Why can t the regulatory assistant who has supervised the company for a long time take pictures

The first question: If A stores the goods at B (the stored goods are storable, that is, the goods will not change their original properties due to time problems), if they are stored for a fee, they should comply with the provisions of the custody contract, then B is the custodian and should perform the custody obligation, and the custodian has no right to dispose of the deposited goods. In the case that A does not come back due to an accident for some reason, and B disposes of the custody without A's authorization, if A later recognizes B's disposition, then B's approach is reasonable and lawful.

B would not be liable and could be required to bear A's overdue storage costs when B returned the sales value of the stored goods.

Of course, there are many situations in the first question, which must be explained one by one, because the questions asked are relatively general, so they cannot be generalized.

The second question B, as the legal successor of the original company, has the right to know and know any claims and debts of the original company, so it has the right to dispose of any behavior that harms the interests of the company. Regardless of whether A is in office or resigns, B has the right to claim compensation for the damage caused to the company. Whether or not to win a lawsuit will be determined according to the specific legal provisions.

Because there is a situation where A is in office or A resigns on this issue, the legal basis for Company B's claim may be different, and it should be analyzed according to the specific situation. If these two issues are really involved, it is recommended that the consultant consult a lawyer as soon as possible. As it stands, the second issue may relate to criminal offences.

So don't underestimate.

Personal opinion:

Question 1: B is not responsible, and in this case, unless it can be proved that B deliberately sold at a low price, B's behavior constitutes management without cause and is not responsible for the price difference.

Question 2: "Falsifying the company's money" depends on the specific means and amount, and if it constitutes a criminal issue, it will definitely be okay; "B acquisition" can sue B in the name of the company to demand return, etc.

1. As long as it is not malicious, it should not be held responsible.

2. Sue in the name of a previous company.

Our legal system consists of 8 sectoral laws:

1.Constitution; 2.Constitutional law;

3. Civil and Commercial Law; 4.Administrative law;

5.Economic;

6.social law;

7.Criminal law; 8.Litigation and non-contentious procedural law.

Civil and commercial law is a departmental law in China's legal system, and the scope of adjustment is the legal relationship between equal subjects. Civil law includes many laws such as the General Principles of Civil Law, Marriage Law, Tort Liability Law, and commercial law includes Company Law, Partnership Law, Negotiable Instruments Law, Insurance Law, Enterprise Bankruptcy Law and many other laws.