There s a question I haven t been able to figure out!! I m really depressed, I can t figure it out!!

This question has been asked many times.

Actually, the reason is very simple.

27+2, it doesn't mean anything, these two numbers can't be added together at all. The reason is very simple, what is 27, is the sum of 25 yuan of the actual room fee and the 2 yuan hidden by the waiter. It already contains 2, and adding 2 doesn't make sense.

Correct calculation: the actual room fee is 25 yuan, and the waiter hides 2 yuan, which is a total of 27 yuan; "The remaining 3 yuan was distributed to the three people, and each person was given 1 yuan", 27 + 3 = 30, which is the money paid by the first three people. In this way, there is no contradiction.

The misconception is miscalculation.

Three people went to live in the hotel, 30 yuan a day, the three of them each out of 10 yuan, just that day the hotel discount, only 25 yuan, the boss asked the waiter to return the extra 5 yuan to the three people. The waiter quietly hid 2 yuan and put it in his pocket, and in this way, he returned 3 yuan to the three of them, that is, the hotel where they each spent 9 yuan.

That is, (30-25=5) yuan, the 2 yuan that the waiter hid, and returned 3 yuan to the three of them.

Answer: 25+2+3=30

Two things else. The three people actually paid 9 yuan, a total of 27 yuan, and distributed it into a house price of 25 yuan, a small two 2 yuan, and there was no problem of 30 yuan house price.

If the original house price is 30 yuan, 30 yuan is allocated to the actual house price of 25 yuan, the second child gets 2 yuan, and the check-out guest is 3 yuan.

The misunderstanding is that when the actual cost per person is 9 yuan, 27 yuan includes 2 yuan for the second child, which should be subtracted, and then the house price, rather than adding up to make up the non-existent 30 yuan.

China is still developing, understandably. Since this is the case, then everyone will work hard for the future of the motherland!

I know. 25 plus 3 is 28 pieces.

Plus 2 pieces.

In fact, there is no less.

28 pieces plus 2 pieces is 30 pieces.

So it's a lot!

So it was there that when he said that he would refund them 3 yuan, he led us into a misunderstanding. Target.

The waiter took 2 of the 5 pieces recovered.

Instead of taking 2 out of 10 pieces for 3 people.

So the 2 pieces taken by the waiter should be counted in the back.

The misconception is there. 3x29

Compare the lyrics of some popular songs in China.

There are also cultural differences between China and the West.

After the discount, the room price is 25 yuan.

The waiter took 2 pieces.

In this way, it can be said that the actual opening expenses of the three of them are 25 + 2 = 27 yuan.

Returned 3 yuan, isn't it a total of 30 yuan??

That is, (3 9 = 27) yuan, plus the waiter took 2 yuan, a total of 29 yuan, this place led us into a misunderstanding, 27 yuan including 2 yuan can not be added.

There was no such thing as a quick pay, because they only paid $27.

It's not one person out of 9 yuan, it's one person out (25 + 3) 3 = yuan.

The boss took 25 yuan, and the waiter took 2 yuan. 25+2=3x9

or 30-5 = 3x9-2

No money is gone

That piece is the deposit, in the boss...

Eyebrows: No. 2 is obscured by hair. But I think from being able to see it. I think No. 2's eyebrows look better than No. 1.

Nose: It feels like the two of you are about the same. No. 2 does not rule out light causes. Number 2 looks better. My standard is small and straight, with a narrow nose.

Mouth: No. 2 nasolabial folds are heavier than No. 1. As far as the lips are thick, it cannot be ruled out that No. 2 is due to laughter. Personally, I think No. 2 is good-looking. The teeth cannot be compared because they are not visible because of number 1.

Eyes: Make-up is not excluded. The eyes are beautiful, at least large and round.

Face shape: Personally, I feel that No. 2 looks better than No. 1. The number 2 is a little rounder. And compared to No. 1, it is smaller.

Hair: No. 2 is more fashionable.

Temperament: No. 1 is Wenqing temperament. No. 2 is fashionable.

All in all, I personally feel that No. 2 is better.

But number 2 seems to have makeup. The appearance of No. 1 makeup is unknown and cannot be compared.

So my personal feeling and aesthetic I think No. 2 is good-looking.

Comparatively, No. 2 is slightly better than No. 1.

