Students don t value history, but they have to take the history exam, what will you do as a history

First of all, the easiest first point is to change the way you teach. As a teacher, don't be so rigid when teaching and only talk about exams or books, and occasionally tell some short stories (preferably about history), which can stimulate students' interest in history and favor you as a teacher. Or interact with the students and play some games and competitions.

You can even learn a little trick of inserting a few dialects in the lecture to ensure that the whole class will be lively, and then the learning atmosphere will come up. Personally, I think there are only a few items that can be basically operated.

In addition, students should learn to explain historical events in as simple and plain language as possible. Don't just talk about the background, the overview, the meaning or something, there are a lot of tutorial books, then the teacher still needs to say. Students should be taught to think broadly about historical events on their own

What is the reason for this historical event, whether it is accidental or inevitable; What is its impact, whether it is good or bad; Or ask the students to think about what would have happened to the world if this historical event had not happened, and how it would have become. Students should be taught to think and summarize for themselves, and not just to memorize what is in reference books and textbooks. Of course, the content of the textbook should still be consolidated, after all, the textbook is very authoritative historians and educators after sorting it out before it can be used, and its role should not be belittled.

There is also the need to teach students to cultivate their own learning methods and learning pleasures. Let them be able to independently memorize some historical knowledge in some special methods that suit them. In fact, the students' thinking is very simple, the reason why students don't like history is actually because they can't study well, and they can't get the results they want in every exam, and it is understandable that they will gradually develop an aversion to history, forming a vicious circle.

But if they start to learn it slowly and their grades improve, they will immediately develop a strong interest in history, because history can become a field for expressing their abilities, and students will naturally value it and consciously learn it well, forming a virtuous circle. Therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to cultivating students' interest in learning and learning ability.

However, what I said is not something that can be achieved in a day or two, and it takes the teacher's long-term focus and hard work to create a class of students with excellent independent thinking ability and generalization ability.

And then what I said, do you understand? Either way, I hope you read it well. After all, education is a profession that some people think of as a livelihood, but some people will regard it as a lifelong career. Hope it helps. All right?

I'll say a few words from a student's point of view, I like history the most, from junior high school to high school, and history exams have always been the first, but most of the teachers are really not very good, very boring, every time I go to class, most of the students in the class are sleeping, and few others are listening, even I rarely listen, because the teacher talks about all the textbooks, I read the books before the exam, and I probably remember them all, what do you use the teacher for? I think that as a teacher, the language should be more vivid, and then talk about some things that are not in the books, of course I know that teachers also have their own struggles, the pace of the lectures, and the school's rigid requirements for grades, and what I said earlier is to let you influence the students, so that some of them fall in love with history, and the rest of the people who are not enlightened, you have to be tougher, such as looking up notes, even if they are all copied, but at least when they copy, it will leave some impressions, and ask more questions or something, and I think that will help somewhat, of course, I'm just a student, and I don't know anything about teaching, just talk about my thoughts, and I hope that more and more of your students will fall in love with history, and I think that's it Your success as a teacher.

If you refer to the entrance examination: send some basic materials for them to memorize, the future is their own, and you have done your duty.

If you are referring to the additional test: you might as well persuade him to give up the additional test as soon as possible, learn Chinese and English seriously, and take a good junior college exam.

Teach the lesson well and let the students listen to it, so that you don't have to spend too much time reviewing after class.

Use vivid language to tell history and interact with students in class to enhance students' interest in history. You can joke about certain things with that classmate, so that students can remember the knowledge points while having fun, and you can use pictographic mnemonics, such as remembering 356 BC as Yamamoto 56 (356), the commander of the Japanese Navy during World War II. Handmade!

History is all fake, and there's a to learn it.

Learn about historical figures, such as Adolf, online on your own. Hitler, the Führer's life was inspiring.

As a language memorization, sort out the wrong questions, and watch historical dramas that are more in line with history to increase interest.

If you feel hopeless, just fill in the technical school, there is no need to take the high school entrance examination. All roads lead to Rome.

If you just want to be a history teacher in primary and secondary schools, I advise you not to take the postgraduate examination, there is no point, if you want to be a teacher in a university, graduate students are a must, and good universities already require doctoral students.

Not everything is done if you want to go. Unless you have the confidence to give up the college entrance examination and make a living from your interests.

Anyway, I don't want to study mathematics, chemistry, physics, it's not about interest anymore. This is the basic knowledge that you will have to survive in the future, and you will not be able to pass the college entrance examination without them. So you have to learn, and you have to learn hard, and it's not the college entrance examination who is interested in this year.

Do I have to take the test? If you have a choice or a choice, avoid it. I don't like it to be too hard to learn, and it generally doesn't work well! If you can't avoid it, you have to do your best! Good luck with your exams! China is all exams, and it's good to go to university!

You can choose to focus on your strengths, but you can't lose history.

Don't choose liberal arts, choose science.

I don't read history books, I just look at national treasure archives, tomb documentaries or something, and I got an A in the college entrance examination

Force yourself, think about the good side, slowly cultivate your interests, and don't keep thinking that she is boring

History is meant to be memorized, and you have to learn how to organize your own time and methods.

As an interest, if you don't have a background, it's hard to make a career out of history.

The major of history cultivates historical professionals who have a certain degree of basic Marxist theoretical literacy and systematic professional basic knowledge, and have the potential for further training, as well as application-oriented and interdisciplinary senior professionals who can engage in practical work in state organs, cultural and educational undertakings, press and publication, cultural and museum archives and various intermediary institutions. Students in this major mainly learn the basic theories and basic knowledge of historical science, receive the basic historical facts of the development of Chinese history and world history and the basic training of historical research, and have the basic abilities required for professional work.

History and politics, in fact, can't be rote memorization (although everyone agrees that liberal arts things are rote memorization), but I personally think that history is mainly to be interested, if you think this history is interesting, you will unconsciously remember it, as long as you write it formally during the exam, of course, if you have no interest in history at all, then it's easy to do, you can watch a historical TV series, and then trace the historical origin of this TV series, to see if it is not in line with history, Slowly, you will unconsciously pay attention to all kinds of history. ps: If it doesn't work, there's no way...

As for politics, this is actually a national policy, read more, memorize more, and you will be able to write it out naturally after you are familiar with the exam. As for the fact that you forgot to remember the exam, it is estimated that the first is the result of your rote memorization, and the second is that you are a little afraid of the exam.

I'm like this sometimes, it's a matter of feeling, and I don't do enough questions. As long as you do more often, you will be able to remember it naturally in the exam.

It means that you don't remember it well enough.

Don't memorize the wrong answers, it's easy to get confused when doing the questions, and only remember the correct answers.

Don't be nervous about the exam, be calm and think carefully.

It's not a big problem, after all, the school is manually marked, you can talk to the teacher, and you can write the name of the class.

No, manual marking should not be a big problem, don't worry.

The teacher didn't give the answer sheet during the final exam, and the test paper was zero?

It's okay dear