How true is the rumor that NASA photographed a supership near the sun?

This was already news last year, and last summer the astronomical pages were full of questions about giant ships near the sun.

Between introducing this question, I must explain to the landlord the three principles of scientific theory:

1.Consistent with Observed Fact 2Self-consistent 3Assume as few assumptions as possible (especially those that are difficult to prove).

The first two points are the basis of scientific theories, and the third point, also known as Occam's razor, must be considered on the premise of meeting the first two points.

Here's a simple example:

Hypothesis 1: The moon is round.

Hypothesis 2: The moon is square, but the moon is spiritual, and when you look at the moon, the moon becomes round.

Is it consistent with the observed facts? All in line. Self-consistent? It's also self-consistent. So which one will the landlord believe?

Apparently the former. Because the latter has an extra moon is a spiritual assumption.

Let's take another example from when a dinosaur fossil was discovered:

Hypothesis one: This is the remains of a creature that once existed and has become extinct.

Hypothesis 2: This is the devil to tease us, burying bones in the ground to fool us.

Let's analyze the hypotheses of the two, how many hypotheses need to be proved in the second hypothesis to be believed that "there is a devil", "the devil has the ability to create creatures that do not exist", "the devil buried the remains in the ground for some motive".

Which of the two is more credible? Needless to say.

Okay, back to the landlord's question:

Explanation 1: NASA said: "**Compression produces small spots of light".

Explanation 2: Network: This is an alien flying machine.

Let's look at the first explanation, a very ordinary one.

Second, how many assumptions need to be proved: "There are aliens", "Aliens have discovered the solar system", "Aliens have the ability to fly interstellar", "Aliens can build Earth-sized vehicles", "Aliens have mastered some kind of technology and can withstand temperatures of 6000K (studying chemistry, this is not an easy problem to solve)", "Aliens are in some kind of motivation and have made hundreds of flying machines to orbit around the sun".

Both interpretations are consistent with observational facts and are self-consistent. But what about the more credible kind of thing based on what I said about Occam's razor? While I can't deny that the latter may be true, it is far less likely to be true than the former, requiring so many hard-to-prove hypotheses.

It's good to explain why the mainstream ** is silent. If I were a newspaper about this, I would really devote a large section of the page to it** I would probably be criticized by scientists. Why take the comments on the Internet seriously?

Let's take a look at the landlord, the comments on the Internet are not big enough to take advantage of our expectations, we hope that there will be extraterrestrial life, so someone fakes the results we want. And it's easy for us to embrace them.

There are many such examples in history, such as the giant Kraft, the Piertans, the Fujimura Shinichi, etc., all of which take advantage of the public's psychological expectations, and there is room for fraud. The landlord is interested in taking a look at these stories, which are interesting, but also sobering.

Life is truly magical. The only civilization known to mankind is humans. Although we absolutely do not believe that only human civilization exists in the vast universe, after decades of exploration, human beings are still in vain. Where are they? Do they really not exist?

In today's society, the vast majority of people still believe in the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, but due to unknown factors such as technology, distance, etc., they cannot meet each other, and this encounter is relative to everyone, because we often hear a series of events in life, such as UFOs appearing in **, and someone has made contact with aliens.

Rumors about UFOs do not only occur on Earth, but humans have also encountered UFOs many times when they go into space, and even feel that they are being watched by some UFOs, as if to say, "We are watching you." ”

What is an unknown object near the Sun? Are they really here to absorb solar energy? We can't judge that. We haven't fully solved UFO events on Earth, let alone in space. These mysteries can only be solved later by you.

It has not been officially confirmed, so I can only say that it is speculation, but I personally think that it is just a small meteor or something, grazing around the sun, forming such an image. I think this conjecture is more real than absorbing energy.

First of all, all kinds of remarks about aliens are actually our own conjectures, and we have not really come into contact with aliens and alien cultures, and we can rely on our own reasoning and imagination to describe them.

Of course not, if there is such a high-level alien civilization, according to the cosmic law of the dark jungle, the ancient sites of the earth civilization will also be wiped out in minutes. There is also an illusion of light and shadow in photography, so you can't jump to conclusions.

n a s a photographed a mysterious flying object around the sun, in fact, it is possible that aliens are sucking energy. Because the mysterious flying object actually doesn't know whether it's an alien or not, it also belongs to a mystery.

The diameter of the Sun is 1.39 million kilometers, which is 109 times that of the Earth and 400 times that of the Moon. The Sun is 1.3 million times the volume of the Earth, 330,000 times the mass of the Earth, and has an average density of grams3.

Thousands of spaceships the size of the earth can appear a large shadow on the sun, which can be seen by ordinary astronomical telescopes, so many astronomy enthusiasts, who will not rush to announce it as soon as possible. So it's impossible.

In terms of size, it is difficult to hide, and the sunspots that humans can observe are much smaller in diameter than the Earth, and they can be seen even if they are scattered. In addition, the earth is so far away from the sun, and it takes 30 kilometers per second to resist the sun's gravity, which is also impossible from a gravitational point of view.

Why not? Because there are no such things, it won't.

False, it's planets. The Earth is protected by an atmosphere.