Promoting democracy would dilute the sense of command

No. Because democracy still has to be centralized in the end.

In any country with **, "democracy" is relative; Sectors are different from national conditions.

The law is the command: the irresistible order.

The more democracy is promoted, the more detailed the relative laws and regulations, and the greater the "sense of command."

When studying and discussing issues, we should regard ourselves as equal members of the team, give full play to democracy, and make decisions in strict accordance with proceduresDo what you doPay attention to listening to different opinions, correctly treat the opinions of a small number of people, and do not engage in one-word halls or even paternalism.

The blanks should be filled in - follow the rules.

I don't know what grade you studied politics, but this kind of question should be viewed dialectically. Either side will have good reasons to say it's right, depending on what you choose. From the perspective of personal efforts, first of all, growth and progress are inseparable from personal efforts, which is the interconnectedness of things, and then growth and progress are the result of personal efforts, and personal efforts are the inevitable factors of growth and progress.

Second, from the perspective of organizational culture, the environment is important to people's growth and progress, and the environment shapes people. Personally, I think I'm more supportive of the importance of individual efforts, you choose.

It is inseparable from the cultivation of the organization and the efforts of individuals.

Service skills are something that can be replicated. In some cases, service skills are appropriate for branding. The sense of service is a kind of moral level, and the premise of the existence of service consciousness is the existence of the idea of benevolence, so the strength or weakness of the sense of service determines whether a brand can be built into a brand.

I'm in sales. When the skills are extremely in place, people will become business masters, but they will be very tired.

And when the sense of service is extremely in place, people will have a lot of friends, and the final result is often a good effect. Even if the skills are slightly lacking, the importance of the skills will be diluted by the enthusiasm, love, and care for the customer.

But even better, when the sense of service is strong, the skills will improve quickly. So, attitude is everything.

I have to say which is more important, I say, the sense of service is more important.

Which is more important, the head or the heart?

Of course, both are equally important.

As far as the sense of service of employees is concerned, I think that it is difficult to cultivate the consciousness of most of the employees' ratings, and the skills can be cultivated, and it cannot be said who is more important.

The mind determines the limbs. Consciousness is the mind, and skill is the limbs.

If an enterprise wants to develop, it must have more excellent employees, how can we provide good service without a good sense of service, and will master good skills through the verification of time, but without a good sense of work, 100,000 people can not get it, so awareness is more important.

First of all, the prosperity of a country must be armed with knowledge. Especially in today's era of peace, the level of scientific and technological development has become an indicator of a country's comprehensive strength. Although jobs cannot grow at the rate of growth of college students, some college students cannot find a job for a while, or cannot find a good job.

However, if this alone denies the usefulness of reading, then I would like to ask, if everyone does not study, how can society develop? How can the overall strength of the country be improved? If you fall behind, you will be beaten!

Do we still want to be called the "sick man of East Asia" by others?

No matter what the era, reading is useful. Society is developing, knowledge is being updated, and without knowledge it is impossible to gain a foothold in society. Franklin said:

No one can take away the knowledge, and the most benefits are from investing in knowledge." Today, some college students cannot find a job, which only indicates that there is a problem with their own employability and perception. It doesn't mean that reading is useless.

That's why I insist that reading is useful!

Opposite: We might as well take the proposition that is useful for reading as a true proposition and put it in reality to test. Today, when it is becoming more and more difficult to find a job and the threshold for job hunting is getting higher and higher, many college students have been busy with their way out after graduation since the day they entered the university.

All non-practical, non-technical, non-quantifiable, and unrelated disciplines that are not directly related to job hunting are gradually being left out in the cold, and people are keen to chase computer grades, English grades, and various qualifications to meet the needs of the recruitment market, and dress themselves up and shape themselves according to the needs of recruiters. When students are busy for employment all day long, when "knowledge-seeking" gives way to "job hunting", can we still say that "reading is useful"?

The method of debating is the main point.

There are many ways to debate, one is to change concepts, and the other is to design reasoning problems (dilemma reasoning is the best), which are the two most commonly used methods.

In this debate, the argument is "subjective consciousness" and "objective conditions". You can secretly change it to other terms to explain, of course, you have to secretly change it to one that is beneficial to your side.

The other question is how to design the reasoning problem, and general, formal logic and philosophy are the most used in debate. For example, how to design reasoning is a test of logical thinking ability. Your logical problems are usually thought out in advance, because it's too late to use your brain when you get to the field.

You can design a series of questions to take the initiative, and you can ask some questions that seem to be the first thing to do, but are actually contradictory, and let the other party refute themselves, and once the other party falls into a logical problem, as long as they grasp the initiative well, they will be completely mastered, and victory is within reach. (In addition, regardless of whether the logic is used correctly or not, as long as it is used, the impact on the judges will be much better.)

In addition, this debate is clearly theoretically unfavorable to the positive side. Because in the Chinese philosophical system, objective existence always determines subjective consciousness, and the cultivation of the same bad habit must be catalyzed by objectively existing things or others. Therefore, the viewpoint is dominated by the positive viewpoint, but it can be modest, otherwise it will give people a high hat and say that the positive viewpoint is an idealistic viewpoint.

It's impossible to get someone to help you solve the problem.

You should refer to the defense, but if you can see the defense, others can see it.

Think a few more steps.

Read more books, it will be good for you.

First of all, you have to know what is collective, what is collective consciousness, what is individual, what is individual consciousness.

version, then, you have to understand which stages of children are referred to by middle school students, most of them refer to the post-90s, and, from the debate, it can be seen that both sides do not deny the existence of these two consciousnesses, but find a starting point on a balance beam. In addition, we can say that collective consciousness is a volunteer, and individual consciousness can be said to protect oneself, but you have to understand that individual consciousness and selfishness are not the same.

I can only say so much because you didn't say whether you were positive or negative.

The cultivation of collective consciousness, because learning is still for better employment, and in this economic society, employment requires team spirit, so it is necessary to cultivate collective consciousness.