Some people say that the Sherman tank is as fragile as an eggshell, why did the United States produc

Because although it is very brittle, it can be very useful in some places。If you want the Sherman tank to win against other tanks, you don't have to think about it, but it is really a good hand on some battlefields with high mobility and more infantry. <>

The design of the Sherman tank facilitates production。I have to say that the Sherman tank is indeed very excellent and outstanding in design, its design is very in line with the war era at that time, it is fast and can be mass-produced, and the performance is not bad. And the technology it carries is also very good, for example, it was the fastest turret of all tanks at the time, so it provided a wide range of firepower and high mobility.

One of the most awesome technologies is the artillery vertical stabilizer, which can fire accurately. After all, the tank will be more or less accompanied by shaking during the march, and it is difficult for the gunner to aim, except for those who are very powerful, of course. Once you have this stabilizer, then it is equivalent to having a powerful gunner to help you aim, so the gunner only needs to have a hand.

The Sherman tank played a huge role in World War II. Especially in the Pacific Theater, because the Japan on the opposite side did not have any heavy tanks, the Sherman tank was like a fish in water inside, and the Japanese were like a fish in water. And because of the large-scale production, even if it is against the Tiger tank, even if you are a cow, but I can call people.

As a result, on the battlefield, a large number of Sherman tanks can often be seen gathering together to fight others, effectively limiting the enemy's combat power. <>

Although the Sherman tank performed well, its shortcomings were fatal。Its downside is that it is brittle, especially those American GIs who have driven it, and they will never want to touch it again for the rest of their lives. Because once it hits an enemy tank and gets shot, it's very easy to **and**, which can be regarded as the kind that kills with one hit.

Even so, we can't deny its role.

Because the Sherman tank was in the Asian theater, when it fought against Japan, it directly beat Japan to the point where it was powerless. When it came to the European theater, the Sherman tank turned into a lighter, and it was all there was to it. In the Asian theater, when the United States and Japan fought in the Pacific during World War II, Japan used the Azuki tank, so the Sherman tank directly caught the Adolin tank by surprise, and there was no opponent in the Asian theater.

At that time, in order to eliminate the Japanese infantry, the U.S. military even directly converted the Sherman tank into a fire-breathing tank, and this tank was very suitable for combat in the tropical jungle. At the same time, in the Battle of Iwo Jima, the Spitfire played a decisive role in the battle, and also played a role in the destruction of Japanese fortifications.

Although the Sherman tank is unremarkable, it is very useful on the Asian battlefield, but in the European theater, because of the terrain and the relatively advanced tank equipment used by the German army at that time, the US army did not use the Sherman tank on the European battlefield.

The Sherman tank is a medium tank with basically adequate armor and moderate firepower. However, the main opponents during World War II were Germany and Japan. Japan's military strength during World War II was relatively weak, and because of Japan's weak heavy industry base, Japan mainly used some manufacturing equipment during World War II.

At the same time, Japan focused on the development of the navy and air force at that time, and had relatively little equipment for the army, so the equipment of the Japanese army at that time could not defeat the Sherman tanks of the US army.

Before Germany launched World War II, it focused on the development of heavy industry, although its strength at that time was not as good as that of the United States, but Germany's heavy industry was also relatively developed, and Germany at that time pursued a blitzkrieg strategy. Therefore, in terms of advanced equipment, it is natural to have strong strength in order to confront other countries in Europe.

Although the Sherman tank is only used in the Asian battlefield, the performance of the Sherman tank is still good, it is not bad, and it is still very strong.

Because the Sherman tank is highly mobile, and it is easy to produce, and the cost is low.

Because 1, Sherman is cheap and easy to make, its manufacturing method is simple, and it can be used on a large scale 2. The manufacturing technology of Chongtan in the United States at that time was not enough, and it was impossible to make a "Pershing", so it could only be made with Sherman. 3. The United States has strong industrial manufacturing capacity and a lot of people, so it is a big deal to be rebuilt and relied on quantity.

Because the practicability of this tank is very strong, the cost is relatively low, and it can be easily produced in large quantities.

At least about 4,000 vehicles were lost, because the United States was relatively short of tank crews at that time, and many vehicles only had 3 tank crews; At the same time, the United States lost about 3,500 vehicles on the worst Western Front.

