Does anyone know the answer? Does anyone know the answer?

A1: Specific steps.

With one hand free, grab the snake by the neck so that the snake can't turn back and bite you.

While the tree has not fallen, increase the grip and squeeze tightly, causing the snake to suffocate to death.

Jump off a tree and run ashore with a dragonfly. The crocodile in the water doesn't react that quickly and doesn't have time to bite you.

And he used the serpent in his hand as a whip to stun the lion.

Pick up the axe and escape successfully.

A2: Don't wonder why I said this seemingly unreliable answer, in fact, I am questioning the question itself, why this person would run into a tree and create a desperate situation for himself. If you think about it carefully, if a person is not equipped with special skills, is it possible for him to take this risk and run to a dangerous place where lions, snakes, and crocodiles gather.

Remember, no diamonds, no porcelain work.

Answer 3: Here's the thing: This person is cutting down a tree, and suddenly a lion comes, climbs up the tree, and a snake appears, so he is forced to climb to the treetops, and at this time, the crocodile in the water thinks that there is a big meal to eat, and they are bubbling, so the so-called high IQ problem you see in the scene appears!

Reliable answer: This question is to make the reader think about two questions: 1. Why did this person cut down the tree?

2. What should I do in this scenario? 1. According to the direction in which he cut the tree, it may be to build a bridge; 2. In this kind of time of nine deaths, in fact, the test for us is to keep going (philosophical level), in fact: as long as we move in the direction of the treetops, the tree is likely to fall, the bridge will become, and people have a good chance to successfully escape and reach the other side!

**Warning us that when we encounter difficulties, especially the difficulties of nine deaths, do not give up easily, but continue to insist on going in the original direction... But actually, I personally have a quicker but meaner solution ... Of course, this is in view of the fact that the person who wrote the question itself also.

I can only let it out, 1 move slowly in the direction of the snake, free one hand to kill the snake, 2 use the dead snake as a tool, slowly scare the lion while going down the tree, 3 get the axe, the snake throws at the crocodile, the crocodile is busy eating the snake, can't take care of you, 4, take the axe and fight with the lion! 5The rest depends on the creation of thy people.

Choose 4 of the 6 numbers 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, and 8 to form two two-digit numbers and subtract them to get a difference of 35.

Should it be just these 4 types? Welcome to the face!!

61-26 = 35 (6 reused, estimated not to meet) 62-27 = 35 (2 reused, estimated not to meet) 73-38 = 35 (3 reused, estimated not to meet).

The four numbers chosen are , and the two digits that make up them are , and their difference is 67-32=35.

Choose four numbers that are , and the two digits that make up them are , and their difference is 71-36=35.

The four numbers chosen are , and the two digits that make up are , and their difference is 63-28=35.

Rotational motion with uniform angular acceleration is similar to the formula for uniform acceleration linear motion.

Angular acceleration = torque moment of inertia.

t=(1012×10⁴

The answer is equal to 7 sheep.

Let a donkey be A, a sheep be B, and a chicken C

then there is a-b=2c, c+3b=a

The solution is c=2b, a=5b, so 2b+5b=7b, so it's 7 sheep.

This is an induction question.

The actual situation is: the three people paid a total of 30 yuan, spent 25 yuan, and the waiter hid 2 yuan, so each person spent 9 yuan, plus the 1 yuan shared, it was just 30 yuan.

The point is: this question confuses people mainly because it separates the 2 yuan from the 27 yuan, and the algorithm of the original question mistakenly believes that the 2 yuan left by the waiter is not included in the 27 yuan, so there is an error result of 1 yuan less; In fact, the 2 yuan left without permission was included in the 27 yuan, plus the 3 yuan returned, and the result was exactly 30 yuan.

They spent a total of 27 yuan, which should have subtracted the 2 yuan taken by the waiter, which was exactly equal to the boss's 25 yuan instead of adding the waiter's money, which was an inducement here.

One figure: 36 squares;

2. Figure: 520 For example: 4+2 = divide by 2 to get a 2, 4 multiplied by 2 to get 8, so 4+2 = 28, 10 2=5 10 2=20, so 520

The number of squares is calculated according to the area of the square from small to large: 8 + 2 + 4 4 + 8 + 1 + 1 = 36.