What's the use of comparing it? Did you build self-confidence or did someone else choose you? It's kind of sad if so! Appearance of this kind of thing is good in green vegetables, and there is no standard.

No. 1 is bookish and angry, and the temperament is something that can't be wiped out even when she is old Such a girl is not easy to get tired of.

- -Isn't it just that you take off your glasses and don't take off your glasses?

Almost the clarity is different and both should be okay.

If you're not mistaken, you should be No. 2 himself, you asked this question last time, and No. 2 is now changing **? Is it interesting to keep asking?

You deliberately took the No. 1 ugly **, compare with you, is it interesting?

No. 2 is you, right? Because No. 1's ** is obviously a screenshot of a group photo found on the Internet, the reason you asked this question is that you lost to No. 1? Do you think you're a bit more in proportion than she is? Objectively speaking, the two are about the same in terms of coordination. . .

No. 1 dress up will be beautiful.

Radish and cabbage have their own love, and there is Xi Shi in the eyes of lovers!

It doesn't feel very symmetrical, No. 1 scholar temperament.

It's okay to see which one looks good, it's with you for a lifetime, not with others.

It seems to be a person, but No. 2 is a new **, and No. 1 is the previous **.

It feels pretty much the same. It seems to be the same person.

It feels like it's the same person, but it seems that No. 2 is clearer.

How does it look like the same person? It seems that 2 is a good coordination.

Don't say it's before and after plastic surgery

The same pixel has only the ratio,

How do I look like the same person.

Isn't this just a person?!

Because w=fs f=mg, w=mgs is the same weight (mA=mB), g is constant, and the vertical support force distance s is the same (the floor height is the same).

Because p=w t A and B do the same work, and B arrives first at the smallest time t, so B's power is large.

If non-p disjunction q is false, then both non-p and q are false, i.e., p is true and q is false.

Therefore, the combination of p and q is false, and the dissolution is true, so choose a

1] About the problem, not showing, violation, under review, submitting, deleting, invalid, etc

One of the questions that many users have recently reported is: Why is my question missing? The answer is: under review, or deleted without review.

2] Because many questions in the know are required to pass the review before they can be launched, so if you have just asked a question and may still be under review, please be patient, Qingshan will refresh it a few times to see. If the question has not been shown for a long time, it is likely that the question has been removed for breach of honor and equity.

3] As for the reason for being deleted, you can go to the "Know the complaint" to complain, please provide the missing or not displayed problem or title, full content, [supplement], [post ID, post time], the administrator will verify and deal with it according to the relevant information you provide

In addition, bounty points are deducted as soon as the question is submitted and will not be returned regardless of the outcome.

4] In order to avoid such a situation, I hope that everyone can take a moment to carefully read the principles of knowing before asking questions, and then ask questions after understanding the principles of knowing, after all, only when everyone understands the rules and abides by the rules, can we ensure the healthy and orderly development of our platform, 5].

There are a few things to keep in mind to get your questions reviewed quickly.

The issue of violation cannot be raised, and the specific provisions can be referred to the [Know Agreement].

Don't ask questions about the Internet** (sometimes** will also be swallowed).

If a question is swallowed, it is better to complain, and do not immediately ask a similar question, which can easily be swallowed and the question is deleted.

Later, if your question is added with bounty points, then [your bounty will not be returned], so your bounty cannot be recovered

In addition, if it is a problem with **, it will be reviewed for a few minutes, but it will generally be released, just wait patiently.

No matter how many levels there are, you can't escape the scrutiny, so let go of your heart.

To quote a quote from the patriarch who knew it.

You still have a long way to go.

In this case, there is no other way but to complain, and there are as many people as you who encounter this kind of problem.

It is normal for complaints to be not accepted or to be processed very slowly.

Now I know that the efficiency of complaints is surprisingly slow.

I'm used to it now, and I don't complain about it anymore.

The waste of energy has not been solved, and the mood is not good, and the gains outweigh the losses.

I hope you can calm down a little bit and don't take it so seriously.

Even if it passes the review, the issue will be removed as long as someone maliciously reports or complains.

Individual failure problems are recommended to go to "Know the Complaint" to complain and recover.

If it is a large area, it is recommended to go to the top post of "Know the Opinion Society" to follow the post feedback.

There will be a bar to help you record and process, and you can also directly send a private message or add Du Qiushui or Du Xiaoyou contact person through hi, and let them help deal with it.