During World War II, the production of Sherman tanks ranked first in the world, surpassing the Soviet T34, with a total of 49,234 units produced. Of these, 22,030 Shermans went to the allies. The Soviet Union, as the main battlefield against Germany, received only 4,102 Sherman tanks.

From June 1944 to January 1945, the United States and Britain lost a total of 6,301 tanks.

During World War II, the United States lost a total of Sherman tanks because they did not make a real number of calculations, but only covered them, so there is no conclusive basis.

In the European theater, the Germans had a variety of anti-tank guns and individual anti-tank **. Therefore, the losses are larger!

Because although the Sherman tank is not very lethal, it is cheap to build, easy to produce, and can be mass-produced, so it is produced in large quantities.

The Sherman lateral opponent was the Type 97 tank, the third and fourth tanks. By the time the Tiger Panthers came out, there were enough Shermans to continue to fight. Add air superiority and Pershing on the way to the fray, and Sherman should be on the move.

That's because anything that is bad has its other side to shine, and although Sherman Tucker is fragile defensively, he has an advantage in mobility and combat ability.

That's because the Sherman tank's power system is very strong and durable, and it will not be distressed to lose a lot of money on the battlefield, because it is very cheap to build and can be produced quickly.

World War II was a war in which quantity prevailed over quality, and although the German Tiger and Leopard tanks could also defeat the Soviet T34 tank and the American Sherman tank in a 1:10 exchange ratio, even if a Tiger tank could destroy ten Allied tanks before it was destroyed, the total production of 7,300 Tiger and Leopard tanks would not be enough to change the fact that the United States and the Soviet Union could produce 70,000 tanks per year.

The United States really had no experience in producing advanced main battle tanks at that time, and the United States' strong production capacity and logistics capabilities of gasoline these resources allowed the Americans to call in a large number of Sherman tanks to besiege the main battlefield of Germany, because they had enough gasoline!

At the beginning of Operation Barbarossa, the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1940, the German army was the first to encounter the powerful impact of the Soviet T34 tank and KV tank. Admiral Guderian, the father of the actual blitzkrieg, personally inspected the captured KV1 and T34 tanks, and found that the performance was very good, surpassing the German No. 4 car.

Although Stalin inherited the backwardness of Tsarist Russia, the Soviet army made great efforts in the design and production of tanks. Before that, the T34 was a real tank power. The theory of inclined armor of the T34, the diesel engine in large reserves, and the American-patented Christie suspension device were not something that Germany could catch up with in a short time.

Of course, the German tank guns were good, and the radio communications were complete.

In the face of the tank sea tactics of the United States and the Soviet Union, Germany was almost helpless. During World War II, Germany's tank production was less than 70,000, but the United States and the Soviet Union both exceeded 100,000. At the same time, German tanks were notoriously difficult to build, and after the war the Soviets believed that the production of the Panthers required man-hours similar to that of tonnage, but the more combat-ready Stalin 2 was more than twice as large.

Germany's industrial scale is much smaller than that of the United States and the Soviet Union, and German factories can only be regarded as "high-level handicraft workshops", although the manufacturing process is better than that of the United States and the Soviet Union, but large-scale assembly lines are not Germany's strong point. At the same time, other basic industries are not on a sufficient scale. Germany produced only 40 million tonnes of steel (four-year total), the United States 80 million and the Soviet Union 60 million.

Oil production was also only 1 3 of that of the United States and the Soviet Union. Rubber is even more scarce, and it is at the same level as China.

Because Germany's resources are relatively insufficient, it is impossible for it to adopt the mass production tactics of the United States, and can only build high-precision and sophisticated products like the Tiger type, and use the quality advantage to smooth out the disadvantage of quantity! As for the Soviet T34 tank, this is probably the reason, after all, Germany does not have the same amount of supplies as the Soviet Union!

The application of tanks in actual combat is not particularly extensive, and the cost of manpower and material resources is also very huge, and the United States is unwilling to do useless work.

At that time, the United States had to go to the European theater to fight, and it needed to take a ship, and the tanks were heavy and expensive to transport military funds, so they did not build them.

Heavy tanks require a lot of accessories to complete the transatlantic mission, which is quite expensive for war, and it is also too labor-intensive, which is not convenient and cost-effective.