The upstairs buddy has the wrong number of squares, it should be 38, and 10+2 is equal to 520 as he said

Haha, I figured it out! There are at least 15,621 of them, don't believe you!

The first person hides a copy and the remainder: (15621-1) * (4 5) = 12496 The second person hides a copy and the remainder after the second person hides a copy: (12496-1) * (4 5) = 9996 The third person hides a copy and the remainder:

9996-1) * (4 5) = 7996 The fourth person hides one and then the remaining: (7996-1) * (4 5) = 6396 The fifth person hides one and then the remainder: (6396-1) * (4 5) = 5116 The last one is divided into one and each person gets the following

5116-1) * (4 5) = 1023.

I see, maybe (5x5+1) to the power of 5? You can calculate the rest yourself, or you can list the equations, let there be x left at the end, and the equations refer to the previous formula?

It might be much easier to think about this question in a different way.

The end result is nothing more than this: the coconut is divided six times; The five people divided it once, each time they hid a bunch of coconuts (the number of the five people was different), and when it was dawn, everyone divided it again, and this time everyone shared the same number of coconuts (let's say x); The monkey was given 6 coconuts.

First of all, assuming that the monkey doesn't get any of them, then the six divisions are all divided equally, and there is no extra one.

i.e.: 6th divide: x per portion, 5x in total (remember, let's say the monkey didn't get it).

Fifth score: Y per portion, a total of 5y (or assuming the monkey doesn't get it).

Then, 1y of these 5y was secretly hidden, and the remaining 4y was divided into 5 parts at dawn the next day, and each part x

Then there is such a functional relationship: 4y=5x ==>y=5x 4 (the premise of this relationship is still that the monkey does not get it every time).

Here's how to do it, and so on:

The fourth divide: each serving z, a total of 5z, 4z=5y==>z=(5 4) 2*x

The third divide: a per portion, a total of 5a, 4a=5z==>a=(5 4) 3*x

Second division: B per serving, 5B. in total 4b=5a==>b=(5/4)^4*x

The first part: C per portion, a total of 5C, 4C=5B==>C=(5 4) 5*X

The final relation: c=(5 4) 5*x

Since the coconut must be an integer, then c and x must be integers, then the minimum value of x is 4 to the 5th power.

So: x=4 5=1024

y=4^4*5 =1280

z=4^3*5^2=1600

a=4^2*5^3=2000

b=4*5^4=2500

c=5^5=3125

Total: 11535

Don't forget, the 6 monkeys are fixed and unchanging, and are not affected by functional relationships. Now you can add it directly. Get:

11535 + 6 = 11541.

The addition is not right, note that 3*9=27 is the passenger's pay. And the two pieces that the waiter hid were taken from the boss, because the cost of accommodation at this time was 25, so 27-2=25 was used, and the equation was established For this kind of problem of stealing beams and changing pillars, just reason step by step, don't let people lead the way

Without a single dollar, the last question is easy to get around everyone, and it is to use this question to mislead everyone.

Since it is 3 people, 9 yuan per person.

This equation (3 x 9 = 27 yuan + 2 yuan from the waiter = 29 yuan) does not hold.

It should be this equation (3 x 9 = 27 yuan - 2 yuan hidden by the waiter = 25 yuan for accommodation).

Very simple. Because 3 x 9 = 27 yuan + 2 yuan = 29 yuan hidden by the waiter is the wrong algorithm.

The first thing that was determined was that the three people spent a total of 27 yuan, and the 27 yuan included 2 yuan hidden by the waiter. For this formula, it is wrong in terms of thinking. It's easy to confuse people.

27 + 2 = 29 thus deceiving the eye. If you think about it, you'll see it clearly.

It should be calculated like this: 3 people each took out 9 yuan, a total of 3 * 9 = 27 yuan and gave the landlord 25 yuan.

The waiter hid it for 2 yuan.

so：27=25+2

Your algorithm is said to be copied. But it's illogical to look closely!

o( o haha, it's too funny, change the concept ha.

3x9 = 27 yuan, including the 25 yuan received by the boss + 2 yuan hidden by the waiter.

Miss Wang lost: 1. Two pairs of shoes 45 * 2 = 90 yuan;

2. Find 40 yuan for customers;

3. Compensation of 100 yuan to the neighboring shop.

90 + 40 + 100 = 230 yuan.