The stone beast in the river is translated sentence by sentence, and the stone beast in the river is

In the south of Cangzhou, a temple is near the river (gān), the mountain gate 圮 (pǐ) is in the river, and the two stone beasts are sunk.

Reading the tenth author Ji Yun is more than years old, the monk raised money to rebuild, and asked for the stone beast in the water, but he couldn't get it. I thought that I was going down the river, and I counted small boats, and I searched for more than ten miles, but there was no trace.

A lecturer set up a tent in the temple, and he smiled and said: "You can't study physics, how can you carry it for the skyrocket?"

It is stony and heavy, sand loose and floating, and the annihilation (yān) is on the sand, gradually sinking and deepening.

Asking for it along the river, isn't it? "Convincing is conclusive.

When an old river soldier heard this, he smiled and said: "If there is a stone lost in the river, you should ask for it upstream." The cover stone is heavy, the sand is loose and floating, the water can not rush the stone, its anti-expulsion force, it will be in the water under the stone to bite (niè) the sand for the kan hole, gradually agitated and deepened, to the half of the stone, the stone will be thrown into the kan hole.

If it is bitten again, the stone will turn again, and then it will turn endlessly, and then it will go back to the upstream. Seek the lower stream, solid; In the land of seeking, isn't it more serious? ”

As he said, the fruit is several miles away. However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, but you can decide to judge it according to reason?

Translations. A temple in the south of Cangzhou is close to the riverbank, and the gate collapses in the river, and the two stone beasts sink to the bottom of the river together.

After more than ten years, the monk raised money to rebuild the temple, and searched for two stone beasts in the river, but finally did not find them, thinking that they were going down the river. Rocking a few small boats and pulling an iron rake, I searched for more than ten miles, but there was no trace.

A lecturer who was teaching in a temple laughed at this, "You people cannot reason. It's not a piece of wood, how can it be carried away by the water? The nature of the stone is hard and heavy, and the nature of the sand is loose and light, buried in the sand, sinking deeper and deeper.

Isn't it ridiculous to look for them along the river? "Everyone thinks he is right.

When an old river soldier heard this, he laughed and said, "Whenever stones fall into the river, look for them from upstream." The nature of the stone is hard and heavy, the nature of the sand is loose and light, the water cannot wash away the stone, and its reaction force must be under the stone to hit the sand in front of the stone head-on to form a pit.

The deeper and deeper it goes, halfway through it, the stone will fall into the pit. Hit like this, and the stone shifts again. kept shifting, so instead went upstream.

It is absurd to go downstream to look for stones; Wouldn't it be more ridiculous to look for them in their place? ”

According to his words, the stone beast was found a few miles away. There are many examples of things in the world that only know the superficial phenomena and do not know the deep meaning, can we make subjective assumptions?

Gargoyle River" Ji Yun for the "Sketch" volume 16 "Delusional Listening", the main content is the article that lost the Gargoyle River, because of the momentum of the water, the weight of the monster itself, so, looking for the monster to drop the monster upstream to find. Meaning.

The article is about considering specific issues, not taking it for granted. **Document article: For the position of the head of the river stone to judge its monk, is based on; Judge Speaker, the grounds are; The veteran identified its river because;

"Stone Beasts in the River" is from the Qing Dynasty Ji Xiaolan's "Notes on Reading Wei Caotang", and the vernacular text is as follows:

Cangzhou South One Temple is close to the river, the mountain gate is in the river, and the two stone beasts are sinking. Reading more than ten years old, the monk raised money to rebuild, and asked for two stone beasts in the water, but he couldn't get it. I thought that I was going down the river, and I counted the boats, and there was no trace for more than ten miles.

Vernacular text: A lecturer set up a tent temple, and said with a smile: "The stone is heavy, the sand is loose and floating, and it is annihilated on the sand, and it gradually sinks deeper and deeper." Asking for it along the river, isn't it also upside down? ”

Vernacular: A lecturer who taught in a temple heard about this and said with a smile: "The characteristics of the stone should be hard and heavy, and the characteristics of the river sand are loose and light, and the stone beast is buried in the sand, and the deeper it sinks." Isn't it ridiculous to go down the river to find them? ”

When an old river soldier heard this, he smiled and said: "If there is a stone lost in the river, you should ask for it upstream." The cover stone is heavy, the sand is loose and floating, the water can not rush the stone, and its anti-excitation force must bite the sand at the place where the water meets the water under the stone for the hole. Seek the lower stream, solid upside; In the land of seeking, isn't it more upside down? ”

Vernacular: When an old river soldier heard about it, he smiled and said, "If you fall into the river, you should look for it upstream."

The stone is characterized by being hard and heavy, and the river sand is characterized by being loose and light. It is absurd to go downstream to look for stone beasts; Wouldn't it be more ridiculous to look for them in their place? ”

As he said, the fruit is several miles away. However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, so you can make assumptions based on reason?

Vernacular: The monks did what Lao Hebing said, and sure enough, they found a stone beast in the upper reaches a few miles away. Since this is the case, there are too many situations in which we only know one thing and don't know the other, so how can we make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

For the translation of the Stone Beast in the River, let's first learn "The Stone Beast in the River".

Original: Stone Beast in the River.

Ji Yun Qing Dynasty

Cangzhou South One Temple is close to the river, the mountain gate is in the river, and the two stone beasts are sinking. Reading more than ten years old, the monk raised money to rebuild, and asked for two stone beasts in the water, but he couldn't get it, thinking that he would go down the river. Count the small boats, drag the iron and palladium, and find more than ten miles without a trace.