Because the manufacture of tanks at that time was very expensive, and many parts and components were difficult to ship, it was very troublesome.

The United States believed that the tank was too heavy and not good, inconvenient for attacking and inconvenient for cross-country, and was not suitable for the battle that had to be crossed to Europe at that time.

The proportion of financial resources and manpower consumption has many inconveniences in war, and what the US military needs more is offensive, off-road performance, mileage and simplified logistics.

Because at that time, even if the tank was built, transportation was a big problem, and it was not cost-effective at that time.

The Sherman tank still had a very prominent drawback: it did not have enough firepower to fight the new German tanks. Gasoline-powered engines are highly susceptible to burning after being hit. The hull is tall, which increases the area of the hit shot.

In the spring of 1942, the Sherman tank appeared for the first time in the North African theater. At that time, Rommel's African Corps was equipped with mainly PZ-F tanks and a small number of No. 4 long-body tubes, so the Sherman tank had unquestionable battlefield dominance, and the British army used it heavily in the Battle of El Alamein. After the battle, Rommel wrote:

The enemy's new Sherman tank, more advanced than all our models. ”

With the change of time, the opponent of M4 is no longer the "three-style" and "four-style" of the past, and the appearance of "tiger" and "leopard" makes M4 vulnerable.

The armor was relatively thin, the firepower was insufficient to deal with the tiger and leopard, the gasoline was flammable, and the hull was too high.

First of all, when driving or forcibly crossing rivers in water networks, rice fields, swamps, tanks often silt up due to poor ground attachment conditions. After the tank is silted, if the tank itself is in good technical condition and the engine traction force is greater than the movement resistance after the silting, the tank can be driven away from the silt site. The method of using the tank's own power to get out of the silt is called self-rescue.

When self-helping, it is necessary to try to improve the adhesion as much as possible, and at the same time it is necessary to minimize the resistance to movement.

This is followed by defense against infantry anti-tank **, iron fist, anti-tank grenades, etc., but it has almost no effect on defending kinetic energy projectiles. Sherman's flanks are already weak and almost vertical, making them vulnerable to heat bombs. After adding logs, it can detonate heat in advance, so that its high-temperature and high-pressure metal jet will be consumed in advance, then its effect on the armor will be greatly reduced, and if the angle is large, it can be effectively defended.

The U.S. military on the Western Front is a large contributor to illegal modifications, and not only logs on the side, but also sandbags are common. Basically, everything that can be hung is basically hung. The purpose is to deal with the depth of penetration of the enemy infantry and the distance from the ** point to the armor plate, as long as it can detonate the heat in advance, it can weaken its power.

Not only the American army, but also the Soviet army, but also our army had similar habits.

This tank is a medium combat tank produced in the United States during World War II.

There are a total of four models of this tank: A1, A2, A3, A4 The caliber of each model is divided into: 75mm, 76mm, 90mm, 105mm According to the shortcomings of the M3 "Grant", the military required the 75mm gun to be mounted on the rotating turret, and the development code was T6 medium tank, in September 1941, the T6 tank was finalized and named the M4 "Sherman" medium tank.

The wood you are talking about is the modified M4 "Sherman" medium tank.

When the artillery is fired, the firepower is insufficient, and the wood next to it will be automatically replenished to enhance the firepower and increase the rate of fire, so as to achieve a stronger ** force.

When the tank gets stuck in mud or a pit, use these logs to get the tank out.

To protect small Japan from anti-tank mines with magnets.

The Sherman tank, also known as the Sherman tank. Made in the United States, equipped with the U.S. Army during World War II, 5 members, full combat weight, depot, width, height, maximum range of 161 km, armor thickness 15 75mm, a 75mm short-barreled gun, a machine gun and anti-aircraft machine gun.

The Sherman tank is the main tank of the Allied forces in World War II, with a simple structure, low cost, and easy mass production, and on the battlefield, the 75mm short-barreled gun can effectively hit the infantry. But there are great shortcomings on the battlefield, first of all, the short-barreled gun has low armor-piercing power compared to the long-barreled gun, and the Sherman hull is too high, easy to expose to a large bomb area, and the frontal body armor is only 57mm, which is easy to be scrapped by German tanks. The Sherman tank runs on gasoline and is not insured, so it can be said that it can be used as a dozen, so it has the title of "lighter".