Why did Tang Taizong Li Shimin tamper with history and smear his father and brother

History is written by the victors.

Everyone wants to live forever, but if you want to live for a hundred years, you can't have black spots, so it's tampered with! Whether it was tampered with or not, only he himself knows, or history is simply wrong, because there is no evidence! He is also a generation of Mingjun, so it is understandable!

How to tamper with history, even if there is no Xuanwumen coup, there will be other events that prompt Taizong to succeed to the throne, Jinyang raised troops was Taizong's idea, Taizong, Gaozu, Liu Wenjing, Pei Lin decided to do things after discussing together, including the later elimination of local secession, like Liu Wuzhou, Wang Shichong, Dou Jiande and other heroes of the world, which one was not eliminated by Taizong.

I'm sorry, but from ancient times to the present, no one has recorded 100% of his past.

That's for sure, if you don't tamper with history, you're not scolded to death by future generations!

Li Shimin's "killing his brother and forcing his father" is the need of political struggle, and if he does not kill his brother, he may be killed by his brother. His "killing his brother and forcing his father" can be regarded as a historical blessing, because he achieved the great cause of the Tang Dynasty's "Zhenguan Rule", laying a solid foundation for China's feudal society to reach its peak in the Tang Dynasty!

Li Shimin wants to be the emperor, Li Shimin has the quality of an emperor, Li Shimin has the strength to be an emperor, and Li Shimin has the means to kill his brother and become an emperor! The stain of fratricidal cannibalism, the achievement of the rule of Zhenguan!

In ancient times, the throne of the emperor was the most competitive profession, and many tragedies of sons killing their fathers and fratricidal brothers were staged in order to compete for this chair. Li Shimin's Xuanwumen change is only one side of it. One mountain cannot accommodate two tigers.

If Li Shimin didn't do this, he wouldn't be able to ascend to the throne, and it was unlikely that he would die, but his military power would definitely be gone. The people in Tiance Mansion are also going to be dispersed.

This incident is known in history as the "Xuanwumen Incident", which was essentially a struggle for power within the ruling group of the Tang Dynasty. After Li Yuan established the Tang Dynasty, Li Jiancheng was named the crown prince, and Li Shimin, the king of Qin, who had made great contributions in the process of unifying the country, was dissatisfied, so the two sides fought openly and secretly.

If you don't kill him, he will kill you, what about the brother who worked with you? Once he fails, he and his family and his subordinates who have worked hard for him will have to play, even if he doesn't want to earn it, Cheng Bites Jin, and the eldest grandson Wuji Wei Chi Gong will also let him do it.

If there was no Xuanwu Gate, Li Shimin would have been killed by Li Jiancheng if he lost, and the eldest grandson Wuji, Fang Xuanling, and Du Ruhui would not have survived.

Because he wants to cover up the facts, falsify history, and work for the benefit of the majority of people, in fact, this is a trick played by all dynasties.

Li Shimin is so vicious, there are still many people chasing after him, Zhu Di is far worse than Li Shimin in this regard, I don't know why many people slander him, it seems that the world has really changed, and there is no place to reason.

If you don't kill your brother, you will be killed by your brother, and when did he kill his father?

He has little reading and a low level of civilization, so he did this kind of thing that is contrary to human ethics and rebellion!

Li First of all, the title should be changed, it is Li Shimin who killed his brother and brother, not his father.

Brothers have reached the point of life and death, and if you don't strike first, you are waiting for death. However, he did not kill his father, Li Yuan has been the emperor for many years, and he has added a few brothers and sisters to Li Shimin.

The Tang Dynasty, all countries come to the dynasty, the Tang Dynasty pioneers, inside and outside the Great Wall, thousands of miles of rivers and mountains, prosperous and brilliant.

Because he wants to be the emperor, he can't do it without killing his eldest brother.

Li Shimin killed his brother and forced his father to save his life.

The survival of the fittest is intentional to historical development and national interests.

s Yes, in fact, Emperor Yang of Sui and his eldest brother Li Jiancheng are not so bad, Li Jiancheng was also a cadre under Li Yuan back then, and people like Wei Zheng also followed him, how bad do you say Li Jiancheng can be? There is also Emperor Yang of Sui, this is easier to explain, the rise and fall of a dynasty must be replaced by a righteous name, otherwise he will become a usurper of the dynasty. So falsified history.

The history of each dynasty is not absolutely true, and the general history of the Tang Dynasty was written by the people of the Song Dynasty. But most of the accounts of major events are true, and the details and motives are up for debate. As an emperor, Li Shimin has the right to tamper with history, and no one can do it, but he is fair and just.

It can only be said that he has this ability, and suspicion. There is no conclusive evidence that he actually tampered with.

This question, Li Shiming tampered with history?

If in terms of merit, Li Shiming's rule of Zhenguan and the creation of a prosperous Tang Dynasty that the world looks forward to can be said to have changed history, at least from the character of several of his brothers recorded in the history books, it can be seen that others really do not have his ability.

If robbing his brother of the throne was a falsification of history, then he seems to have done the same.

Finally, your question is really vague, can you be clearer?

Yes. When he was in power, he saw the history books (that is, the books they recorded) and thought it was not good, so he changed it.

This can only be said to be possible, ancient historians are generally very responsible, if the emperor asks them to tamper with history, they will generally leave some clues in the history books for future generations to explore, so it is unlikely that Li Shimin tampered with history.

History is written by successful people, and obsessing over whether it is true or not will lose the fun of reading history.

Home News

See how Li Shimin tampered with the history of the Tang Dynasty! Restore the real Li Yuan and Li Jiancheng's three views are not correct2017-03-03 10:12Follow After Li Shimin ascended the throne, he once revised the living notes, deleted the merit records of Li Yuan and Li Jiancheng, and took all the achievements of his father and brother as his own credit, described his father Li Yuan as a weak and unassertive person, and described his brother Li Jiancheng as an incompetent and immoral person.

But fortunately, Wen Daya, a participant in the whole process of Li Yuan's Jiantang Dynasty, recorded this real history and wrote the book "Datang Entrepreneurship and Living Note", so that we can understand the true deeds and behavior of Li Yuan and Li Jiancheng.

Wen Daya was an important person around Li Yuan from Li Yuan's Taiyuan uprising to Chan Rang's claim to be emperor Jiantang, and he was an important person around Li Yuan - the Great General's Mansion Records Office joined the army, took charge of the army Chinese Han, and participated in the Tang Liguo etiquette. Wen Daya's official calendar was Li Yuan and Li Shimin's two dynasties, and the official was Li Guogong. Therefore, the authenticity of the records is high.