Protect animals and eat more than 100,000 catties of fish, why do farmers say can t be provoked ?

Because it was the state-protected animal that ate his fish, if he harmed the state-protected animal, he would be punished by law, so the farmer did not dare to do anything to the protected animal.

Because these animals are protected by the state, farmers do not dare to kill them easily, for fear of being punished by the first, so they say "can't be provoked".

The reason why farmers can't afford to provoke them is because the protection of animals is stipulated by the state to protect, and farmers cannot defend their rights.

Because this is a protected animal by the state, of course, farmers have no right to dispose of it, and I believe that the state will also give a certain solution.

Fish pond farmers, migratory birds use fish ponds as "canteens". The number of Oriental white stork, a national first-class protected animal, has reached more than 9,000 this year, and the number of farmed fish has been eaten, resulting in heavy losses for farmers.

Because it's a protected animal, I don't dare to mess with it, and if I offend it, it may break the law, so I don't want to suffer in this regard.

Because these are all nationally protected animals, they dare not hunt them, so they can't be provoked.

Protected animals eat up hundreds of thousands of catties of fish, because these animals are important protected animals in our country, and they have flown far away in a place, they are already quite hungry, and some of them are pregnant with babies in their stomachs, so they are extremely unbearable to hurt them.

Because the other party has a certain background, it is impossible to provoke the other party, which actually exposes a lot of problems.

It is migratory birds that eat up more than 100,000 fish from farmers, among which the Oriental white stork is the mainstay. Most of these migratory birds are protected by the state, and if they hurt themselves, they will go to jail. Today's fishermen are caught in a dilemma and don't know what to do.

Coupled with the presence of conservation volunteers, they can only watch their fish being eaten. Fortunately, the relevant ** is conducting a thorough investigation and compensating these fishermen. However, considering that the losses cannot be estimated, it is also difficult to find out.

1. The fish of farmers have been eaten up in Tianjin's Qilihai wetland, and there are a large number of fish ponds. And this site is also an important stop for migratory birds to migrate from north to south. However, this year is more special, as these migratory birds have not left until December, and only the Oriental White Stork is three times more numerous than in previous years.

Nearby farmers have been imprisoned for poisoning protected animals, which puts all farmers in a dilemma. I wanted to drive them away, but a large number of conservation volunteers said, "Migratory birds that migrate long distances must not go hungry, otherwise it will be difficult to get pregnant." Migratory birds themselves can fly, swim and dive, and hundreds of thousands of catties of fish have been eaten.

2. Protected Birds A large number of protected birds appear in the Qilihai wetland, and the number is several times that of previous years, which leads to an increase in the loss of farmers. A bird eats an average of three or four catties a day, and thousands of birds eat for more than a month, and most of the fish ponds of farmers are eaten up. An ordinary farmer loses hundreds of thousands, not to mention a wetland of nearly 70 kilometers, and I don't know how many farmers there are.

And these birds are smart and seem to know that they are protected. Eating fish was not driven away, and even Nanfei gave up completely, squatting by the fish pond every day, and going to eat when he was hungry. Farmers are afraid that they will break the law and will have to remove everything that will harm the birds.

3. It is difficult for the official to deal with this situation in the management of the government, but it is still necessary to protect the animals. Now the relevant departments have begun to find out the losses of farmers, and then give corresponding compensation. It's just that the loss is difficult to estimate, and the overall loss is too large, so it is difficult to estimate the compensation.

There is a similar phenomenon this year, and it will continue to occur in the future, and I am afraid that it will be difficult to completely solve the problem in compensation.

It should be borne by the state.

It is impossible to lie, because if you have more than 100,000 fish, it is impossible to raise white cranes in shallow waters.

In the future, these farmers will be allowed to directly receive wages, and the fry and feed will all be borne by the state.

What is a certain amount of compensation, I think it is full compensation. The biological world is a knockout game for the survival of the fittest, as long as it is not over-captured, deliberately killed, and natural disasters by humans, it is impossible for a species to completely disappear from this world.

This is not easy to say, I personally think that it is not easy for farmers to make some money, and several relevant local departments, such as the forestry department, the fishery department, and the environmental protection department, have joined forces to compensate the farmers for a part, and the farmers themselves also bear a little loss.

