In your eyes, is it a star to be sought after, or a scientist to be sought after?

Of course, scientists are worth pursuing, after all, if a country wants to develop, it must need scientific and technological innovation, not the appearance of stars, and scientists are the main force in the rise of great powers.

I think it is worth pursuing scientists, scientists bring us a wonderful world, new things, new technologies, let us discover a better living environment, overcome all difficulties.

I think in my eyes, it may be that scientists are worth seeking, because it is precisely because of the existence of scientists that it has brought a lot of convenience to our current lives, and it has also made us more aware of the world.

Of course, scientists are worth pursuing, and the efforts made by scientists for society are very obvious, and what other efforts can celebrities do in addition to entertaining the masses?

In my opinion, scientists are the most sought-after people, because the progress of a country, only when science and technology progress, can the country become rich and strong. Therefore, scientists are the most worthy of our pursuit and admiration.

I think that scientists are worthy of being pursued, scientists are people who really work hard for people's lives, and it is obvious that they should be pursued moderately, not vigorously pursued, and let the people who really contribute be buried.

In fact, in my eyes, scientists are worth seeking, because scientists have actually made a great contribution to our society. It is their practice that leads to the truth of the world.

Scientists, because they are improving our lives, improving our scientific and technological level, and promoting the development of the whole society.

It is definitely that scientists are more worthy of pursuit, because scientists have made great contributions to our country and people, and the country cannot do without them.

In my eyes, I think scientists are more worthy of pursuit than actors, after all, scientists are what we humans and our country have done, and there is no comparison between the two.

Scientists, scientists who contribute to human development, can improve people's lives, and deserve to be sought after.

Because the job of a star is to show his head and bring something to the public, while a scientist needs to be able to follow other fields such as technology, mainly to develop his achievements or for the country. Moreover, the work of celebrities is more interesting, and everyone likes to watch it, while the work of scientists is more advanced and tasteful, and ordinary people can't understand it, so scientists don't pay so much attention.

Celebrities will make up some fake news and hype in order to gain the public's like, but scientists don't do this, because science is particularly rigorous, and such things are never allowed to happen, so the attention of scientists is not as high as that of stars, but scientists are much higher than you are now for the construction of the country, and their value is much higher than that of celebrities. A little news displayed in the star will rush to the hot search and attract the attention of a large number of netizens. But this kind of thing can be forgotten by everyone as long as it passes the baptism of time, but if it is a scientist's business and rushes to the hot search, then everyone will always keep it in mind, after all, what scientists do is for the sake of the country.

Grandpa's scientific and technological research; Our epidemic is under control, mainly relying on Zhongnanshan.

Grandpa's reasonable analysis, and so on.

I don't think celebrities and scientists have any refills, because the job of celebrities is to create some entertainment and pastime for the public. They can only achieve better results through the audience's love and make it easier to make money, so the relationship between celebrities and the public is particularly close, because celebrities enjoy fans, they need a lot of public attention, so they will try their best to win the public's attention.

Because in recent years, everyone has more understanding of scientists, so many people have a preliminary understanding of some scientists who do not know, and some people will also make them their idols, which is the real sense of idols.

Because these scientists are low-key and don't hype, naturally no one pays attention to them, so I sometimes think this situation is quite embarrassing, but no one pays attention to the people who are really worthy of respect.

Because now many young people don't care about some of the dynamics of scientists, they only care about these traffic stars. The main reason is that the hype in the entertainment industry is too strong, and people are chasing stars.

Because the nature of their work is different. The stars themselves stand in front of the spotlight. A lot of people can see them. Scientists, on the other hand, should focus on their careers in obscurity.

There is a common phenomenon, whether at home or abroad, celebrities, including entertainment stars, sports stars, etc., their income is much higher than that of scientists and people with ultra-high scientific research ability, so can we say that the contribution of stars is greater than the income of scientific researchers?

Let's take a closer look at their respective contributions to society.

If celebrities can have relatively high value and income, it is also determined by society or the market, and their value is not determined by any institution or individual. Part of the main value of celebrities is that they can bring joy to people's lives, and the other part can be used to endorse enterprises and increase the competitiveness of enterprises' products, but this is not a necessary factor for the quality and performance of the products themselves.

The main value of scientists lies in the scientific research results or some important theories, which will revolutionize the production of various industries, and the value of the current or future production and life is also incalculable.

If a famous star is missing, it will basically have no impact on society, or it will soon heat up a star. If a key scientist is missing, it will have an impact in a certain field, and it may take 5 or 10 years to make up for it. Why, then, did society not allow scientists to get higher returns, or rather, scientists gained less materially, and they gained fame?

Is it also a balance?

<>First of all, these are completely two industries, and secondly, many people are comparing the top of the entertainment industry with the bottom of the scientific research community.

Let's talk about these two industries first. The entertainment industry is a business, and it is for making money, and the money that capital has thrown into it and made in the past two years is very considerable. Celebrities are a tool for capital to make money, and by the way, they also earn a little themselves.