A lecturer set up a tent in the temple, and said with a smile: "You can't study physics." If it is not a wooden pestle, how can it be carried away for the skyrocket? It is stony and heavy, sand loose and floating, annihilated on the sand, gradually sinking deeper and deeper. Asking for it along the river, isn't it also upside down? "Convincing is conclusive.

When an old river soldier heard this, he smiled and said: "If there is a stone lost in the river, you should ask for it upstream." Cover the stone is heavy, the sand is loose and floating, the water can not rush the stone, its countershock force, it will bite the sand at the water under the stone for the hole, gradually agitate and deepen, to the half of the stone, the stone will be thrown into the hole.

If it is bitten again, the stone will turn again. turned around, and then reversed the flow and went backwards. Seek the lower stream, solid upside; In the land of seeking, isn't it more upside down?

As he said, the fruit is several miles away. However, the things of the world, but if you know one of them, you don't know how many of the two are there, so you can make assumptions based on reason? (Turn around a work:

Translation: There is a temple near the river bank in the south of Cangzhou, and the gate of the temple collapsed in the river, and the two stone beasts in front of the gate also sank in the river. After more than ten years, the monks raised money to rebuild the temple, and searched for two stone beasts in the river, but they still did not find them, and the monks believed that the stone beasts had flowed downstream along the water.

So he rowed a few small boats, dragged the iron palladium, and searched for more than ten miles downstream, but found no trace of the stone beast.

When a lecturer who was teaching in a temple heard about this, he smiled and said, "You people cannot reason. This is not a piece of wood, how can it be carried away by a surging flood?

The stone is hard and heavy, the sediment is soft and floating, and the stone beast is buried in the sand, sinking deeper and deeper. Isn't it ridiculous to follow the river to find stone beasts? Everyone was convinced and thought it was the right statement.

When an old river soldier heard the lecturer's view, he smiled and said, "Whatever stone falls into the river, you should look for it in the upper reaches of the river." It is precisely because the nature of the stone is hard and heavy, and the nature of the sand is soft and frivolous, that the water cannot wash away the stone, and the force of the water recoil must erode the sand to form a pit in the place where the water meets the water below the stone, and the more agitated and deeper, when the pit extends to half of the bottom of the stone, the stone must be dumped in the pit.

If you wash it again like this, the stone will turn again. It keeps turning like this, so it goes upstream in the opposite direction against the current. It would have been absurd to go down the river in search of stone beasts; Wouldn't it seem even more ridiculous to look for them where the stone beasts sank?

As a result, he followed his words and searched for it, and sure enough, he found a stone beast a few miles upstream. In this case, there are many cases in the world where we only know the superficial phenomena and do not know the fundamental truth, so can we make subjective judgments based on a certain truth?

Category: Games.

Analysis: Original text: Cangzhou Nanyi Temple is near the river, the mountain gate is in the river, and the two stone beasts are sinking.

Translation: A temple in the south of Cangzhou near the river bank, the gate collapsed in the river, and two stone beasts sank to the bottom of the river together.

Original text: Reading more than ten years old, the monk raised money to rebuild, and asked for two stone beasts in the water, but he couldn't get it, thinking that he was going downstream.

Translation: After more than ten years, the monk raised money to rebuild the temple, and searched for two stone beasts in the river, but he did not find them, thinking that they were going down the river.

Original text: Count the boats, drag the iron and palladium, and find more than ten miles without a trace.

Translation: Rocking a few small boats and pulling an iron rake, I searched for more than ten miles without a trace.

Original text: A lecturer set up a tent in the temple, and he smiled and said:

Translation: A lecturer who was teaching in a temple listened to the ridicule and said:

Original text: "You can't study physics. If it is not a wooden pestle, how can it be carried away for the skyrocket?

Translation: "You people cannot reasone with the truth of things." It's not a piece of wood, how can it be carried away by the water?

Original text: It is stony and heavy, loose and floating, annihilated on the sand, gradually sinking and deepening.

Translation: The nature of the stone is hard and heavy, and the nature of the sand is loose and light, buried in the sand, the deeper it sinks.

Original text: Seeking it along the river, isn't it also upside down? "Convincing is conclusive.

Original text: When an old river soldier heard this, he smiled and said: "Where there is a stone lost in the river, you should ask for it upstream."

When an old sailor heard this, he laughed and said, "Whenever stones fall into the river, look for them upstream."

Original text: The cover stone is heavy, the sand is loose and floating, the water can not rush the stone, and its counterattack force will be in the water under the stone to bite the sand for the hole.

Translation: The nature of the stone is hard and heavy, the nature of the sand is loose and light, the water cannot wash away the stone, and its reaction force must be under the stone to hit the sand in front of the stone head-on to form a pit.

Original text: Gradually agitated and deepened, to the half of the stone, the stone will be thrown into the hole.

Translation: The deeper you go, the more you go, and halfway through it, the stone will fall into the pit.

Original text: If it is bitten again, the stone will turn again. turned around, and then reversed the flow and went backwards.

Translation: Hit like this, and the stone shifts again. kept shifting, so instead went upstream.

Original text: Seek the lower stream, solid upside; In the land of seeking, isn't it more upside down? ”

Translation: It is absurd to go downstream to look for stones; Wouldn't it be more ridiculous to look for them in their place? ”

Original text: As he said, the fruit is obtained several miles away.

Translation: According to his words, he found (the stone beast) a few miles away.

Original text: However, the things of the world, but I know one of them, and I don't know how many of the two, can I make assumptions based on reason?

Translation: So there are many examples of things in the world that only know one side and do not know the other, and can we make subjective assumptions based on the truth (of one aspect)?