This responsibility should be borne by the farmers and the state, because there is no way to stop the hunting nature of the state-protected animals, and the farmers have also suffered losses, so they should be jointly responsible.

At present, the responsibility for the state's protected animals to eat up the hundreds of thousands of fish of the farmers should be borne by the fishermen themselves, and the state has also conducted a discussion on such a matter and strived to introduce a reasonable policy.

The state protects animals to eat up the hundreds of thousands of fish of farmers, and this responsibility may be borne by local people, because the state is protecting animals, and the state will come out to solve the damage caused.

I think it is up to the state to bear the corresponding responsibility and give some compensation.

I think this responsibility should be on the managers, because the managers should be responsible for not allowing the animals to eat up the fish of the farmers.

I think this responsibility should be borne by the state, because this is a state-protected animal, and farmers dare not hunt and kill at will, which leads to this situation.

I think of course it is up to the state to take this responsibility. Our country certainly has the financial resources to solve this problem.

This responsibility should be borne by the state to breed fish, because it is a national protected animal, and there should be a certain economic subsidy for farmers, after all, it is a loss of hundreds of thousands.

In many coastal areas, there are many fishermen who make a living from fish farming, and they can make a lot of money by selling those seafood to the market. But a big fish farmer in Tianjin has made a mistake, he has a lot of fish in the fish pond, and this year he is busy trying to catch the fish and bring it to the market to sell. But what he didn't expect was that when he fished the fish, the fish pond was empty, and there was nothing.

He planted 100,000 catties of fish fry in the fish pond, but now a few fish have not been caught, so there are no more.

For such a situation, Lao Feng can be said to be helpless, and he has no way to solve this matter. In fact, the fish that stole him were migratory birds, a national first-class protected animal, and they would gather in flocks on top of the fish pond. When the weather is cold, they migrate south, and the fishpond is their main habitat.

There are a lot of fish in the pond, so it attracts a lot of migratory birds. They go fishing in the fish pond, and a large number of migratory birds pull away all the seedlings scattered by the fishermen, and they can't hurt them, they can't drive them away, so it can be said that the fishermen are very helpless. If he wants to protect the fish, he has to chase away the birds, which sometimes cause harm to the animals.

If he wants to protect the birds, the fish will be gone, and they will not have a harvest for a year, so it is undoubtedly very difficult for such a situation.

Last year, the pond brought more than 1 million yuan to the fishermen. And now these migratory birds have eaten all the fish in front of them, resulting in these fishermen not having any harvest, which has seriously affected **. When they were fishing, the fish pond was eaten directly by these migratory birds, and they almost ran out of money.

Because there are many more migratory birds this year than last year, they will flock to the lotus pond to eat fish. Now the environment of the wetland is getting better and better, and many birds will come to this place to hunt. If it's a small amount of birds, then there's no problem.

Nowadays, so many birds come to the fish pond, and eating fish is very miserable for those fishermen。This happened before, because a fisherman accidentally poisoned migratory birds and ended up in prison. Therefore, they do not dare to drive away migratory birds easily, and if pesticides are sprinkled in the fish pond to kill these migratory birds, it is easy to be punished.

After such a thing happens, in fact, it should be actively dealt with, and there is a perfect policy to let those migratory birds go to the fish pond to eat fish in small quantities, so as to prevent those farmers from not having any harvest. Within a year, all the fish they had worked so hard to raise were eaten by these migratory birds, and it can be said that it is difficult to live.

In fact, while we protect wild animals, we must also ensure that people's lives are not affected in any way, so we must think of this best of both worlds to protect our industry from any harm.

I think farmers can take some measures, such as putting nets in the farmed lakes, so that they don't harm the birds protected by the state and can save the fish they farm.

I think it is indeed our duty to protect wild animals, but if we overprotect these animals, many people will suffer, crops will be destroyed, and fish ponds will be destroyed.

These fish are also very pitiful. There should be a way to get the animals to eat something else, otherwise the fish will be too unlucky.

I believe that the people involved in the protection of animals did not do their duty, which is why this happened.

I think it's really helpless, or the farmers should be compensated.