The primary purpose of the scientific research community is not to make money, of course, it is necessary to make money, but there are things in the academic circle that are more important than money, especially reputation. The academic circle attaches great importance to reputation, and this reputation is mainly academic reputation, which is piled up by such things as ** and titles. With the results in the early stage, it is good to apply for the project later, and only after taking the project can you afford to support yourself.

Let's talk about the pyramids of these two industries. Many little stars look beautiful, but life is still very hard, and there are still a few who really make a lot of money. The entertainment industry pyramid is very obvious, there are only a few scenery on the top floor, and there are many small transparents below that are invisible to the general public.

The stars we saw can be said to have stepped on these small transparent bones to get on the top, which is a bit of a success. As for those dry bones, you can refer to the horizontal drift, most of them have meager salaries, and they have food when they get to the play, and they rely on the sky to eat. The difference in income between the top and bottom floors is worlds apart.

However, the academic circle is different, and the funding of the project may be very different, some green peppers can only get tens of thousands of dollars, while the funds of Niu Ben are tens of millions or even hundreds of millions. But that's just money you can spend, not your own money. The difference in teachers' salaries is not so big, taking my school as an example, an unknown 985, the salary of an associate professor is about 200,000 yuan (before tax), but even if it is an academician, the annual salary is not 2 million.

Scientists may not be able to make a lot of money, but there is still no problem with food and clothing, and it is not a dream to be rich with a little hard work.

Scientists and celebrities belong to two circles, one circle has a small maximum, but a minimum is not small; There is also a circle where the maximum is large, but the minimum is also small. Many people compare individuals to individuals, but it is not really interesting. After all, I don't know who wins and who loses than making money, but I haven't seen anyone who can burn money more than a scientist than spending money.

For example, Shi Yigong, do you really know how much the electron microscope in his laboratory is worth...

How to look at scientists and, stars, these are two different professions, the scientists they are engaged in are very rigorous The use of the knowledge they have learned is very in place, and the people's hearts are shown to everyone in the form of performances, so these are two different positions, different professions, both are good, and the advantages of scientists and scientists Stars also have advantages, both are very good, and they are worthy of everyone's respect.

In this society, people pay too much attention to celebrities, and even reach a certain level of irrationality.

Scientists, on the other hand, are the real "stars" that have been ignored indifferently

The two are not in the same direction, and the degree of attention and professionalism attracted is not a criterion that can be judged. Can't compare.

Scientists and celebritiesWe should pay more attention to scientists, scientists have brought progress to people, like this epidemic, it is all up to scientists, relying on famous stars has long been over. Celebrities just bring us entertainment, escape from reality for a while, and do not bring social progress, but make everyone waste time, and scientists can make human beings more progressive. Only scientists will be remembered by future generations.

Personally, I think it is scientists who need more attention, and scientists have made great contributions to the country and the people. Celebrities bring more than entertainment.

Stars, of course.

1 star earns money (is noticed) by this

2. Scientists don't like to be disturbed (affect research), and at the same time don't take this test to make money (being followed), 3. Making money by paying attention is not good for the scientific research atmosphere, and the economy is easy for scientists to become bricks

I never pay attention to that star, I can only say that I watch a good movie, and it is difficult for scientists to pay attention to it, at least those scientists who do things don't know. Let's just pay attention to this area.

Both can be paid attention to, one popular science and one entertainment, both can enrich life, learn and entertain at the same time, there is no conflict at all, as long as you are interested.

I think, in fact, the celebrities themselves may not feel that they are great.

It's just that there are too many people who are chasing after it, so they have a fluttering feeling

It's because we think of stars as amazing, so perfect......

In fact, like us, they also eat the crops grown by the farmer's uncle, drink water, use electricity, and live on the earth ......

I think they are different because their strengths are shown, and they have their own selling points:

There are those who sing well, those who write well, and those who can speak well, like Sister Furong, it seems that many people think she can't do it, but she is also famous, and the selling point is her courage ......

In fact, when everyone shows their strengths and is discovered by others, they become stars

Celebrities aren't perfect, and they may not know something that we think is very basic

Therefore, I think that when we see the shortcomings of others, we should also think about the strengths of others, and when we see the shortcomings of others, we should also look at their good side

Sometimes, chasing stars is chasing a better self, and good chasing stars can promote your own progress, not to talk about why.

A lot of the products now are on their shoulders. The light bulb was invented by Edison and changed the world.

Tanks, new types of **, all need people to study, especially our hydrogen bomb, the successful development of the atomic bomb, are the work of scientists, the success of their development, will enhance China's international status, if you can develop something that other countries do not have, you will push China to the position of the world, protect the country, consolidate the country. Looking back on history, I think that a scientist is a successful person, no scientist fails, if you want to be a successful person, can you be a scientist? Hehe.

There are also people who want to be successful and don't necessarily become scientists, and they think they are useful.