive this type of car, you have plenty of time to commute to work, and this type of car is convenient to park.

It is indeed more economical, new energy vehicles use electricity, which is more economical, cheaper than gasoline, and is more practical.

Very good, very practical in life, but also special money-saving, and in this way you can also have a good self-driving trip, the battery life is also very good, has been constantly improving the space.

New energy vehicles are not particularly good or cheap, the cost of charging new energy vehicles is relatively high, and new energy vehicles have many disadvantages in winter. New energy vehicles are not particularly practical and money-saving.

I think new energy vehicles are very good, because they are not only environmentally friendly but also energy-saving, which can meet people's great needs; Very practical and very cost-effective.

New energy vehicles are very good, because the price of oil is now stronger, new energy vehicles are more economical, and this side is environmentally friendly.

With the improvement of technology, there are still a lot of people who buy new energy cars now, but after all, the technology has just begun, and it still can't reach that kind of technology.

Which is more cost-effective, new energy vehicles or fuel vehicles? Let's analyze it from the following aspects:

1. Replace the battery**: The most painful thing for electric car owners may be to change the battery.

At present, the lithium batteries carried by new energy vehicles are mainly divided into two categories, one is ternary lithium batteries, and the other is lithium iron phosphate batteries, the ternary battery life is basically 5-8 years or 1000 cycles, and the life of lithium iron phosphate batteries is basically 8-9 years or about 2000 times. The situation of self-paid battery replacement is basically 2 100,000 yuan, and the market is about 1500 yuan kWh and 1300 yuan kWh respectively, so it takes 53 * 1500 = 79000 or 53 * 1300 = 68900 to replace a 53 kWh battery.

2. Use costs: There are several indispensable costs for using a car, such as maintenance, fuel (electricity), etc., from these two aspects, electric vehicles are very advantageous, and they are quite large. However, the range of the tram car limits the driving range, and it cannot be as convenient as the oil car, which can travel long distances, and it can be refueled for a few minutes and then left.

The range anxiety of tram oil trams requires the owner to have a good ability to control the power of the vehicle.

3. Depreciation rate: The depreciation rate of new energy vehicles is high, as we all know, much higher than fuel vehicles, many cars that have driven 10,000 kilometers for a year or two, and sometimes only half or even less than half of the depreciation.

In general, the electric vehicle model within 100,000 yuan, due to the low body itself and small depreciation loss, as long as the annual mileage is guaranteed to be 10,000 km, the cost of use of the car for more than three years will be lower than that of fuel vehicles. However, if it is a model with a price of 100,000 200,000 yuan, the depreciation loss is large, and the annual mileage needs to be guaranteed to be 20,000 km, and the service life of the car is more than six years, so that the cost of the car can be lower than that of fuel vehicles. As for the ** higher electric model, I believe everyone has a number in their hearts.

With the development of new energy technology, new energy vehicles are definitely becoming more and more cost-effective. As for whether the tram is worth buying, it depends on everyone's individual needs.

No matter what type of car it is, it needs to be maintained. The new energy vehicle also has certain discounts in car maintenance, and its maintenance cost is not too high. However, although new energy vehicles can save money, but at present, my new energy technology is not too mature, can not drive on the highway, and when encountering water, it will also affect the car, so new energy vehicles also need to solve these problems.

If it is an old-age scooter, it must be cheaper than 2-40,000 yuan can be bought, the battery is a lead-acid battery, the same as an electric car, a real new energy vehicle, ** to be very high, such as BYD E5, is a pure electric vehicle, the guide price is about 200,000, its prototype is BYD Surui, ** in 7-100,000, it can be seen that the ** of new energy vehicles is still much higher than traditional cars, but the state is subsidized for pure electric vehicles, and the national subsidy + local subsidy is about 70,000 (the subsidy is decreasing year by year), and there is no need to take purchase tax, In this way, it will exceed 100,000, which is relatively high, but with the breakthrough of battery technology and the continuous expansion of the market, the cost of batteries will be diluted, and the recognition of new energy vehicles will be higher and higher. And the cost of later use is low.

Yesterday, I called Didi, and it was a Chang'an new energy car, and the driver kept telling me that electric vehicles save money.

I asked him the first question, how much did the car land? He said that he asked the company to rent, and the total price was about 150,000 yuan.

The second question, how much does the same Changan gasoline car land? He said it was about 90,000.

Well, the problem is out, the price of the car is 60,000 yuan, private cars are generally 10,000 kilometers a year, each kilometer counts you 6 cents, 60,000 I can drive for ten years, you tell me to save money and save in **?

As soon as I said this, the driver didn't come up.

I think that at this stage new energy vehicles are neither cost-effective nor practical.

1. There are parking spaces in the community, but the property in the community is not allowed to set up charging piles privately for safety reasons, and all electric cars can only be charged in designated parking spaces on the ground, and the number of parking spaces is limited, and there is often a phenomenon of queuing for charging. If you charge at the public charging pile outside, you need to walk home, and you have to run back and forth after buying a car, which is really aggrieved.

2. The charging time is too long, it takes about 8 hours to charge for slow charging, and about 70% can be charged in half an hour if fast charging is used. Fast charging speed does open a lot, but fast charging has a great impact on the life of the battery, and you can't always use fast charging. Everyone's commuting time is about the same, and the charging time is relatively overlapping, which causes the charging pile to be more tense.